3-4 DE Michael Brockers - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree16Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-24-2012, 02:42 PM   #11
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,196
Default re: 3-4 DE Michael Brockers

I'm not sure Belichick values the 5 technique as must as he did a decade ago. The game was different back when he was drafting guys like Warren high in the 1st round, when stout run defenses were championship defenses. Now, it's all about stopping the pass. A 5 technique is only a part time player in today's Belichick defense.

Now, If Belichick views Brockers as a Seymour-esque interior rush monster, my opinion changes, but most scouting reports see him as more of a 5 tech.
Criptonite likes this.
stinkypete is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 03-24-2012, 02:47 PM   #12
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,446
My Mood: Mellow
Default re: 3-4 DE Michael Brockers

Quote:
Originally Posted by captain stone View Post
I hope not. He's not worth a top-10 pick. Fletcher Cox, OTOH...
.... isn't worth a top 10 pick, either
__________________
"We want to build a big, strong, tough, smart, fast, disciplined football team that will consistently compete for a championship."
-- Scott Pioli, from the Patriots scouting manual
rookBoston is offline  
Old 03-24-2012, 02:51 PM   #13
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,446
My Mood: Mellow
Default re: 3-4 DE Michael Brockers

Quote:
Originally Posted by stinkypete View Post
Now, If Belichick views Brockers as a Seymour-esque interior rush monster, my opinion changes, but most scouting reports see him as more of a 5 tech.
Confused what you mean. Seymour played 5-technique for us, too.
__________________
"We want to build a big, strong, tough, smart, fast, disciplined football team that will consistently compete for a championship."
-- Scott Pioli, from the Patriots scouting manual
rookBoston is offline  
Old 03-24-2012, 02:53 PM   #14
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,671
Default re: 3-4 DE Michael Brockers

Would much rather have Devon Still - at least there's some production there.
manxman2601 is offline  
Old 03-24-2012, 03:46 PM   #15
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 661
Default re: 3-4 DE Michael Brockers

I personally don't believe all four of Cox, Poe, Still and Brockers will make it to pick 27. If the last of these makes it to the 22-24 range I would make a minor trade-up to snag whoever is the last of four ... unless you like Reyes better in the early second that is!
__________________
‘Dang! Um, Mr. Brady, can we line up?’
mrscruff is online now  
Old 03-24-2012, 03:56 PM   #16
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,671
Default re: 3-4 DE Michael Brockers

The one question though is how does BB feel about these 5-techs now? Last year we passed on three supposed ideal ones in Cam Jordan, Heyward and Muhammed Wilkerson. Was that simply the lockout dictating that or has BB's priorities changed? The "need" has been there the last two years and BB hasn't addressed it. Is this year likely to be any different?
Criptonite likes this.
manxman2601 is offline  
Old 03-24-2012, 05:29 PM   #17
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 326
Default re: 3-4 DE Michael Brockers

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrscruff View Post
I personally don't believe all four of Cox, Poe, Still and Brockers will make it to pick 27. If the last of these makes it to the 22-24 range I would make a minor trade-up to snag whoever is the last of four ... unless you like Reyes better in the early second that is!
Still and his 50% motor? No thanks. He was absolutely owned by the Wisconsin OLiners, pushed back and taken out of play 1on1 numerous times vs average college OLs from Illinois.

Poe? Watch him get blocked 1on1 by a RB around 1:27 in this video Dontari Poe - YouTube A competent DT would've run all over that RB. Another guy with a very questionable motor.
Opposing line coach on Dontari Poe: “He took plays off” | ProFootballTalk
Poe can run fast at 350, under 5sec 40 but then again, so did this 350 guy. Brandon Keith - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia He is now a FA and Arizona are not rushing to get him back.
patsderoer is offline  
Old 03-25-2012, 10:58 AM   #18
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,615
Default re: 3-4 DE Michael Brockers

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrscruff View Post
I personally don't believe all four of Cox, Poe, Still and Brockers will make it to pick 27. If the last of these makes it to the 22-24 range I would make a minor trade-up to snag whoever is the last of four ... unless you like Reyes better in the early second that is!
I have to agree with you on thinking the 4 DT's will be off the board by #27. A lot of draftniks have Reyes climbing into the bottom of the first round.

However I put Reyes in the same category as Barron. Second round grade, that could move up based on need.

If Carolina takes Cox at #9 it could start a mini run on the DT position.

Ideally Brockers would be available at #15 and I think Philly would jump at the chance for #31 and #48 for #15.

Seems like we've had Andy Reid programmed in #1 on the war room phone speed dial for the past decade. (Ha! Ha!)
Warren94 likes this.
Ochmed Jones is offline  
Old 03-25-2012, 11:15 AM   #19
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hershey, PA
Posts: 7,154
My Mood: Angry
Default re: 3-4 DE Michael Brockers

Quote:
Originally Posted by rookBoston View Post
.... isn't worth a top 10 pick, either
Prob. true, but he is still more worthy of a trade-up (late teens/early 20s?) than Brockers is.
__________________
Question Authority.
captain stone is offline  
Old 03-25-2012, 11:18 AM   #20
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hershey, PA
Posts: 7,154
My Mood: Angry
Default re: 3-4 DE Michael Brockers

Quote:
Originally Posted by manxman2601 View Post
The one question though is how does BB feel about these 5-techs now? Last year we passed on three supposed ideal ones in Cam Jordan, Heyward and Muhammed Wilkerson. Was that simply the lockout dictating that or has BB's priorities changed? The "need" has been there the last two years and BB hasn't addressed it. Is this year likely to be any different?
Excellent question.
__________________
Question Authority.
captain stone is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
my first round mock 2.0 - Pats trade down at #27; Michael Brockers at #31 patsfan-1982 Patriots Draft Talk 9 03-20-2012 03:16 PM
Realistic or not? Reuter mock on NFL.com: DT Michael Brockers, DE Nick Perry ctpatsfan77 Patriots Draft Talk 15 02-11-2012 04:12 PM
Banks latest mock: LSU DT Michael Brockers, Alabama LB Dont'a Hightower everlong Patriots Draft Talk 12 02-04-2012 09:14 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC