ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Location: Central MA by way of the great state of New Hampshire
Posts: 7,378
Re: A little early, but: should the Patriots try to re-sign Wes Welker?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATippett56
Wes Welker has out performed Hernandez and Gronkowski in each of the last three seasons in terms of pass receptions and pass receiving yards. Wes Welker also has missed only four regular season games in his entire career.
All true however I think 2011 showed that the Pats are just as interested in throwing to Gronk and AH as they are to WW.
In terms of stats, Gronk has averaged more YPC and has almost twice as many TDs as WW which tells you that the team would rather see the ball in Gronk's hands more than WW because of his big-play ability...
__________________
“I'm not really concerned about the other 31 teams,” - Bill Belichick
"If a player has talent and doesn't succeed, that means that they either don't want to be successful or I have failed as a coach." - Bill Belichick
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: A little early, but: should the Patriots try to re-sign Wes Welker?
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertweathers
With Vereen, Demps, Ridley and Bolden already slated to be in the 2013 backfield? If he wants more than what the Pats value him for then he will be gone.
Given that Woodhead's better than everyone on that list not named Ridley, yes.
I'm well aware of Seabass's back woes. However as long as they can correct his issue and it is not degenerative, he is a potential Pro-Bowl RT whose value to the team is superior to Woody's where at the position is a tremendous amount of depth.
For any reason if they do let Seabass walk (health or $$), that doesn't necessarily mean that he is a lower priority signing. It means that they can't or won't bring him back.
__________________
“I'm not really concerned about the other 31 teams,” - Bill Belichick
"If a player has talent and doesn't succeed, that means that they either don't want to be successful or I have failed as a coach." - Bill Belichick
Location: Central MA by way of the great state of New Hampshire
Posts: 7,378
Re: A little early, but: should the Patriots try to re-sign Wes Welker?
Quote:
Originally Posted by aluminum seats
Fair enough on the first point. I would say that's something the Pats have gotten better at over the years--if they had been proactive with Branch back in the day, they probably would have beaten the Colts and won another Super Bowl that year.
Sadly, you are spot on in both comments...
Quote:
Originally Posted by aluminum seats
The second point might just be a question of semantics. Doesn't seem worth quibbling about, at any rate.
Yep thats cool.
__________________
“I'm not really concerned about the other 31 teams,” - Bill Belichick
"If a player has talent and doesn't succeed, that means that they either don't want to be successful or I have failed as a coach." - Bill Belichick
In order for this team to make a run at the Superbowl for years to come, we need a stable offense, run by a happy Tom Brady. A happy Tom Brady needs Wes Welker. He moves the chains better than anyone and he's the go-to guy on third down when we need a conversion (although you could argue Woodhead has been amazingly clutch for us in 3rd and forever situations multiple times this year). He had 118 catches for 1351 yards and 6 TDs for a team with 5 receivers who had over 40 catches, (Welker, Gronk, AHern, Lloyd and Woody) which is amazing production taking into account how much TB spreads the ball around. Plus, after posting his record-breaking 6th season with 100+ catches and passing Michael Irvin for career receptions (as a measure of his greatness) the league pays him no mind. You hear about Cutler and Marshall's great chemistry, and Wayne's revival in Indy with Andrew Luck, and Megatron's record breaking season. All of these guys have made Welker's season seem like small potatoes, and it doesn't help that he's done it for the past five years. This kind of output is expected, so it's not a huge deal. If Welker's looking for huge money, and tries to find it outside of NE, I doubt he'll have much success just because of the recognition that no one's giving him. He puts up the numbers year after year, and does so quietly. In the end, that might be best for us.
I'm thinking 3-4 years 28-36M
__________________
If Dante Scarnecchia doesn't work his magic on the O-line...
Brady= To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
They are just as interested in throwing to AH and Gronk as both players caught 79 and 90 balls respectfully and were highly productive. If they weren't, then they wouldn't have received big-money extensions or given major roles in the offense. I didn't say they were more productive although you can argue that Gronk was in 2011.
