If Ridley continues to improve and Vereen shows growth..... - Page 4 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree20Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-27-2012, 11:43 AM   #31
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ForThoseAboutToRock's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 805
Default Re: If Ridley continues to improve and Vereen shows growth.....

If you were offered the ability to trade all of your RB depth for durable HOF quality, would you do it? I'm thinking of something like "what if 1996 Curtis Martin were available for this trade?"

You have to balance the issue of depth (lets assume the star RB doesn't miss significant time due to injury, which Curtis Martin didn't until his last season) versus having that one guy with the ability to produce in every game he laces em up - but the only backups available would be a massive drop off.

You can't give 1 back every carry for the whole season, so is it worth it to have the drop off?

If you have a running back by committee, then you have to rely on your personnel dept. to keep the cabinet stocked as the BJGE's get big(ish) contracts and move on. You'd also have to weigh-in the fact that your Curtis Martin quality RB would be expensive in his late 20's... would certainly affect how you would expend the remaining resources available for the rest of the guys on the cap.
ForThoseAboutToRock is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 11-27-2012, 04:34 PM   #32
Thread Ignore Champion
 
ausbacker's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,937
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: If Ridley continues to improve and Vereen shows growth.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForThoseAboutToRock View Post
If you were offered the ability to trade all of your RB depth for durable HOF quality, would you do it? I'm thinking of something like "what if 1996 Curtis Martin were available for this trade?"

You have to balance the issue of depth (lets assume the star RB doesn't miss significant time due to injury, which Curtis Martin didn't until his last season) versus having that one guy with the ability to produce in every game he laces em up - but the only backups available would be a massive drop off.

You can't give 1 back every carry for the whole season, so is it worth it to have the drop off?

If you have a running back by committee, then you have to rely on your personnel dept. to keep the cabinet stocked as the BJGE's get big(ish) contracts and move on. You'd also have to weigh-in the fact that your Curtis Martin quality RB would be expensive in his late 20's... would certainly affect how you would expend the remaining resources available for the rest of the guys on the cap.
To be honest, I am really pleased with the RB brigade. Ridley, Vereen, Woodhead, Bolden and Demps will all offer the Patriots something different over the next few years. It's been an amazing effort to collect that depth of talent.
and like this.
ausbacker is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 01:40 AM   #33
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
supafly's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 8,085
Default Re: If Ridley continues to improve and Vereen shows growth.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by ausbacker View Post
To be honest, I am really pleased with the RB brigade. Ridley, Vereen, Woodhead, Bolden and Demps will all offer the Patriots something different over the next few years. It's been an amazing effort to collect that depth of talent.
Oh, absolutely. I couldn't agree more. Many seemed to be worried about a lack of much of a vet-presence this year, but it never really trickled down to me. I loved this group of backs going in.

Keeping Woodhead (who I keep forgetting is a FA) would be a great move, and I would hope that they can agree on something very fair and easy in the big picture.

As mayoclinic points out, those players that can really contribute to the "move" offense like Woodhead, Edelman, Welker, Vereen, Ridley, and Hernandez are extremely important going forward. Demps and an additional player or two via the draft/FA would help to replace the loss of one or two of those players, and could potentially make this into something even greater next year.

We have done a much better job of solidifying the trenches on the offensive line and with the power TE acquisitions, which allows to play more physically. Having the potential to beat them with speed, agility, shiftiness, and a high pace of hurry-up only leads to the best of both worlds in every way.

I would imagine Edelman definitely being a part of the bigger picture of the future here for multiple reasons, not to mention the fact that it won't likely take as much money to do so either.

