Situational Head Scratchers: Poor Clock Management - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree11Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-18-2012, 11:14 PM   #1
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
nabwong's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Peeladelphia
Posts: 1,665
My Mood: Sleepy
Default Situational Head Scratchers: Poor Clock Management

So we had the ball just before half time. I think it was 2nd & 7. The clock was running down 2:30-ish. I remembered we could have run it down to the 2 minute warning. The colts had 3 timeouts left. Instead, we ran a play and it was incomplete, stopping the clock before the 2 min warning. So fast forward, the colts get the ball back with 1:55+ and 3 time outs.

My question is this:

Why not run the clock down to 2 min warning and we have 2nd and 3rd downs to potentially run the clock down to 1 min or slightly less? Or if the colts wanted more time, they would have been forced to burn some timeouts. I know the colts didn't score but we could have reduced the possibility even further. This comes after last week's quick snap against buffalo.

Am I off base?
__________________
Belichick: Stats are for losers. Final scores are for winners.

Last edited by nabwong; 11-18-2012 at 11:15 PM..
nabwong is online now  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 11-18-2012, 11:22 PM   #2
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 68
Default re: Situational Head Scratchers: Poor Clock Management

I was thinking the same thing but since they weren't showing the playclock, I figured it was going to run out before the 2 minute warning.
SacPete1 is offline  
Old 11-18-2012, 11:23 PM   #3
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,261
Default re: Situational Head Scratchers: Poor Clock Management

The patriots simply have more confidence getting first downs through the air than they do running it.
coolguy is offline  
Old 11-18-2012, 11:29 PM   #4
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
nabwong's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Peeladelphia
Posts: 1,665
My Mood: Sleepy
Default re: Situational Head Scratchers: Poor Clock Management

Quote:
Originally Posted by coolguy View Post
The patriots simply have more confidence getting first downs through the air than they do running it.
It's not about getting the first down. It's about why we did not let the clock go to the 2 min warning. Unless I am wrong about the play clock.
__________________
Belichick: Stats are for losers. Final scores are for winners.
nabwong is online now  
Old 11-18-2012, 11:32 PM   #5
In the Starting Line-up
 
The Gr8est's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,770
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default re: Situational Head Scratchers: Poor Clock Management

Quote:
Originally Posted by nabwong View Post
So we had the ball just before half time. I think it was 2nd & 7. The clock was running down 2:30-ish. I remembered we could have run it down to the 2 minute warning. The colts had 3 timeouts left. Instead, we ran a play and it was incomplete, stopping the clock before the 2 min warning. So fast forward, the colts get the ball back with 1:55+ and 3 time outs.

My question is this:

Why not run the clock down to 2 min warning and we have 2nd and 3rd downs to potentially run the clock down to 1 min or slightly less? Or if the colts wanted more time, they would have been forced to burn some timeouts. I know the colts didn't score but we could have reduced the possibility even further. This comes after last week's quick snap against buffalo.

Am I off base?

Well considering the defensive and special teams scores, the offense had spent a lot of time on the sidelines and needed the work and BB was trying to preserve clock.

Yeah, that's the ticket.

__________________
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will end up plowing for those who kept their swords in the first place! - Anonymous internet poster


"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
The Gr8est is offline  
Old 11-18-2012, 11:33 PM   #6
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Joker's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 12,465
My Mood: Amused
Default re: Situational Head Scratchers: Poor Clock Management

I was in the stands and not looking at the clock...but I knew it was winding down...during halftime shooting the shiz with other fans is when I found out...immediately thought of the exact same ploy last week...I guess McD just doesn't care enough
Joker is offline  
Old 11-18-2012, 11:39 PM   #7
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,089
My Mood: Cynical
Default re: Situational Head Scratchers: Poor Clock Management

Quote:
Originally Posted by nabwong View Post
It's not about getting the first down. It's about why we did not let the clock go to the 2 min warning. Unless I am wrong about the play clock.
I was thinking same thing but swear I saw the play clock and there was too much of a discrepancy to run it down.
tombonneau is offline  
Old 11-19-2012, 12:27 AM   #8
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,617
My Mood: Amused
Default re: Situational Head Scratchers: Poor Clock Management

Quote:
Originally Posted by nabwong View Post
It's not about getting the first down. It's about why we did not let the clock go to the 2 min warning. Unless I am wrong about the play clock.
I went and looked at the play-by-play and they should have had enough time since the play clock should have been reset to 40 seconds (not 25) since the 1st down play occurred at (2:41) remaining and took more than 1 second off the clock.. So, yes, they should have let the clock continue to run since it looked like the Colts weren't going to use their timeouts on that side of the 2 minute warning.

I'll be honest. I think that sometimes Brady just gets caught up in the moment and forgets about the clock management. Either that, or it's McDaniels. Either way, it's not a good thing.
captain stone and SteveKiner like this.
DaBruinz is offline  
Old 11-19-2012, 12:49 AM   #9
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,453
Default re: Situational Head Scratchers: Poor Clock Management

This hurts to say but our defense has been more situationally aware this year than the offense has at times. Especially in the two minute areas. We used to be known as that team whose offense was going to kill you in the two minute area but that hasn't been as apparent this year.
captain stone likes this.
VrabelJr is online now  
Old 11-19-2012, 02:32 AM   #10
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
Gumby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,485
Default re: Situational Head Scratchers: Poor Clock Management

McD is setting everybody up.

The entire season long he is going to run this HAND0FF to RIDLEY quick snap on the goal line until everyone sees it coming a mile away. Then in the playoffs he is going to do the play action and TB will throw it to Gronk.
.....


oh wait, ([please dont beat me up for blackhumor, sometimes if you dont laugh you will cry] god, I hope he heals up quick at least for first playoff game)


or else McC will just keep on having TB hand off to ridley over and over again using these single back formation, quick snap no huddle plays.
Gumby is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poor Clock Management by Brady and BB? PATRIOT64 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 6 11-07-2006 06:29 PM
OT: Two Eagles head-scratchers??? T-ShirtDynasty PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 5 10-10-2005 02:35 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC