04-09-2008, 01:39 PM
|
#11
|
|
In the Starting Line-up
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,448
|
Re: The all-in 1st round scenario
Quote:
Originally Posted by patchick
I've been part of the "no CB at #7!" chorus, and I'm not wavering. BUT...a CB after a trade down is a different matter, especially if you can still wrangle yourself a pass rusher. So suppose your goal is to reconstruct the 2 #1s and come away with 2 impact players, and to heck with everything else?
TRADE, swap 1st & 2nd-round picks with Cinci, Bengals take Ellis at #7.
#9: Leodis McKelvin
TRADE: Patriots send #46, #69 and a 2009 3rd to Seattle for #25
#25: Quentin Groves
You then sit for the next 70 picks, but you've added two explosive young talents to lay a new foundation of youth and speed on defense.
Thoughts?
|
I like your idea. Quality not quantity. New Orleans might be a
better trade partner because they have more salary cap room.
If the Pats are not able to swing this trade, they might be able
to trade their #2 pick plus the Oakland #3 for one of Atlanta's
early 2nd round picks. Atlanta is looking for a trade partner.
Last edited by Jimke; 04-09-2008 at 01:40 PM..
|
|
|