Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2009, 01:11 PM   #11
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,535
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cstjohn17 View Post
IMO RBs fall because they are a dime a dozen (unless they are named AP). Looking across the league decent veteran free agent RBs can be had easily and cheaply every offseason. I would much rather spend a first round pick on the offensive or defensive lines, CB or DE. These positions are critical and usually end up costing big dollars in free agency.
I agree, look at Green Ellis for instance. I have said since the preseaon that Green Ellis should play and Maroney grab some pine. If Green Ellis works on his blocking and receiving, he could be the RB we have lacked since Dillion.
Ochmed Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 206

Updated 2/4/10

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 10-07-2009, 01:21 PM   #12
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 9,797
Default Re: College Football: Running Commentary

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ochmed Jones View Post
I agree, look at Green Ellis for instance. I have said since the preseaon that Green Ellis should play and Maroney grab some pine. If Green Ellis works on his blocking and receiving, he could be the RB we have lacked since Dillion.
Then why did BB, who had no qualms with benching Galloway, deactivate BJGE instead?
__________________
LOCK UP THE GHOST. NOW.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 02:21 PM   #13
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
mayoclinic's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 5,950
Default Re: College Football: Running Commentary

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ochmed Jones View Post
I agree, look at Green Ellis for instance. I have said since the preseaon that Green Ellis should play and Maroney grab some pine. If Green Ellis works on his blocking and receiving, he could be the RB we have lacked since Dillion.
Or the RB we have lacked since Cedric Cobbs.

Come on, BJGE bears no resemblance to Corey Dillon and never will. Stop the hyperbole. Mount Cody the "greatest college NT of all time". Law Firm another Corey Dillon. He's never shown yet that he can produce consistently against starting competition. He's done ok in his limited opportunities, I grant you, but I don't see any reason for the absurd hyperbole. Sounds like something the Jets or Ravens fans would do.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result." Albert Einstein
mayoclinic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 10:10 PM   #14
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,618
Default Re: College Football: Running Commentary

LSU vs. Florida, Spikes had a good game. I am sure there are a lot of haters but this guy is a player, lined up at DE quite a bit and showed more versatility than I had thought. I had him stereotyped as a pure MLB now I think he could play any LB position.

Also #2 from Florida, Demps can really fly. He may be too small to play in the NFL but is fun to watch.
cstjohn17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 07:00 AM   #15
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,618
Default Re: College Football: Running Commentary

Quote:
Originally Posted by cstjohn17 View Post
LSU vs. Florida, Spikes had a good game. I am sure there are a lot of haters but this guy is a player, lined up at DE quite a bit and showed more versatility than I had thought. I had him stereotyped as a pure MLB now I think he could play any LB position.

Also #2 from Florida, Demps can really fly. He may be too small to play in the NFL but is fun to watch.
Also Hayden looked good at CB
cstjohn17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 11:56 PM   #16
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 238
Default Re: College Football: Running Commentary

Quote:
Originally Posted by cstjohn17 View Post
Also Hayden looked good at CB
...and there are people around the UF program who will tell you that he's not even the best corner on the team, that true sophomore Janoris Jenkins is better.

Would not surprise me at all if they were both first round picks down the line.
Gator Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 01:43 PM   #17
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
condon84's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,385
Default Re: College Football: Running Commentary

We need pass rushers. Anyone stick out? How is George Selvie doing for South Florida? I haven't seen any of their games.
condon84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 10:01 PM   #18
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 307
Default Re: College Football: Running Commentary

Several comments, since I'm way behind on my updates.

First, though, I ran across this bit of excessive praise for a player I've been intrigued by for a while: AUSTEN LANE IS ON THE RIGHT ROAD TO NFL STARDOM | Bleacher Report

What really stood out to me was that after he bulked up to over 250, he became far more effective. Consider these stats for his 2008 season: he thrives in pass coverage (gives up an average of roughly 1.2 yards per attempt, and only allowed one first down), and has performed exceptionally well against the run (opponents running directly at him gained -90 yards). Oh, and for my fellow number freaks, take a look at his 6.7 three cone time. That is ridiculous for a 6'6, 270# defensive lineman. As I said, this article is alarmingly obsequious, but I do like this guy as a mid-late round sleeper.

