04-24-2009, 12:43 PM
|
#84
|
|
PatsFans.com Supporter
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,780
|
Re: Pats workout Gohlston
Quote:
Originally Posted by Synovia
I think, with a player of Gholston's suspected pass rushing talent, what the patriots demand of their LB on that side would change.
Belichick ran a 4-3 the first couple years because thats what his talent dictated. He's put players in all sorts of roles to suite their skills (the Rodney/Tank LB-Safety slot, etc). He's got a WILB thats much more mobile than any of his previous guys, so he can afford to have a slighly less mobile WLB. OR, he turns gholston into a DE and plays him like Jarvis. I just don't think the kid rides the pine.
|
Again, I agree with you that BB would have shown more flexibility than Mangini in using Gholston if he had him, and would have found ways to get productivity. Also, again, I think Gholston is a talented player, but a better DE than an OLB conversion candidate. I just don't think Gholston's skills were the best fit, and I think BB wasn't that serious about taking him. But I think BB could plug Eric Mangini in at OLB and get more productivity out of him than Mangini got out of Gholston last year.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid
"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi
|
|
|