Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
PUNTING
Best: Oakland, 51.1 yards
Worst: New England, 39.0 yards
NET PUNTING
Best: Oakland, 43.9 yards
Worst: New England, 34.0 yards
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
PUNTING
Best: Oakland, 51.1 yards
Worst: New England, 39.0 yards
NET PUNTING
Best: Oakland, 43.9 yards
Worst: New England, 34.0 yards
Of course, that ignores the fact that if OAK is averaging 51 gross yards per punt, their average punting position must be no less than 51 yards from the EZ. . . .
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
PUNTING
Best: Oakland, 51.1 yards
Worst: New England, 39.0 yards
NET PUNTING
Best: Oakland, 43.9 yards
Worst: New England, 34.0 yards
Well, yes, but this topic is being argued all over the forum and these numbers never tell the entire story.
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me." To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Looking at JUST Net Punting Yards doesn't tell the whole story even remotely.
Like, for instance, how many punts inside the 20 the team had. Or how many punts were actually returned. There are so many flaws with the through process here that I'm not even sure where to begin. And it's kind of surprising coming from a veteran poster like yourself, Tony.
While those numbers don't tell the WHOLE story, you can't just throw them out altogether.
Lechler - 97 punts (51.1avg): 13% fair caught, 30 inside the 20, 8 inside the 10
Field Positon Stats here
Hanson - 56 punts (39.7avg): 28% fair caught, 18 inside the 20, 5 inside the 10
Field Position Stats here
Lechler has the advantage in having more field to punt to, but he is clearly a better punter.
__________________
NEPatriotsDraft.com, home of To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. analysis. Follow To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. and To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. .
Looking at JUST Net Punting Yards doesn't tell the whole story even remotely.
Like, for instance, how many punts inside the 20 the team had. Or how many punts were actually returned. There are so many flaws with the through process here that I'm not even sure where to begin. And it's kind of surprising coming from a veteran poster like yourself, Tony.
I agree but if your average punt only goes 40 yards, it should almost never be returnable. And when it is returned, the return guy shouldn't able to get very far. Unfortunately, that isn't the reality with Hanson. He has about one-third of his punts returned (which is good) for about a 10-yard average (which is not).
When asked to significantly change field position, Hanson generally can't pull it off. If he does go for distance (anything over 40 yards for him), it is flat with poor hangtime. When you punt from your 40 and the other team ends up near their 30, it puts pressure on the offense to get to midfield on almost every possession. When you punt from your 20 and the opposition starts on your side of the field, it is a gut punch to the defense.
All 3 phases need to work together. If the kicking game isn't pulling their weight, the other phases have to pick up the slack. This means trying to do more than they are able to do or the coaching staff not being able to run the gameplan they want.
With a boatload of late round picks (including comp picks that can't be traded), there really isn't an excuse not to bring in someone to replace Hanson.
Last edited by Metaphors; 02-14-2010 at 03:50 PM..
With a boatload of late round picks (including comp picks that can't be traded), there really isn't an excuse not to bring in someone to replace Hanson.
I would love to see the Patriots bring in Mike Brandtner (Iowa State) with one of their 7th round comp picks. He has all the tools that the Patriots look for (or seem to look for) in a Punter. Good hang time, accuracy, and is a very good holder. He only allowed like 35 yards of Punt returns all year.
__________________
NEPatriotsDraft.com, home of To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. analysis. Follow To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. and To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. .
While those numbers don't tell the WHOLE story, you can't just throw them out altogether.
Lechler - 97 punts (51.1avg): 13% fair caught, 30 inside the 20, 8 inside the 10
Field Positon Stats here
Hanson - 56 punts (39.7avg): 28% fair caught, 18 inside the 20, 5 inside the 10
Field Position Stats here
Lechler has the advantage in having more field to punt to, but he is clearly a better punter.
??? How do you get that? From those stats Hanson is the better punter. He has a higher percentage fair caught (28% vs 13%), higher percentage inside the 20 (32% vs 31%), and a higher percentage inside the 10 (9% vs 8%).
__________________
“When we look at the board, based on everything we want in a football player at that particular time, we evaluate them and take the player that fits best for our football team. That’s what we always do, and I think the last nine years we’ve put a pretty competitive team out there on the field every year. I think that’s how you do it – you get good football players. Sometimes they are not always at the No. 1 position, but I don’t think you pass up good football players to get the guys who aren’t as good just because they’re at a position that somebody feels you need.”
BB on his draft philosophy, April 2010
Last edited by spacecrime; 02-14-2010 at 04:11 PM..