__________________
“I'm not really concerned about the other 31 teams,” - Bill Belichick
"If a player has talent and doesn't succeed, that means that they either don't want to be successful or I have failed as a coach." - Bill Belichick
Re: A little early, but: should the Patriots try to re-sign Wes Welker?
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertweathers
For any reason if they do let Seabass walk (health or $$), that doesn't necessarily mean that he is a lower priority signing. It means that they can't or won't bring him back.
Provided the New England Patriots re-sign Welker and Edelman, the New England Patriots do not have overwhelming needs on offense with regard to the 2013 NFL Draft aside from potentially an offensive tackle (who has experience in college playing both left tackle and right tackle).
The following denotes offensive players currently contract for the 2013 NFL Season:
Quarterbacks
Brady
Mallett
Halfbacks
Ridley
Vereen
Bolden
Demps (currently on Injured Reserve)
Fullbacks
Larsen (currently on Injured Reserve)
Fiammetta (currently on Reserve/Exempt)
Tight Ends
Gronkowski Hernandez
Fells
Ballard (currently on PUP)
Herman (currently on Injured Reserve)
Hoomanawanui (RFA)
Wide Receivers
Lloyd
Slater
Offensive Tackles
Solder
Cannon
Zusevics
Hix (currently on Injured Reserve)
Offensive Guards
Mankins Connolly
Offensive Centers
Wendell
McDonald
__________________
The End of the Chad Ochostinko Era!
Last edited by ATippett56; 01-04-2013 at 03:31 PM..
Re: A little early, but: should the Patriots try to re-sign Wes Welker?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Brandon Five
What are they?
What are the alternatives to parting with Talib, you ask?
There are certainly plenty of possibilities. They could draft another CB or even 2 in the upcoming draft. They could seek out a more cap friendly free agent CB to pair outside with Dennard. They could essentially even make a trade if it came down to it (admittedly not likely).
They could draft a safety or 2 in the deep safety class of the 2013 draft and pair him up with McCourty. They could move McCourty back to CB and pair the newly drafted safety up with anyone of Wilson, Gregory, or even an additional safety who isn't even on the team yet. They can acquire another safety via the free agency route.
They could even retain Arrington and have him as a starter capable player in a pinch, although we'd all rather see him in the slot of course.
They can even (gasp) try and utilize their #33rd overall pick in the 2011 draft in Ras-I-Dowling if they feel an additional year may be beneficial to his growth.
We've certainly made due with worse in the past, and although I am not really wanting to part with Talib, if the price isn't right you've got to consider the alternatives...and I would imagine that they will certainly do so in every way possible should they not be able to reach a fair deal.
Stating that there are not alternatives is incorrect, there certainly are.
The defense improved to the point where they allowed approx.17 pts per game in the month of December, yet Aqib Talib didn't even play 50% of those reps in this past month. He played vs MIA, and only the first half vs HOU. He also played a little in the 49'ers game before he couldn't go anymore IIRC. Either way, he didn't play all that much this month and yet they somehow still managed.
I am not meaning to undervalue him either, I think he'd be great for the future. I am only stating that we could get by, and that there certainly are alternatives.
__________________
Patiently waiting to defend the next "bubble" player in this summer's training camp.....
Re: A little early, but: should the Patriots try to re-sign Wes Welker?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATippett56
Provided the New England Patriots re-sign Welker and Edelman, the New England Patriots do not have overwhelming needs on offense with regard to the 2013 NFL Draft aside from potentially an offensive tackle (who has experience in college playing both left tackle and right tackle).
How about WR who can consistently threaten the deep part of the field or a consistent outside the numbers Threat? Brandon Lloyd is a complementary WR at best...in 2013 I woudn't feel comfortable with him alone as our lone outside threat. The Pats Offense do most of their damage over the middle, we need to mix it up more on the outsides...Our Offense is Very Good but Not complete. As good we are inside the numbes some Teams like Greenbay -Atlanta and the Saints are Great outside the numbers.