Another guy I've wanted to watch for a while, Lindsey Witten, is also an athletic pass-rusher with good size (6'4, 258#) and great quickness. I believe he already has 10 sacks this year, which is slightly less impressive than it sounds, given that 7 of them came in the first 2 games of the year. I prefer consistency from pass-rushers, not feast or famine. That said, I couldn't believe how fast and explosive he looks off the snap. He has excellent flexibility, changes direction fluidly, and generally looks very quick and confident. I think he could play well in space. I wasn't a fan, however, of his continual tendency to get engaged in drawn-out battles with blockers. He needs to shed the blocker and make the play, not dance around. To be honest, he looked like an exact replica of Aaron Maybin, and I'm not sure whether that's a good thing.

I didn't get to see much, but I watched a few of Von Miller's plays, and he is another guy with lightening-quick movements. I think he's too small for our scheme (6'3, 240#), but I could have sworn I was watching Clay Matthews back in the college game. Scrappy player, and I wish him well in a one-gap, attacking scheme.

I also watched Romeus again, because I like how hard he plays, but once more I came away with the feeling that he's a true 43 end, not a OLB conversion project. I do think he'll be a great player, but I just don't think he has the foot speed necessary to play in space.

Starting to notice a trend? I like pass-rushers, and I think we need one next year, with Thomas and Burgess most likely gone. I like Hardy a good bit, but his inconsistency baffles me. He's so ferocious sometimes, much like Larry English but with far greater size and athleticism. (I keep comparing this class to last year, because even though I've followed the draft for a while, last year was the first time I spent several months systematically scouting out prospects.) I honestly believe that BB could turn him into one of the greatest pass-rushers of all time, but I fear that either 1) he's gone before we pick, or 2) his attitude causes teams to shy away from him, and we pass him up over concern for his effort. What do you think, is likely to fall like Michael Johnson, or do you think Dunlap will take that dubious award?

I've made a point of watching Rolando McClain whenever possible, and I'm convinced he's the best LB prospect I've seen in the few year I've followed the draft. I'd love to see him alternate between playing inside and outside in the 43, 34, and nickel subpackages. I can't say anything about him that people haven't already heard. He's just terrific.

Several running backs have also piqued my interest this year, but none of them are draft-eligible, so I'll just file them away for future consideration, especially since Maroney and Law-Firm could be a great tandem for us going forward.

I'm still trying to find a defensive tackle prospect to get excited about. Other than Suh, who is obviously way out of our range (and possibly would play better in a penetrating 43, anyway), I am not terribly impressed with anyone in this class. Maybe I'm just too picky, but I really want a Seymour replacement. I don't think Green is resigned next year, for some reason, and I have a strange feeling Wilfork may be tagged and traded. Can Brace play the nose? He's barely seen the field all year, sadly.

Keep up the great discussions, everyone. I love hearing your thoughts. Next up, I'm going to attempt to profile a few cornerbacks who look like they have the skills necessary to hold up in our system. Several have already caught my eye . . .

Last edited by reamer; 10-24-2009 at 11:30 PM.
reamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 10:45 PM   #19
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 9,797
Default Re: College Football: Running Commentary

Quote:
Originally Posted by reamer View Post
and I think we need one next year, with Thomas and Burgess most likely gone.
Can we at least give Thomas one more game before we project him being cut next year?
__________________
LOCK UP THE GHOST. NOW.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 10:47 PM   #20
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 334
Default Re: College Football: Running Commentary

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77 View Post
Can we at least give Thomas one more game before we project him being cut next year?
Was about to post the same thing
Marqui is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
College Football scout Political Discussion 3 11-22-2004 02:49 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

© Copyright 2008 PatsFans.com - The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com or our staff.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445