Welker is the biggest question mark, and to me--Woodhead is somewhat of an unknown due to various reasons such as need, desire to stay by both sides, and potential contract asking price. I wouldn't expect them to be interested in anything more than 2 million per, possibly even slightly less.
__________________
Patiently waiting to defend the next "bubble" player in this summer's training camp.....
supafly is online now  
Old 11-28-2012, 01:52 AM   #34
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
supafly's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 8,085
Default Re: If Ridley continues to improve and Vereen shows growth.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by mayoclinic View Post
I was one of the earliest Doug Martin fans on this board, and wanted the Pats to take him. Thought he was the real deal, and thought he would be a perfect fit for our offense - and I still think that.
Funny you should mention that because he was my very first RB taken in our fantasy draft, over all of the other well-known names out there. Just about everyone literally laughed at my choice, particularly due to it being so early on, but I wasn't going to chance losing out on him under any circumstance.

Doug Martin is certainly something special, and the fact that they manage to get him some great looks with screens/RB passes out of the backfield is even better, as he's proven several times to take a short little gainer 75 yards to the house.

Tampa Bay certainly looks to have their immediate dual-threat RB of the future. He has produced much more than LeSean McCoy or Ray Rice have this season in only his first year in the league.

I don't see Belichick changing his M.O. any time soon though, especially as Ridley has proven to be a great pickup for the lead carry role, and the others have added their stamp on their assignments and responsibilities.

Having a RBBC system offers the best of both worlds due to the fact that it allows us to be able to do just about everything in any given situation as others may be better at certain aspects. It also allows for great depth at the position in the meantime.

I think the thing that some do not realize is that we probably have at least one/two "homerun" threats currently on the team right now. There's no way that I'd want to see a trade done for any elite RB's, there's absolutely no need for it. We've got great monetary value contract-wise, great depth, and the ability to change pace with various roles. They are all also very young and probably haven't reached their ceiling yet, besides maybe Woodhead.

For those who'd want one of the pricey-RB's who have the ability to take it to the house on any given play, I remind you of the Matt Forte talk in the offseason...

The production, depth, and monetary steal that we get at the position is likely one of the best in the entire NFL and is probably only going to get better.
__________________
Patiently waiting to defend the next "bubble" player in this summer's training camp.....

Last edited by supafly; 11-28-2012 at 01:53 AM..
supafly is online now  
Old 11-28-2012, 05:49 AM   #35
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
mayoclinic's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,780
Default Re: If Ridley continues to improve and Vereen shows growth.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by supafly View Post
Funny you should mention that because he was my very first RB taken in our fantasy draft, over all of the other well-known names out there. Just about everyone literally laughed at my choice, particularly due to it being so early on, but I wasn't going to chance losing out on him under any circumstance.

Doug Martin is certainly something special, and the fact that they manage to get him some great looks with screens/RB passes out of the backfield is even better, as he's proven several times to take a short little gainer 75 yards to the house.

Tampa Bay certainly looks to have their immediate dual-threat RB of the future. He has produced much more than LeSean McCoy or Ray Rice have this season in only his first year in the league.
From Ye Old Mocke Draft Thread (2012 version):

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayoclinic"
*** Trade: Pats trade #31 (600 points) to Indianapolis for #34 and 136 (598 points).

34. Doug Martin, RB, Boise St. 5'9" 223#.



Beast!
Pats go offense with their first pick and the fans howl! But imagine if it were Trent Richardson at 27. The "muscle hamster" is a bowling-ball type of multiple purpose threat in the Ray Rice mold. Martin commands an intoxicating fusion of core strength, explosiveness, and agility. He can absolutely blast it between the tackles, and he can also be extremely effective outside. Most importantly, he's got the core strength, the core flexibility, the fluidity, and the lateral agility to consistently be a threat, on any given play, to go through you or around you. Martin's 10.95 Agility Score (short shuttle plus 3-cone time) compares favorably with backs such as Ray Rice and Matt Forte. Martin is also a solid receiver and blocker who can be as effective in the passing game as in the running game. And he's an excellent punt and kickoff returner. Put it all together and you have a complete "4 down" player who can be a workhorse and who can compliment the existing RBBC and integrate into the passing attack.

