A little early, but: should the Patriots try to re-sign Wes Welker? - Page 28 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree64Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-04-2013, 02:41 PM   #271
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
robertweathers's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Central MA by way of the great state of New Hampshire
Posts: 7,378
Default Re: A little early, but: should the Patriots try to re-sign Wes Welker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATippett56 View Post
Wes Welker has out performed Hernandez and Gronkowski in each of the last three seasons in terms of pass receptions and pass receiving yards. Wes Welker also has missed only four regular season games in his entire career.
All true however I think 2011 showed that the Pats are just as interested in throwing to Gronk and AH as they are to WW.

In terms of stats, Gronk has averaged more YPC and has almost twice as many TDs as WW which tells you that the team would rather see the ball in Gronk's hands more than WW because of his big-play ability...
__________________
“I'm not really concerned about the other 31 teams,” - Bill Belichick

"If a player has talent and doesn't succeed, that means that they either don't want to be successful or I have failed as a coach." - Bill Belichick
robertweathers is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-04-2013, 02:42 PM   #272
All Pro Poster
 
JackBauer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NoVA
Posts: 12,987
Default Re: A little early, but: should the Patriots try to re-sign Wes Welker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by robertweathers View Post
With Vereen, Demps, Ridley and Bolden already slated to be in the 2013 backfield? If he wants more than what the Pats value him for then he will be gone.
Given that Woodhead's better than everyone on that list not named Ridley, yes.
JackBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 02:46 PM   #273
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
robertweathers's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Central MA by way of the great state of New Hampshire
Posts: 7,378
Default Re: A little early, but: should the Patriots try to re-sign Wes Welker?

I'm well aware of Seabass's back woes. However as long as they can correct his issue and it is not degenerative, he is a potential Pro-Bowl RT whose value to the team is superior to Woody's where at the position is a tremendous amount of depth.

For any reason if they do let Seabass walk (health or $$), that doesn't necessarily mean that he is a lower priority signing. It means that they can't or won't bring him back.
__________________
“I'm not really concerned about the other 31 teams,” - Bill Belichick

"If a player has talent and doesn't succeed, that means that they either don't want to be successful or I have failed as a coach." - Bill Belichick
robertweathers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 02:48 PM   #274
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
robertweathers's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Central MA by way of the great state of New Hampshire
Posts: 7,378
Default Re: A little early, but: should the Patriots try to re-sign Wes Welker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aluminum seats View Post
Fair enough on the first point. I would say that's something the Pats have gotten better at over the years--if they had been proactive with Branch back in the day, they probably would have beaten the Colts and won another Super Bowl that year.
Sadly, you are spot on in both comments...

Quote:
Originally Posted by aluminum seats View Post
The second point might just be a question of semantics. Doesn't seem worth quibbling about, at any rate.
Yep thats cool.
__________________
“I'm not really concerned about the other 31 teams,” - Bill Belichick

"If a player has talent and doesn't succeed, that means that they either don't want to be successful or I have failed as a coach." - Bill Belichick
robertweathers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 02:49 PM   #275
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
ATippett56's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,075
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: A little early, but: should the Patriots try to re-sign Wes Welker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by robertweathers View Post
All true however I think 2011 showed that the Pats are just as interested in throwing to Gronk and AH as they are to WW.
Oh really?

Wes Welker led the NFL in receptions during the 2011 NFL Season.

Wes Welker NFL Football Statistics - Pro-Football-Reference.com
__________________
The End of the Chad Ochostinko Era!
ATippett56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 02:49 PM   #276
Practice Squad
 
Creative Username's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 212
Default We should be able to re-sign Welker

In order for this team to make a run at the Superbowl for years to come, we need a stable offense, run by a happy Tom Brady. A happy Tom Brady needs Wes Welker. He moves the chains better than anyone and he's the go-to guy on third down when we need a conversion (although you could argue Woodhead has been amazingly clutch for us in 3rd and forever situations multiple times this year). He had 118 catches for 1351 yards and 6 TDs for a team with 5 receivers who had over 40 catches, (Welker, Gronk, AHern, Lloyd and Woody) which is amazing production taking into account how much TB spreads the ball around. Plus, after posting his record-breaking 6th season with 100+ catches and passing Michael Irvin for career receptions (as a measure of his greatness) the league pays him no mind. You hear about Cutler and Marshall's great chemistry, and Wayne's revival in Indy with Andrew Luck, and Megatron's record breaking season. All of these guys have made Welker's season seem like small potatoes, and it doesn't help that he's done it for the past five years. This kind of output is expected, so it's not a huge deal. If Welker's looking for huge money, and tries to find it outside of NE, I doubt he'll have much success just because of the recognition that no one's giving him. He puts up the numbers year after year, and does so quietly. In the end, that might be best for us.

I'm thinking 3-4 years 28-36M
__________________
If Dante Scarnecchia doesn't work his magic on the O-line...

