Xs and Os: adding a deep-threat WR to the "new" offense - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-17-2011, 12:47 AM   #1
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,567
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Xs and Os: adding a deep-threat WR to the "new" offense

Let me just throw this out to the crowd:

How could the Patriots go about adding a deep-threat WR to this offense without having it morph back into a "Pitch it to Randy Moss"-style offense?

Is that a function of the Patriots being 'seduced' by the big strike threat, or is it possible to have the 'best of both worlds' (and if it is, how do they do it)?
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-17-2011, 12:50 AM   #2
In the Starting Line-up
 
Keyser Söze's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Goffstown, NH
Posts: 2,044
My Mood: Buzzed
Send a message via Yahoo to Keyser Söze Send a message via Skype™ to Keyser Söze
Default Re: Xs and Os: adding a deep-threat WR to the "new" offense

Your wrong if you think the Pats don't need a WR who can go deep. The Jests showed how to beat this offense. They stacked the box because they knew they couldn't get beat deep.
Keyser Söze is offline  
Old 01-17-2011, 12:59 AM   #3
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
Dufflebagz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: One Patriot Place
Posts: 1,560
My Mood: Daring
Default Re: Xs and Os: adding a deep-threat WR to the "new" offense

It's very possible to have a deep threat WR in our offense. As long as he's not one that will b!tch if he doesn't get the ball 7 times a game he will just create a whole new dimesnsion in this offense.
__________________
McCourty has to earn his way back into my sig
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Dufflebagz is offline  
Old 01-17-2011, 01:03 AM   #4
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,567
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Xs and Os: adding a deep-threat WR to the "new" offense

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keyser Söze View Post
Your wrong if you think the Pats don't need a WR who can go deep. The Jests showed how to beat this offense. They stacked the box because they knew they couldn't get beat deep.
I didn't say that. My question is how do you incorporate such a player into this offense without wrecking it?
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline  
Old 01-17-2011, 01:09 AM   #5
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Sciz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5,913
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Xs and Os: adding a deep-threat WR to the "new" offense

I think the offense from benefit a guy, but who are we getting rid of to make room? Only 4 WRs made it active all season. Edelman is the PR, Tate is the KR, Welker and Branch are the starters. Price has shown potential, and could be that deep threat. But drafting a new WR means there's going to be two inactive WRs every week, and there's not room for that.
Sciz is online now  
Old 01-17-2011, 01:14 AM   #6
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 117
Default Re: Xs and Os: adding a deep-threat WR to the "new" offense

Price is going to be our answer next year, just watch.
ddanny1992 is offline  
Old 01-17-2011, 01:27 AM   #7
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Box_O_Rocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,550
Default Re: Xs and Os: adding a deep-threat WR to the "new" offense

I'm not sure a deep threat is enough, for whatever reason no one was getting open. I don't know if it was play design with the routes, poor execution by the receivers & Brady, great execution by the Jest ... and I'm not going to watch the game again.
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Box_O_Rocks is offline  
Old 01-17-2011, 01:31 AM   #8
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Sciz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5,913
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Xs and Os: adding a deep-threat WR to the "new" offense

Quote:
Originally Posted by Box_O_Rocks View Post
I'm not sure a deep threat is enough, for whatever reason no one was getting open. I don't know if it was play design with the routes, poor execution by the receivers & Brady, great execution by the Jest ... and I'm not going to watch the game again.
Exactly my problem. I want to know how they did it, but I have no intention of rewatching that game to find out...
Sciz is online now  
Old 01-17-2011, 01:34 AM   #9
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,567
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Xs and Os: adding a deep-threat WR to the "new" offense

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sciz View Post
Exactly my problem. I want to know how they did it, but I have no intention of rewatching that game to find out...
Well, the good news is that you know BB and TB will study that game and figure it out.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline  
Old 01-17-2011, 01:53 AM   #10
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
Wilfork#75's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,385
Default Re: Xs and Os: adding a deep-threat WR to the "new" offense

I think one of the main problems with this group of recievers is we lack a guy that can consistently go over the middle. Welker and Edleman mainly run underneath routes and gain yardage after the catch. Branch works best to the sidelines and Tate doesn't offer a whole lot as a WR at the moment. Hernandez and Gronkowski are the only reliable guys that run those intermediate routes over the middle which can make this team quite predictable.

My preference is to trade up above Stl and draft Julio Jones in the 1st because he seems like the perfect fit for the system. He offers a big target that can go over the middle, is an elite blocking WR and he is also a good deep threat. He is also a guy that you dont have to compromise the system for because he compliments it so well. He's not a diva and he comes from a high powered Alabama offence with a lot of weapons. So he wont complain if he doesnt get the ball. He's a really good team player and a great fit that would give this offence that extra dimension.
Wilfork#75 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Four teams emerge as "most interested in adding Moss". Pats... are.... KontradictioN PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 50 11-03-2010 04:24 PM
"Joe" the "Plumber": "McCain Used Me;" Obama "Honest Politician" PatsFanInVa Political Discussion 18 02-16-2010 08:12 PM
Shula: "Patriots", "Bonds", and "asterisk" in one sentence! --NY Daily News sam PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 53 11-06-2007 01:15 PM
The "Lets get back to football PLEASE!" threat theONLYJerseypatsfan PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 1 09-13-2007 06:49 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563