Why should the Pats use a high draft pick on a RB? The Pats need to develop the running game and more balance on offense. Tedy Bruschi among others has suggested this. It would take pressure off Tom Brady and probably extend his career, as well as make the offense less predictable and more effective. While I fully expect Shane Vereen to be a superb offensive weapon for the Pats, there are signs that the Pats are not content with just Vereen, Ridley and Woodhead. They have signed 2 FBs recently, and they have hosted several RBs for visits, including Martin and Virginia Tech RB David Wilson, both projected 1st-2nd round prospects, so they seem to be open to the possibility of spending a high pick on a RB. Josh McDaniels used the #12 pick overall in 2009 on Knowshon Moreno in his first draft as HC of the Broncos, and it seems that McDaniels values RBs as a key component of the offense more than Bill O'Brien did. So it's not out of the question. And Martin would be solid value at #34. I wouldn't be surprised if he ends up being a better pro than Trent Richardson.

Barring an unlikely and expensive trade with Chicago for Matt Forte, Martin represents the best option for the Pats to acquire a RB who can be a workhorse and a difference maker in both the running and passing games. Martin and Shane Vereen should complement each other well - somewhat analogous to having Rob Gronkowski and Aaron Hernandez at TE. Martin, Vereen, Gronkowski, Hernandez, Welker and Lloyd would give Brady an amazing complement of offensive weapons.
* Ye Official 2012 Mock Draft Thread!! * (post #1135)

Obviously, that was written before Ridley proved that he was a stud horse, making using a high draft pick on Martin unnecessary. But I stand by my evaluation of the kid, and by my call for more emphasis on and integration of the running game into the offense.

Incidentally, I had the Colts trading up to take Coby Fleener in the trade. Martin ended up going #31, Fleener #34.

Quote:
Originally Posted by supafly View Post
I don't see Belichick changing his M.O. any time soon though, especially as Ridley has proven to be a great pickup for the lead carry role, and the others have added their stamp on their assignments and responsibilities.

Having a RBBC system offers the best of both worlds due to the fact that it allows us to be able to do just about everything in any given situation as others may be better at certain aspects. It also allows for great depth at the position in the meantime.

I think the thing that some do not realize is that we probably have at least one/two "homerun" threats currently on the team right now. There's no way that I'd want to see a trade done for any elite RB's, there's absolutely no need for it. We've got great monetary value contract-wise, great depth, and the ability to change pace with various roles. They are all also very young and probably haven't reached their ceiling yet, besides maybe Woodhead.

For those who'd want one of the pricey-RB's who have the ability to take it to the house on any given play, I remind you of the Matt Forte talk in the offseason...

The production, depth, and monetary steal that we get at the position is likely one of the best in the entire NFL and is probably only going to get better.
I agree. Edelman and Vereen are both homerun threats, as both showed with long TDs against the Jets (plus Edelman's PR TD the week before). Demps will be as well is he can pick up the offense and develop as a RB/WR hybrid. I'd be thrilled to add guys like Tavon Austin or De'Anthony Thompson (2014), but only if they are available in the right range. There's no need to reach, and no need to overspend.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid

"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi
mayoclinic is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 07:41 AM   #36
All Pro Poster
 
PATSYLICIOUS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,223
Default Re: If Ridley continues to improve and Vereen shows growth.....

What's scary about Martin is he didn't really hit his stride until week 6 or so. That was his first game with above average #'s (120 total yards and a TD). And here he stands tied with Foster as the most productive back in the league ,could go either way with those 2 but they're clearlly the top 2 numbers wise. Imagine how he'll be next year.

As for the whole trading our whole RB stable for one stud argument, is that factoring in salary? Because our 4 guys are playing for dirt cheap, and Ridley/Vereen/Bolden are locked up the next few years at that rate. I don't think I'd trade THAT for one guy who's going to take up $8M+ in cap space. But if we're taking the money out of the equation, I think I'd take AP in a heartbeat.
__________________
Organized madness
The young Gott-stra
Young Frank Sinatra
PATSYLICIOUS is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 07:42 AM   #37
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,455
My Mood: Cheerful
Default Re: If Ridley continues to improve and Vereen shows growth.....

I like the current blend of RBs on the roster:

Ridley - pretty fast, pretty strong. A combination of the other backs.
Bolden - Power.
Vereen - great hands, good speed, home run threat.
Woodhead - great hands, good speed.
Demps - Fastest player in the NFL when he returns next season, home run threat.

BB will know what he wants to do with them all when it comes to handing out contracts and will likely keep the backs he wants.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Big-T is online now  
Old 11-28-2012, 08:10 AM   #38
In the Starting Line-up
 
borg's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,007
Default Re: If Ridley continues to improve and Vereen shows growth.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by manxman2601 View Post
I'd trade them all for Doug Martin.
The Patriots running game has produced 1581 yds/369 atts = 4.3 yds/att = 18 TDs.
The TB Bucs running game has produced 1339 yds/295 atts = 4.5 yds/att = 11 TDs

Pats RBs have caught 464 yds/ 39 catches = 11.9 yds/ catch = 3 TDs
Bucs RBs have caught 408 yds/ 46 catches = 8.9 yds/ catch = 1 TD

No doubt Martin is the most complete back....1050 yds rushing/ 332 yds receiving =1382 total yds. But from a big picture standpoint, the Patriots have options in case of RB injury. The Bucs have all their eggs in one player. Just look at Dallas. Once Demarco Murray went down....Dallas had no running game and no hope.
The Pats RB collection is the most complete group/deep that I can remember....for the cost of a #2, #3, and FAs......Epic Win for the boys in Blue and Silver
Hart Lee Chung likes this.
__________________
"In the end, Belichick juiced Moss like an orange, and once all the good pulp was squeezed, he tossed Moss aside. "


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
borg is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 08:20 AM   #39
Let's go HEAT!
 
KontradictioN's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Floreeda
Posts: 21,283
Blog Entries: 5
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: If Ridley continues to improve and Vereen shows growth.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by borg View Post
The Patriots running game has produced 1581 yds/369 atts = 4.3 yds/att = 18 TDs.
The TB Bucs running game has produced 1339 yds/295 atts = 4.5 yds/att = 11 TDs

Pats RBs have caught 464 yds/ 39 catches = 11.9 yds/ catch = 3 TDs
Bucs RBs have caught 408 yds/ 46 catches = 8.9 yds/ catch = 1 TD

No doubt Martin is the most complete back....1050 yds rushing/ 332 yds receiving =1382 total yds. But from a big picture standpoint, the Patriots have options in case of RB injury. The Bucs have all their eggs in one player. Just look at Dallas. Once Demarco Murray went down....Dallas had no running game and no hope.
The Pats RB collection is the most complete group/deep that I can remember....for the cost of a #2, #3, and FAs......Epic Win for the boys in Blue and Silver
I don't have any doubt, though, that Tampa Bay will build a RBBC with Martin being the most featured back in their group going into next season though.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


CREDIT - Sicilian
KontradictioN is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 08:24 AM   #40
In the Starting Line-up
 
The Gr8est's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,770
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: If Ridley continues to improve and Vereen shows growth.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big-T View Post
I like the current blend of RBs on the roster:

Ridley - pretty fast, pretty strong. A combination of the other backs.
Bolden - Power.
Vereen - great hands, good speed, home run threat.
Woodhead - great hands, good speed. Great knowledge of the offense and Pats' playbook.
Demps - Fastest player in the NFL when he returns next season, home run threat.

BB will know what he wants to do with them all when it comes to handing out contracts and will likely keep the backs he wants.
Just added a bit to Woodhead's description to more accurately guage his value to the Pats.
likes this.
__________________
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will end up plowing for those who kept their swords in the first place! - Anonymous internet poster


"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
The Gr8est is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Shane Vereen/Ridley thread Triumph PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 39 04-30-2011 01:33 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563