They are underachievers (Hilarious article on the Colts loss) - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > NFL Football Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-04-2009, 04:31 PM   #1
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 313
Default They are underachievers (Hilarious article on the Colts loss)

I don't know if this has been posted yet, but this article is great:


Quote:
Let's just say it -- again: They are underachievers

SAN DIEGO -- Another 12-victory season . . . and nothing.

Another Peyton Manning MVP season . . . and nothing.

Another Tony Dungy playoff appearance, his record 10th straight . . . and nothing.

Another glorious chance to advance to a Super Bowl, their second in three years, with the New England Patriots out of the way and the AFC unfettered by the existence of a dominant team . . . and nothing.

Let's just say it how it is: The Colts are the ultimate paper tigers. And if you don't like the Atlanta Braves comparison -- multiple postseason appearances, one championship -- feel free to come up with your own. But how can a franchise be so routinely dominant year after year, and yet be found so routinely lacking when the brightest lights are shining?

Saturday night's 23-17 overtime loss to the short-handed San Diego Chargers was all too typical of the Colts' recent postseason history.

It happens year after year after frustrating and infuriating year. And it's always something. The weather in New England. The officiating in New England. The long layoff before Pittsburgh. The Dwight Freeney injury against San Diego.

It's always something.

And yet teams like last year's Giants march on despite losing Jeremy Shockey, or the Chargers win this game without their top running back.

If it happens once, it's an anomaly. But this happens time and time again. It's a trend, and it's something Jim Irsay and Bill Polian have got to address. The nagging problem this year was that running game, the one Polian kept insisting was just fine, despite ample statistical evidence to the contrary.

It wasn't fine.

It was never fine.

And now the Colts are going on vacation way before a team with this talent, this pedigree, ought to be hitting the links.

These were not just the 8-8 San Diego Chargers. These were the 8-8 Chargers without a reasonable facsimile of LaDainian Tomlinson, who didn't even play in the second half because of a serious groin injury. These were the 8-8 Chargers with Antonio Gates struggling with a high ankle sprain. And yet, there was Gates, maybe the toughest guy on the field, riding Antoine Bethea downfield for a monster first down on San Diego's game-winning drive in overtime.

Last year, the Chargers beat the Colts with backup quarterback Billy Volek, or as we came to call him, Billy Freaking Volek. This year, the Chargers beat the Colts with Mike Scifres, a punter, and a magical elf named Darren Sproles, who merely filled in for Tomlinson and produced 328 all-purpose yards.

And, oh yes, there was the San Diego defense, which held the Colts' underperforming offense in check, as is often the case in the playoffs. For all of Manning's greatness, for all the weapons the Colts have on that side of the football, the fact is, Manning is sub-.500 in the playoffs, along with his head coach. The running game was a cipher. Marvin Harrison was invisible, as he usually is during the playoffs. Still think Harrison is coming back next season?

Predictably, the Colts defense will get pounded this morning and for the rest of the week, and those three defensive penalties on the game-winning drive don't speak well of their discipline down the stretch, but they did force two San Diego turnovers in the end zone on potential game-tying or go-ahead drives.

They played well enough to win.

Bottom line is, when the Colts needed a third-and-short conversion, they couldn't get it. You can't win in the playoffs if you can't run the football.

It's pretty elemental stuff. The Colts couldn't run it. Couldn't run it all season, couldn't run it all night, couldn't run it when one conversion on third-and-2 with 2:30 left in regulation and San Diego out of timeouts could have put this game away.

One and done.

Or, should we say, one and Dungy.

If (when) Tony Dungy decides to retire sometime next week, will there be a great hue and cry for him to come back and give it another shot? As much as this town loves and reveres him and appreciates him for everything he's done on and off the field, isn't it time for a new face, a new voice, something different?

At this point, it's going to be tough selling fans on Jim Caldwell who, at least from a distance, promises to bring more of the same.

Overtime?

Of course it went overtime.

Because they're the Colts and the Chargers. Because they don't know how to play football games that don't end on the final drive, the final play, the final gasp. Because they've developed as good of a rivalry as you will ever see between two teams who aren't in the same division.

It took more than 60 minutes to decide, but the deserving team won.

There's no nice way of saying what has to be said:

Paper tigers.

Folding again.


Bob Kravitz: Let's just say it -- again: They are underachievers | IndyStar.com | The Indianapolis Star
lightningbolt is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-04-2009, 07:18 PM   #2
All Pro Poster
 
PATSYLICIOUS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,225
Default Re: They are underachievers (Hilarious article on the Colts loss)

Comparing them to the Atlanta Braves is an insult to the Braves LOL At least Atlanta made the World series on multiple occasions if I remember correctly.
PATSYLICIOUS is offline  
Old 01-04-2009, 08:41 PM   #3
Blagger
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default Re: They are underachievers (Hilarious article on the Colts loss)

If the recent SB champion Colts are underachievers...what does that make the Chargers?
 
