01-17-2013, 11:20 AM
|
#28
|
|
In the Starting Line-up
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,662
|
Re: Sound FX: Houston at New England (Tom MF Brady)
Quote:
Originally Posted by shmessy
Yes, he did. And I believe it was the very same route. Despite what Simms said, it should have been called both times.
|
The rules do prohibit driving through a defender who has established position (so you are technically correct) but I doubt officials want to start being in the business of calling "charges" on receivers. The NBA officials have the damnest time doing it now. Once you reward that behavior, defenders will become soccer players and start flopping around like they were shot by a cannon every time a receiver brushes by them.
The 2nd one was completely different in that Hernandez extended his arms and the "charge" became a "shove'...which is a no-brainer for officials to call. Don't mean to pee in your Cheerios but I think the "driving through a defender with position" rule is one of those situations they don't call unless the receiver goes out of his way to make contact or the contact is excessive. I didn't see either in the first route.
If my assessment the non-call is correct, I have to say that I totally agree with that decision by the refs. It would suck to see a line of 8-9 defenders lined up just in front of the first down line on 3rd down and falling down like dominoes as receivers ran by.
Last edited by Metaphors; 01-17-2013 at 11:30 AM..
|
|
|