PATRIOT64

I think this is a very distinct possibility and gives New England its 2 first round picks back and gives Dallas a shot for McFadden even though I think he may be gone by then.

There may be solid LBs or CBs available by the 22nd/28th and NE may be able to have 2 of the picks such as LBs Dan Connor and Curtis Lofton or CBs Leodis McKelvin,Antoine Cason (who I like a lot),Reggie Smith ect:

I think it would be a no brainer to do it if Dallas comes calling before the draft comes about - What is your opinion?

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

RayClay

In a New York minute.

__________________

patsox23

I DEFINITELY would. It's technically "not enough" by the Jimmy Johnson Chart, but a lot of people have said they need to revisit the value-system inherent in it. I'd love to make that deal, but the only way it happens is if McFadden falls to #7, which I consider doubtful.

ChoWZa

If they wait til McFadden is available @ #7 they could get a lot more in return. Plus getting Dallas #1 next year and one of their #1's this year is much more likely.

IcyPatriot

I would squeeze their 5th also ... got to get to 1500

JoePats

Yes in 2 seconds. But I still say the Jets are either going to take McFadden or make the same trade.

PATRIOT64

I agree,I think McFadden falls a bit but ends up with the Jets at #6

Chris Long is all locked up as a Miami Dolphin unless they are stupid enough to do a Ginn thing again this year and pick someone not suited for thier many weaknesses

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

patsox23

Good call. I expect, however, McFadden to fall to Oakland and go there. Unless they get smart all of a sudden and take Dallas up on that brutally stupid "BOTH #1's and Marion Barber" deal they've been floating.

Deus Irae

It really depends on what I thought of the OT's remaining on the board. If I thought one of those remaining was a top 10 talent, I'd keep the pick and sure up the line for both now and the future.

If the OT's didn't rate that highly in my mind, I'd trade for the two picks and a pick in next year's draft.

__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius

PATRIOT64

Deus Wouldn't you rather see a ILB and a CB or (2 of the same position) if we did the deal at 22 and 28 and then grab an OT in round 2,3 or 4 where tons of OTs in those rounds have been superb NFL players and instead press on the 2 areas where the team is weak right now in round 1?

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.