Paddy Chung unhappy (possibly fit?) - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree30Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-20-2012, 07:09 PM   #11
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 633
Default Re: Paddy Chung unhappy (possibly fit?)

We used to have high hopes that he'd be a competent (read: league-average) safety. He's not. And the fact that he can't stay on the field only exacerbates the issue. Both Chung and Dowling are not long for this team.

Last edited by Salva135; 11-20-2012 at 07:09 PM..
Salva135 is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 11-20-2012, 07:11 PM   #12
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
MP-Logick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 879
Default Re: Paddy Chung unhappy (possibly fit?)

He doesn't seem to fit with this defense. I'd like to see us draft a safety who can play in man coverage and use the savings from not re-signing him to keep Vollmer around for a long time.
MP-Logick is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 07:25 PM   #13
Rookie
 
FosterTheSkins's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 48
Default Re: Paddy Chung unhappy (possibly fit?)

Man reading stories like this makes me think twice about getting my Paddy Chung jersey.
__________________
All the other D's with the pumped up schemes
You better run, better run, outrun my QB
All the other D's with the pumped up schemes
You better run, better run, faster than RG3.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
FosterTheSkins is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 07:28 PM   #14
PatsFans.com Veteran
 
AndyJohnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18,625
Default Re: Paddy Chung unhappy (possibly fit?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by robertweathers View Post
Hmmm. Doesn't look good for Chung and his future as a Patriot.

People dismiss tweets as innocuous but they can sometime be very telling to a player's state of mind.

Chung is clearly frustrated but it goes without saying that between injuries in inconsistency hes been a non-factor this year.
Ironic structure of thought process here.
AndyJohnson is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 07:32 PM   #15
PatsFans.com Veteran
 
AndyJohnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18,625
Default Re: Paddy Chung unhappy (possibly fit?)

You would think after 12 year of Belichick 'it's rarely what it seems' football, I find it shocking that people take zero information plus a cryptic and deleted tweet to draw the conclusion that Chung has been benched, was a healthy scratch, is angry and BB has now decided after playing him more when healthy than any other safety on the roster the last 2 years that he sucks.
I gotta get into the Twitter thing, can someone teach me how to interpret the 12 word tweets into a treatise?
DarrylS, JJDChE, patfanken and 2 others like this.
AndyJohnson is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 07:40 PM   #16
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
supafly's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 8,123
Default Re: Paddy Chung unhappy (possibly fit?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson View Post
You would think after 12 year of Belichick 'it's rarely what it seems' football, I find it shocking that people take zero information plus a cryptic and deleted tweet to draw the conclusion that Chung has been benched, was a healthy scratch, is angry and BB has now decided after playing him more when healthy than any other safety on the roster the last 2 years that he sucks.
I gotta get into the Twitter thing, can someone teach me how to interpret the 12 word tweets into a treatise?
The fact that he quickly deleted it only makes it more suspicious.

Some of these twitter messages do not mean as much as people think, while others are more obvious.

Having Chung in Thursday night would make a lot of sense, but having him play vs high passing offenses probably wouldn't---just my take on it. We may see his snap count change with the gameplan, as he may be more of a rotational player now, as opposed to the full-time starter that we've grown accustomed to, and that's probably for the best.
__________________
Patiently waiting to defend the next "bubble" player in this summer's training camp.....
supafly is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 07:45 PM   #17
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Gwedd's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bath, Maine
Posts: 4,384
My Mood: Busy
Default Re: Paddy Chung unhappy (possibly fit?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by FosterTheSkins View Post
Man reading stories like this makes me think twice about getting my Paddy Chung jersey.

Was that the green throwback with Paddy Patriot on the helmet?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Gwedd is online now  
Old 11-20-2012, 07:47 PM   #18
All Pro Poster
 
PATRIOTSFANINPA's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 15,267
My Mood: Bitchy
Default Re: Paddy Chung unhappy (possibly fit?)

I would go after Deshon Goldson,Will Moore or Jairus Byrd to fill Chung's role next year.
PATRIOTSFANINPA is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 07:52 PM   #19
PatsFans.com Veteran
 
AndyJohnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18,625
Default Re: Paddy Chung unhappy (possibly fit?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by supafly View Post
The fact that he quickly deleted it only makes it more suspicious.
Why? You are just guessing at that with no basis.

Quote:
Some of these twitter messages do not mean as much as people think, while others are more obvious.
Are you saying you can tell the difference?

Quote:
Having Chung in Thursday night would make a lot of sense, but having him play vs high passing offenses probably wouldn't---just my take on it. We may see his snap count change with the gameplan, as he may be more of a rotational player now, as opposed to the full-time starter that we've grown accustomed to, and that's probably for the best.
What are you basing this on? None of this was true when he was last healthy, so what leads you to believe his role has changed while he was injured?
When he is healthy then the questions will be answered. Creating a conspiracy theory over a deleted tweet is the kind of stuff that belongs in the National Enquirer.
Dragda likes this.
AndyJohnson is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 08:12 PM   #20
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
supafly's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 8,123
Default Re: Paddy Chung unhappy (possibly fit?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson View Post
Why? You are just guessing at that with no basis.


Are you saying you can tell the difference?



What are you basing this on? None of this was true when he was last healthy, so what leads you to believe his role has changed while he was injured?
When he is healthy then the questions will be answered. Creating a conspiracy theory over a deleted tweet is the kind of stuff that belongs in the National Enquirer.
Sometimes the writing on the wall can lead to actual truth, Andy.

As you say, sometimes it is just pure speculation.

The secondary has improved in Chung's absence. He is much better as an "in the box" safety, and he has proven that he pretty much sucks in coverage. That is not a thought that is news to anyone, as the high majority of media members and posters here all feel the same way. Chung is a liability in coverage.

If he didn't have anything to necessarily hide as you are inferring (you are also making an assumption too, just like me) then why would he quickly remove it? Why would anyone do that? Why wouldn't you just leave it alone?

While I agree with you that there is speculation involved, the fact remains that he added some curiosity to the equation by quickly going out of his way to remove it.

Sometimes 1 + 1 really does equal 2. Sometimes the smoke proves to lead to the fire.

As you have pointed out, sometimes not. Only time will tell if Chung immediately jumps back to a full-time role or he sees his reps lessened a bit due to specific gameplanning, as that is what I am inferring.

One way or another, I would expect to see him Thursday night vs the Jets, but we'll have to see.
__________________
Patiently waiting to defend the next "bubble" player in this summer's training camp.....

Last edited by supafly; 11-20-2012 at 08:20 PM..
supafly is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Possibly going after RFA? R_T26 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 6 02-28-2009 07:02 PM
It can't possibly say this Pujo PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 11 08-01-2007 05:11 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC