ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Perception, it ain't what it seems, some interesting NFL Fact (to me at least)
331
331
336
344
344
These are the final points against for 5 teams, some are perceived to be great defenses, some are perceived to be poor defenses, believe it or not, The GREAT Houston Defense, gave up 331 points this year, so did the Horrendous Pat's D (being sarcastic). The Great Baltimore D gave up 344, so did the Great NY Giants D. The Horrendous Green Bay Packers D gave up 336, which was less than Baltimore and the Giants, and ONLY 5 points more than the GREAT Texans D.
It's funny how some things are perceived in the NFL. Perception: The Pats and Packers can score a ton of points, but their defenses are so horrible they can't stop anyone. Yet the Texans and Ravens are the next Steel Curtains.
I just find it very interesting.
Perception: The Pat's Defense was WAY better in the 2nd half of the season. Truth, The Pats only gave up 9 more points in the first half of the season (170 points) as opposed to the second half (161 points). I will say this though, the first half of the season, the Pats only held opponents under 20 points 2 times, while in the second half of the season, they did it 5 times, including 5 out of the last 6 games, so I will agree with the perception that the Pat's D was better in the second half of the season.
Offensively, the Pats averaged 4 points more per game in the second half of the season (36.9 to 32.8). That's a neat fact. Step it up offensively, shut it down defensively, gives me a lot of hope.
Final note, a painful one, the Pats lost 4 games by a combined 11 points (2.75 per loss). Wow, a couple of field goals or TD's here and there away from 13-3, 14-2, 15-1 or 16-0.
Last edited by scott99; 12-31-2012 at 11:56 AM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Points against is a terrible stat because it doesn't take into account the fact most teams go into desperation mode once our offense gets going.
It's a coping stat patsfans use. At the end of the day, on a final drive, I'll take Houston's D over ours.
It comes down to what your eyes tell you.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The Patriots have been overachievers the past two years. It doesn't have the talent to compensate for injuries, and it wins so much because it puts in 99% effort in the regular season and plays with terrific schemes to mask its deficiencies.
But in the playoffs a good team at 99% will not beat emotional, talented teams that play at 100%. It's what happened against the Giants in 2011 and the Ravens in 2012.
Re: Perception, it ain't what it seems, some interesting NFL Fact (to me at least)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DocHoliday
Points against is a terrible stat because it doesn't take into account the fact most teams go into desperation mode once our offense gets going.
It's a coping stat patsfans use. At the end of the day, on a final drive, I'll take Houston's D over ours.
It comes down to what your eyes tell you.
To my 'coping stat' eyes, I would rather use points than yards as I assume your 'eyes' do.
And by the way, isnt desperation mode the way every team play us? I am not sure how this applies to a lower point total, but I am sure it makes sense to you.
Re: Perception, it ain't what it seems, some interesting NFL Fact (to me at least)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DocHoliday
Points against is a terrible stat because it doesn't take into account the fact most teams go into desperation mode once our offense gets going.
It's a coping stat patsfans use. At the end of the day, on a final drive, I'll take Houston's D over ours.
It comes down to what your eyes tell you.
So Doc,
are you saying if Teams didn't go into "desperation mode" they
would have scored more points?
But isn't that the case with all teams not just the PATs?
Re: Perception, it ain't what it seems, some interesting NFL Fact (to me at least)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DocHoliday
Points against is a terrible stat because it doesn't take into account the fact most teams go into desperation mode once our offense gets going.
It's a coping stat patsfans use. At the end of the day, on a final drive, I'll take Houston's D over ours.
It comes down to what your eyes tell you.
Yesterday, on the final drive, with the game on the line, Green Bay couldn't stop Minnesota from running it down their throats and driving to a chip shot field goal as time expired, costing them home field advantage. Yesterday, on the final drive, with home field for the playoffs on the line, Houston couldn't stop Indy from going on a 16 play drive chewing up the last 9:46 on the clock and preventing the Texans from getting a chance to come back, a drive on which Indy could easily have put points on the board if they hadn't just run out the clock.
If those teams are going to have to depend on their defenses making a stand at the end of the game, they're in trouble. IDK about the Pats, but I like our defenses' chances of making better than the two defenses from those teams that I saw yesterday. Just what my eyes tell me.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid
"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi
Re: Perception, it ain't what it seems, some interesting NFL Fact (to me at least)
Quote:
Originally Posted by patsfaninpa
Not only were we tied for 9th in points allowed. We were 2nd in forcing turnovers. Way more important than yardage.
Please don't succumb to that line of thinking. Both turnovers and yardage are important. When you can't get turnovers (something that happens in the postseason), you have to focus on limiting yardage in order to get the ball back in your high powered offense's hands. The inability to consistently execute one of those two facets on defense is one of the primary things that cost us the Super Bowl last year.
Re: Perception, it ain't what it seems, some interesting NFL Fact (to me at least)
Quote:
Originally Posted by KontradictioN
Please don't succumb to that line of thinking. Both turnovers and yardage are important. When you can't get turnovers (something that happens in the postseason), you have to focus on limiting yardage in order to get the ball back in your high powered offense's hands. The inability to consistently execute one of those two facets on defense is one of the primary things that cost us the Super Bowl last year.
The fact that they are in top 10 in points allowed is certainly encouraging.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To my 'coping stat' eyes, I would rather use points than yards as I assume your 'eyes' do.
And by the way, isnt desperation mode the way every team play us? I am not sure how this applies to a lower point total, but I am sure it makes sense to you.
We are high scoring, therefore teams go into downfield passes play after play to catch up, allowing us turnovers. Teams routinely pass on fourth down on us and go for the TD instead of field goals to get back in the game. If our O wasn't good this wouldn't happen.
When teams are in control of our offense, they can run through our D like the 49ers did and score.
Frankly, we have an 06 colts like defense that lives and breathes on the O scoring points and forcing mistakes.
I don't think we have a good defense, merely an adequate one that complements the O.
Yardage is just as, if not more important in the playoffs. If you give up a lot of yards but little points in the regular season it usually means the other offense couldn't execute against our D. Except in the playoffs everyone is good and everyone can execute so relying on mistakes while giving up big yards isn't practical.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The Patriots have been overachievers the past two years. It doesn't have the talent to compensate for injuries, and it wins so much because it puts in 99% effort in the regular season and plays with terrific schemes to mask its deficiencies.
But in the playoffs a good team at 99% will not beat emotional, talented teams that play at 100%. It's what happened against the Giants in 2011 and the Ravens in 2012.
Last edited by DocHoliday; 12-31-2012 at 01:24 PM..