The OFFICIAL Patriots vs Bills PostGame Thread - Page 23 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree83Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-12-2012, 02:31 PM   #221
In the Starting Line-up
 
condon84's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,682
Default Re: The OFFICIAL Patriots vs Bills PostGame Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae View Post
No. It's safe to assume that BB thinks that area needs his personal attention. Now, it's possible that he thinks better coaching is needed, but even that doesn't mean that he thinks the current coaching is bad. It's BB's defense and he thinks he teaches it as well as pretty much anyone can, after all.
I don't know if you've realized, but the defense is getting worse. It's possible that the entire secondary personnel is just all playing horribly at the same time, but it's more probable that opposing offenses are seeing tendencies by our secondary and are exploiting it.

Isn't it fair to say that opposing offensive coaches are doing a better job of putting their players in position to succeed vs our defensive coaches and their inability to put our defensive players to do the same? If you look at the Bills offensive personnel vs our defensive personnel, I don't see the vast difference in talent that equals the Bills scoring 31 points and gaining 480 yards.
condon84 is online now  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 11-12-2012, 02:38 PM   #222
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
 
Deus Irae's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35,447
Default Re: The OFFICIAL Patriots vs Bills PostGame Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by condon84 View Post
I don't know if you've realized, but the defense is getting worse.
I've been pointing this out since 2008/2009, so I'm not sure why you'd wonder if I realized it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by condon84 View Post
It's possible that the entire secondary personnel is just all playing horribly at the same time, but it's more probable that opposing offenses are seeing tendencies by our secondary and are exploiting it.
Actually, the players sucking make it very easy for opposing offenses to find weaknesses, and tendencies become less important.

Quote:
Originally Posted by condon84 View Post
Isn't it fair to say that opposing offensive coaches are doing a better job of putting their players in position to succeed vs our defensive coaches and their inability to put our defensive players to do the same?
No. History, even as recent as last year, has demonstrated this claim to be wrong time and again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by condon84 View Post
If you look at the Bills offensive personnel vs our defensive personnel, I don't see the vast difference in talent that equals the Bills scoring 31 points and gaining 480 yards.
Remembering that McCourty was playing safety, not corner:

Name the CB who has the ability/experience combination to be anything approaching a fair match for Steve Johnson.

Name the LB/S who has the ability/experience combination to be anything approaching a fair match for Spiller.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
Deus Irae is offline  
Old 11-12-2012, 02:51 PM   #223
Practice Squad
 
Boomer B's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 234
Default Re: The OFFICIAL Patriots vs Bills PostGame Thread

As much as a lot of people think our LBs are amongst the best in the league the reality is that they are amongst the worst in pass coverage. When Chung comes back they should put him in at LB on passing downs and let him cover the TEs or RBs.

Passing down lineup:

Line: Ninkovich, Cunningham, Wilfork, Jones
LB: Mayo, Chung
DBs: Talib, Dennerd, Arrington, Gregory, McCourty,

press coverage on the outside and let's mix in some blitzes from Mayo/Chung/McCourty
__________________
Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser.
Vince Lombardi
Boomer B is offline  
Old 11-12-2012, 07:10 PM   #224
In the Starting Line-up
 
condon84's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,682
Default Re: The OFFICIAL Patriots vs Bills PostGame Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae View Post
I've been pointing this out since 2008/2009, so I'm not sure why you'd wonder if I realized it.
That's very astute of you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae View Post
Actually, the players sucking make it very easy for opposing offenses to find weaknesses, and tendencies become less important.
The players sucking in addition to a very easy scheme to dissect makes even ****ty QBs like Fitz look good.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae View Post
No. History, even as recent as last year, has demonstrated this claim to be wrong time and again.
Just because you say so doesn't mean it is. There have been games where our defensive coaches have been outcoached believe it or not.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae View Post
Remembering that McCourty was playing safety, not corner:

Name the CB who has the ability/experience combination to be anything approaching a fair match for Steve Johnson.

Name the LB/S who has the ability/experience combination to be anything approaching a fair match for Spiller.
We don't play man coverage exclusively so it doesn't matter if we have a guy who can exclusively cover Spiller or Johnson. And from what I saw, when we did play man coverage and brought pressure, we seemed to fair a lot better than when we played zone. From what I see, our zone coverage is more susceptible to easier completions.

As an aside, I don't know any LB who can cover Spiller exclusively. And Johnson is a handful even for the best CBs out there.
condon84 is online now  
Old 11-12-2012, 08:03 PM   #225
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
 
Deus Irae's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35,447
Default Re: The OFFICIAL Patriots vs Bills PostGame Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by condon84 View Post
That's very astute of you.
Eh... it's not as if I was the only one who saw it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by condon84 View Post
The players sucking in addition to a very easy scheme to dissect makes even ****ty QBs like Fitz look good.
When players can't handle complex plays because of inexperience or lack of talent, that's what happens. This is nothing new.

Quote:
Originally Posted by condon84 View Post
Just because you say so doesn't mean it is. There have been games where our defensive coaches have been outcoached believe it or not.
It's not true because I say it is. It's true because it's true, and being outcoached in an individual game now and again is irrelevant to the discussion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by condon84 View Post
We don't play man coverage exclusively so it doesn't matter if we have a guy who can exclusively cover Spiller or Johnson. And from what I saw, when we did play man coverage and brought pressure, we seemed to fair a lot better than when we played zone. From what I see, our zone coverage is more susceptible to easier completions.
Yes, they suck in man and zone right now. Is that really a suprise given what's been happening in that secondary in terms of who's been playing and why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by condon84 View Post
As an aside, I don't know any LB who can cover Spiller exclusively. And Johnson is a handful even for the best CBs out there.
Tell that to the person who was denigrating the Bills offensive talent.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
Deus Irae is offline  
Old 11-12-2012, 10:54 PM   #226
In the Starting Line-up
 
condon84's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,682
Default Re: The OFFICIAL Patriots vs Bills PostGame Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae View Post
Eh... it's not as if I was the only one who saw it.
I guess I wasn't being sarcastic enough.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae View Post
When players can't handle complex plays because of inexperience or lack of talent, that's what happens. This is nothing new.
When players are not coached and put in the best position to make plays, then they look inexperienced or don't have talent. Back when we had a more competent coaching staff, some guy named Earthwind played defense for us and looked competent.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae View Post
It's not true because I say it is. It's true because it's true, and being outcoached in an individual game now and again is irrelevant to the discussion.
I didn't realize "individual game" is another term for 3 years.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae View Post
Yes, they suck in man and zone right now. Is that really a suprise given what's been happening in that secondary in terms of who's been playing and why?
McCourty looked great his first year. Then regressed. Arrington looked pretty decent last year, now he looks like trash. Chung looked halfway decent in 2010, now he looks like poop. Why are these players regressing? Are they losing talent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae View Post
Tell that to the person who was denigrating the Bills offensive talent.
So two players and a bottom tier QB equals 31 points and 480 yards of offense? That's the difference between our defense and their offense?
condon84 is online now  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official Patriots-Chiefs Postgame Thread shmessy PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 40 11-22-2011 12:50 PM
The Official Patriots/Bills Postgame Thread Ian PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 226 09-27-2010 02:22 PM
****** Official Unofficial Patriots/Rams Postgame Observations Thread ****** Deus Irae PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 179 08-27-2010 08:35 PM
Official Patriots/Ravens Postgame thread Ian PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 110 01-11-2010 08:04 PM
Official Patriots/Titans PostGame Thread Ian PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 67 10-19-2009 03:17 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563