Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson
Why? You are just guessing at that with no basis.
Are you saying you can tell the difference?
What are you basing this on? None of this was true when he was last healthy, so what leads you to believe his role has changed while he was injured?
When he is healthy then the questions will be answered. Creating a conspiracy theory over a deleted tweet is the kind of stuff that belongs in the National Enquirer.
|
Sometimes the writing on the wall can lead to actual truth, Andy.
As you say, sometimes it is just pure speculation.
The secondary has improved in Chung's absence. He is much better as an "in the box" safety, and he has proven that he pretty much sucks in coverage. That is not a thought that is news to anyone, as the high majority of media members and posters here all feel the same way. Chung is a liability in coverage.
If he didn't have anything to necessarily hide as you are inferring (you are also making an assumption too, just like me) then why would he quickly remove it? Why would anyone do that? Why wouldn't you just leave it alone?
While I agree with you that there is speculation involved, the fact remains that he added some curiosity to the equation by quickly going out of his way to remove it.
Sometimes 1 + 1 really does equal 2. Sometimes the smoke proves to lead to the fire.
As you have pointed out, sometimes not. Only time will tell if Chung immediately jumps back to a full-time role or he sees his reps lessened a bit due to specific gameplanning, as that is what I am inferring.
One way or another, I would expect to see him Thursday night vs the Jets, but we'll have to see.