Old 01-04-2009, 09:29 PM   #4
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 313
Default Re: They are underachievers (Hilarious article on the Colts loss)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blagger View Post
If the recent SB champion Colts are underachievers...what does that make the Chargers?


The Chagers didn't make the playoffs 10 years in a row. We also don't have the supposed best quarterback in the league, so naturally expectations are lower for us. The Chargers underachieved in 2006 because they had a 14-2 record but since then they have been playing above their record in the playoffs. The Colts on the other hand just went one and done to an 8-8 team even though they had a 12-4 record.
lightningbolt is offline  
Old 01-04-2009, 10:03 PM   #5
All Pro Poster
 
PATSYLICIOUS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,225
Default Re: They are underachievers (Hilarious article on the Colts loss)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blagger View Post
If the recent SB champion Colts are underachievers...what does that make the Chargers?
When were the Chargers ever hyped up for anything? Every year all we here is how great the Colts are. Remember in 2004 divisional round they were FAVORED coming into Gillette against our 14-2 defending SB champs.
PATSYLICIOUS is offline  
Old 01-04-2009, 10:07 PM   #6
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsFanJess's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,227
My Mood: Happy
Default Re: They are underachievers (Hilarious article on the Colts loss)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blagger View Post
If the recent SB champion Colts are underachievers...what does that make the Chargers?
The team that has ended the Colts season for the last two years.
PatsFanJess is offline  
Old 01-04-2009, 10:18 PM   #7
ALP
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ALP's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,153
Default Re: They are underachievers (Hilarious article on the Colts loss)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blagger View Post
If the recent SB champion Colts are underachievers...what does that make the Chargers?
a team which helps Indy out when it comes to underachieving time...
__________________
Last time I lived in New England the Pats became a Dynasty

Then I moved away and they haven't won since

...now I'm moving back, and a Lombardi I predict
ALP is offline  
Old 01-05-2009, 06:11 AM   #8
In the Starting Line-up
 
Pat the Pats Fan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Baldwin, MD
Posts: 2,773
My Mood: Busy
Default Re: They are underachievers (Hilarious article on the Colts loss)

The Colts become the Geldings during the playoffs....
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


A sarcastic Bill Belichick on Tom Brady's finger injury, "It's not life threatening."
Pat the Pats Fan is offline  
Old 01-05-2009, 08:48 AM   #9
JSn
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
JSn's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,449
Default Re: They are underachievers (Hilarious article on the Colts loss)

Kind of makes you thankful that we went 11-5, tied for first in our division and never had to prove anything in the playoff's. We just lost the wrong games. The Fish pretty much proved by their performance they weren't the best 11-5 team in the AFCE. And so we avoid a lot of ripping from the media and the "what could have been" allure keeps us a junked out for Patriots football as ever. Meanwhile we get to sit back and watch all the "good teams" blow it.

These articles are hilarious because if the defense had gotten the ball back and the Colts drove the field for a simple FG from the former best kicker in the league (that'd be Ghost now, ) they be touted as world-beaters.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JSn is offline  
Old 01-05-2009, 01:40 PM   #10
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Rob0729's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 25,374
Default Re: They are underachievers (Hilarious article on the Colts loss)

Personally, I thought the Colts overachieved in the regular season and played to form in the playoffs. Watching them play other than maybe 3-4 games this season, I never felt they were clearly the better team on the field. In fact, many of the games they won, they got outplayed and the other team let them hang around long enough to make a handful of plays to give them the win. I think if the Colts lost the games they probably had no right winning, but did anyway; their record would have been something like 9-7 or 8-8. They should have lost to at least to Minnesota, Houston in the first game, Cleveland, and the Patriots. In two of those games (Cleveland and Houston), the difference between winning and losing were a fumble recovery returned for a TD in each of those games. Fumble recoveries for TDs are at least partially luck that the ball bounces in a place where the defenser can scoop it up and run it back.

I didn't think much of the Colts this entire season even with a 12-4 record. I gave them their due for winning games even ones they didn't have any business winning, but I expected them to lose either this weekend or next weekend. With their history vs. the Chargers, I had a good feeling they would lose this weekend.
Rob0729 is online now  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Texans beating Colts pats1 NFL Football Forum 101 10-06-2008 03:38 PM
OT: Wanna read an article about how bad the Colts are? Pat_Nasty PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 27 10-22-2006 06:36 PM
Colts release starting LG Lilja (?) pats1 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 9 06-09-2006 08:45 AM
Colts play the waiting game Box_O_Rocks PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 3 01-06-2006 10:34 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC