04-23-2012, 04:45 PM
|
#32
|
|
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Shore. No; north of there.
Posts: 7,003
My Mood:
|
Re: Sources: Saints' GM could eavesdrop on opposing coaches during home games
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Sellers
Okay, so let me get this straight.
Sclereth is saying that physically listening in to a play call with about 40 seconds to go before the snap is of no advantage, because it is of no use - but watching three different people relay hand signals in several seconds later is a huge advantage because you may have cracked the code and the opponent over the course of several weeks (or several years) wouldn't possibly change those signals.
Yeah, that makes a whole lot of sense.
If I recall correctly hasn't Schlereth been one of those guys that keeps saying 'if it didn't help, then why did they do it' in regards to the Pats over the last five years?
So why is he not applying the same logic to the Saints?
F#*%ing hypocrite, that's why.
|
Tom Curran has been doing a good job of challenging Schlereth on Twitter:
Quote:
Mark Schelereth on ESPN saying he can't see how Loomis bugging of coaches booths would help during game. ...
This is the same guy who, 4 yrs ago, thought Patriots could videotape defensive signals, crack code and adjust to audibles at halftime ...
ESPN talk revolving on Loomis merely being able to divine play calls. Get alot more than that from box - injuries, what's being set up, etc
|
__________________
"If they sought to intimidate us, to terrorize us, to shake us from ... the values that make us who we are, as Americans -- well, it should be pretty clear by now that they picked the wrong city to do it. Not here in Boston. Not here in Boston."
—President Barack Obama, April 18, 2013
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
|
|