randomk1

Don't worry. Manning will dominate the AFC West once again and will guide his team to a high seed.

Then he will be back in the GOAT discussion.

__________________
Three out of Four. Back-to-back.

Halifax_Pats_Fan

Exactly right...?

I mean i could not image the salaries they get for providing such a mis-informed, mis-guided obviously jaded view of Tom Brady.

I mean it is so obvious, and he gets paid good money to be biased.

It is almost like, and I hate to say it, FOX.

*shudder*

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


It is what it is - BB

DarrylStingley

It's amusing to see what a Pats hater Faulk is. And the contrast between him and his SB QB couldn't be greater. Kurt Warner never passes on an opportunity to praise the Pats to the sky. What an amazing difference!

Armchair Quarterback

He is a weird guy, he looks weird and he acts weird. He's one of those people that makes any situation uncomfortable. That and he's a simpleton - can barely speak the English language.

To sum it up he's a weird, awkward simpleton with a grudge. Who gives a **** what he thinks.

Mainefan

I have yet to hear Marshall Faulk say anything intelligent. This remark keeps his string intact.

BadMoFo

Well there is pressure on Brady because he's gonna only have a few more years left of playing. Then again, there is pressure on all four QBs since this is a single-elimination tournament.

jmt57

Marshall Faulk had actually come around this past year, and was generally positive about the Patriots this season.

As for the remark about Brady, that's a rather superficial opinion. Win or lose he has always been ultra competitive, and regardless of the stakes (or outcome) he has never succumbed to 'pressure'.

As for his legacy on whether the Pats win or lose this game - or the next one, if they win Sunday - I get the distinct impression that is the furthest thing from his mind. Brady, Belichick and the team is focused strictly on the task at hand and winning that game - period.

If a professional player is thinking about his legacy then they are bound to not be focused on the game - and more likely will lose. If that was the case with Brady then he and the Patriots would not have made it this far.

The pressure aspect is more on the fans and the haters; depending on the outcome it makes it either easier or more difficult to present their case.

PATSYLICIOUS

Faulk has a valid point. If Brady were truly a great QB, he would choke in the first playoff game every year like Manning rather than leading him team to or near a Super Bowl.

__________________
Organized madness
The young Gott-stra
Young Frank Sinatra

Rob0729

Whatever Marshall Faulk says about the Pats believe the opposite. Faulk's hatred for the Pats is so obvious that even Rich Eisen mocks him on the air for some of his anti-Patriots rants.

Ivan

By this logic losing Conference Championships makes for a better QB than winning them. Brady is 5-1 in Conference Championship games and Montana 4-3. Losing in the semifinals doesn't make a QB better than those who win them. If Brady gets another ring then he is the GOAT, even though he still has a good 4 years left to build on it. He will be tied with Montana in rings and have the advantage on him in pretty much every other category.