ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Re: OT: Remember that Adam Carriker doofus we could of had for a 5th?
BTW, Since Haslett was the line coach for Carriker in St. Louis, it's more likely that the Skins contacted the Rams about him.. But, you keep on saying that the Pats could have traded for him without any proof to support that idea..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: OT: Remember that Adam Carriker doofus we could of had for a 5th?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJB87
Well, if they ended up trading him to the Redkins that means he was available for trade. By that known fact (which is known because he was traded) he was available for us to acquire.
edit: Bottom line, I'm smarter than you. Deal with it.
wait! Who is he?
__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH
Re: OT: Remember that Adam Carriker doofus we could of had for a 5th?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz
BTW, Since Haslett was the line coach for Carriker in St. Louis, it's more likely that the Skins contacted the Rams about him.. But, you keep on saying that the Pats could have traded for him without any proof to support that idea..
I'm not even going to go into explaining the obvious fact that he was available to trade for again.
Re: OT: Remember that Adam Carriker doofus we could of had for a 5th?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJB87
No but I'm interested in meeting him. He seems smart. Or did did the 99% scum of this forum chase away yet another brilliant Football mind?
I wouldn't resort to calling anyone 'scum' in here ..there are better terms to use to voice your displeasure of thier disagreements,please use respect if you can.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: OT: Remember that Adam Carriker doofus we could of had for a 5th?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PATRIOTSFANINPA
I wouldn't resort to calling anyone 'scum' in here ..there are better terms to use to voice your displeasure of thier disagreements,please use respect if you can.
That was the best compliment I could come up with at the time.
Re: OT: Remember that Adam Carriker doofus we could of had for a 5th?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJB87
Well, if they ended up trading him to the Redkins that means he was available for trade. By that known fact (which is known because he was traded) he was available for us to acquire.
edit: Bottom line, I'm smarter than you. Deal with it.
You clearly don't understand how trading works. Many times people don't know if a player is available until they INQUIRE about him. Being that Haslett was Carriker's line coach in St. Louis and had just come from St. Louis himself, it's much more likely that he went to Shanahan to inquire about Carriker.
What you fail to understand is that there is a difference between actively shopping a player and someone calling you to inquire about a player.
So, to make the statement that he was available for the Pats to acquire without knowing whether or not the Rams were actively shopping Carriekr around is just BS on your part.
Bottom line is that you aren't smarter than me and you've failed every chance you have taken to prove it.
Re: OT: Remember that Adam Carriker doofus we could of had for a 5th?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJB87
Just some schlub playing 3-4 DE that has more sacks than anyone on our team.
Who happens to also play in a different system entirely than the ones the Pats run... facts like that kill your argument. Especially when you blatantly ignore them.