Brady=
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Creative Username is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 02:52 PM   #277
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
robertweathers's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Central MA by way of the great state of New Hampshire
Posts: 7,378
Default Re: A little early, but: should the Patriots try to re-sign Wes Welker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATippett56 View Post
Oh really?

Wes Welker led the NFL in receptions during the 2011 NFL Season.

Wes Welker NFL Football Statistics - Pro-Football-Reference.com
They are just as interested in throwing to AH and Gronk as both players caught 79 and 90 balls respectfully and were highly productive. If they weren't, then they wouldn't have received big-money extensions or given major roles in the offense. I didn't say they were more productive although you can argue that Gronk was in 2011.
__________________
“I'm not really concerned about the other 31 teams,” - Bill Belichick

"If a player has talent and doesn't succeed, that means that they either don't want to be successful or I have failed as a coach." - Bill Belichick
robertweathers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 03:04 PM   #278
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
ATippett56's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,075
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: A little early, but: should the Patriots try to re-sign Wes Welker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by robertweathers View Post
For any reason if they do let Seabass walk (health or $$), that doesn't necessarily mean that he is a lower priority signing. It means that they can't or won't bring him back.
Provided the New England Patriots re-sign Welker and Edelman, the New England Patriots do not have overwhelming needs on offense with regard to the 2013 NFL Draft aside from potentially an offensive tackle (who has experience in college playing both left tackle and right tackle).

The following denotes offensive players currently contract for the 2013 NFL Season:

Quarterbacks

Brady
Mallett

Halfbacks

Ridley
Vereen
Bolden
Demps (currently on Injured Reserve)

Fullbacks

Larsen (currently on Injured Reserve)
Fiammetta (currently on Reserve/Exempt)

Tight Ends

Gronkowski
Hernandez
Fells
Ballard (currently on PUP)
Herman (currently on Injured Reserve)
Hoomanawanui (RFA)

Wide Receivers

Lloyd
Slater

Offensive Tackles

Solder
Cannon
Zusevics
Hix (currently on Injured Reserve)

Offensive Guards

Mankins
Connolly

Offensive Centers

Wendell
McDonald
__________________
The End of the Chad Ochostinko Era!

Last edited by ATippett56; 01-04-2013 at 03:31 PM..
ATippett56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 03:31 PM   #279
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
supafly's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 8,271
Default Re: A little early, but: should the Patriots try to re-sign Wes Welker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Brandon Five View Post
What are they?
What are the alternatives to parting with Talib, you ask?

There are certainly plenty of possibilities. They could draft another CB or even 2 in the upcoming draft. They could seek out a more cap friendly free agent CB to pair outside with Dennard. They could essentially even make a trade if it came down to it (admittedly not likely).

They could draft a safety or 2 in the deep safety class of the 2013 draft and pair him up with McCourty. They could move McCourty back to CB and pair the newly drafted safety up with anyone of Wilson, Gregory, or even an additional safety who isn't even on the team yet. They can acquire another safety via the free agency route.

They could even retain Arrington and have him as a starter capable player in a pinch, although we'd all rather see him in the slot of course.

They can even (gasp) try and utilize their #33rd overall pick in the 2011 draft in Ras-I-Dowling if they feel an additional year may be beneficial to his growth.

We've certainly made due with worse in the past, and although I am not really wanting to part with Talib, if the price isn't right you've got to consider the alternatives...and I would imagine that they will certainly do so in every way possible should they not be able to reach a fair deal.

Stating that there are not alternatives is incorrect, there certainly are.

The defense improved to the point where they allowed approx.17 pts per game in the month of December, yet Aqib Talib didn't even play 50% of those reps in this past month. He played vs MIA, and only the first half vs HOU. He also played a little in the 49'ers game before he couldn't go anymore IIRC. Either way, he didn't play all that much this month and yet they somehow still managed.

I am not meaning to undervalue him either, I think he'd be great for the future. I am only stating that we could get by, and that there certainly are alternatives.
__________________
Patiently waiting to defend the next "bubble" player in this summer's training camp.....
supafly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 03:43 PM   #280
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
PatsFan2's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,642
Default Re: A little early, but: should the Patriots try to re-sign Wes Welker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATippett56 View Post
Provided the New England Patriots re-sign Welker and Edelman, the New England Patriots do not have overwhelming needs on offense with regard to the 2013 NFL Draft aside from potentially an offensive tackle (who has experience in college playing both left tackle and right tackle).
How about WR who can consistently threaten the deep part of the field or a consistent outside the numbers Threat? Brandon Lloyd is a complementary WR at best...in 2013 I woudn't feel comfortable with him alone as our lone outside threat. The Pats Offense do most of their damage over the middle, we need to mix it up more on the outsides...Our Offense is Very Good but Not complete. As good we are inside the numbes some Teams like Greenbay -Atlanta and the Saints are Great outside the numbers.

Last edited by PatsFan2; 01-04-2013 at 03:44 PM..
PatsFan2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566