Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
All the draft people put Chris Long at the top of the draft.
I'm beginning to wonder if he really is better than Gholston.
Granted ... all depends what you are looking for a player who
is more DE or more OLB. Watching both of them play and I'm not
totally convinced Long is a better DE than Gholston ... not in a slam
dunk kind of way anyways.
So, my question to this forum is: Do you think it's a slam dunk that Chris Long is a better pick than Vern Gholston if you need a DE?
I ask it that way because Gholston seems a slam dunk better at OLB than Long.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
All the draft people put Chris Long at the top of the draft.
I'm beginning to wonder if he really is better than Gholston.
Granted ... all depends what you are looking for a player who
is more DE or more OLB. Watching both of them play and I'm not
totally convinced Long is a better DE than Gholston ... not in a slam
dunk kind of way anyways.
So, my question to this forum is: Do you think it's a slam dunk that Chris Long is a better pick than Vern Gholston if you need a DE?
I ask it that way because Gholston seems a slam dunk better at OLB than Long.
i have seen long be called an OLB for a 3-4 scheme....what gives you the impression he is so bad at it?
__________________
Last time I lived in New England the Pats became a Dynasty
Long is a much better football player than Gholston. Better motor, MUCH better technique. While Gholston is more of a pure speed rusher with incredible strength (if that makes any sense), Long is a power DE with incredible athleticism. Gholston is an excellent prospect in his own right, but Long should be able to make a great impact from day 1.
IMO Long is better, and I don't think it's close. I wouldn't mind either though...
I'm not sold on them either transitioning to OLB. However, if I had to chose just one, it would be Gholston. He's strong, fast, and has a quick burst of the line. Lastly, I think Long might be too big to be a OLB. But the DE that looks to have the easiest transition from DE to LB is Quinton Groves from Auburn. I remember I watched him earlier this year and the announcers were saying how great he was, yet the only DE that was getting love was Gholston. Let me tell you, Groves is extremely quick off of the line and has the ability to change games. Also, he has played OLB during his time at Auburn, so switching to LB wouldn't be anything new to him. In addition, I think his 40 time was a 4.52 which is fast for a DE or LB. If the Pats can't get Gholston, I would love for them to trade down until they feel they have to take Groves.
Last edited by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?; 03-14-2008 at 11:03 PM..
i have seen long be called an OLB for a 3-4 scheme....what gives you the impression he is so bad at it?
Long played in a 3-4 as a DE and I can't recall seeing him ever line up as an OLB. He may turn out fine, but he would be a project...not a sure thing. At his worst, Gholston would be a beast off the edge in pass D and a liability in coverage and against the run. If you are looking for a 3-4 OLB, I think you take Gholston.
I'm not sold on them either transitioning to OLB. However, if I had to chose just one, it would be Gholston. He's strong, fast, and has a quick burst of the line. Lastly, I think Long might be too big to be a OLB. But the DE that looks to have the easiest transition from DE to LB is Quinton Groves from Auburn. I remember I watched him earlier this year and the announcers were saying how great he was, yet the only DE that was getting love was Gholston. Let me tell you, Groves is extremely quick off of the line and has the ability to change games. Also, he has played OLB during his time at Auburn, so switching to LB wouldn't be anything new to him. In addition, I think his 40 time was a 4.52 which is fast for a DE or LB. If the Pats can't get Gholston, I would love for them to trade down until they feel they have to take Groves.
Groves is my favorite option, if the Patriots can trade down.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
All the draft people put Chris Long at the top of the draft.
I'm beginning to wonder if he really is better than Gholston.
Granted ... all depends what you are looking for a player who
is more DE or more OLB. Watching both of them play and I'm not
totally convinced Long is a better DE than Gholston ... not in a slam
dunk kind of way anyways.
So, my question to this forum is: Do you think it's a slam dunk that Chris Long is a better pick than Vern Gholston if you need a DE?
I ask it that way because Gholston seems a slam dunk better at OLB than Long.
Truth be told,
1. Gholston is the better prospect
2. The fans love Chris Long more than the Pats do. Not saying they don't like him or wouldn't consider him at a certain point but they won't trade up for him. He's not a can't miss prospect to them and they like 7+ more options at this time. He's a great kid but it might shock some fans what direction they like best when it comes to Long and Gholston. By the way Chris won't be there at #7 and they won't trade up for him either so he will be moot and if he falls Chris Long fans better hope they don't have a very good trade down option because some fans might be in shock.
Both these guys have great potential but they are not "Slam Dunks" at the OLB position in the Pats minds right now until they give them both a BB workout. The problem is they have to be so much better than other options in this draft that would make the Pats move a Pro Bowl OLB who they paid well to the ILB and neither of these 2 have convinced them yet. They wont pick a 3rd down pass rush specialists with #7 and pay him to play 1 down. This is a good LB class, But there is no Patrick Willis emerging at this time.