ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Mr Coffee's a little cranky this morning. Still mourning the demise (likely permanent) of his beloved Yankees.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
I didn't intentionally leave anything out you little conspiracy theorist
Then you might want to check the source that you got that series from because every breakdown gives you the time remaining, the quarter that it's in, the field position, and the score.
Quote:
yes, it started at 5:44.....and your point is?
That there was plenty of time remaining for the Jets to win the game and that McDaniels was calling plays to try to, you know, score and put the game out of reach? But something tells me that you know my point and simply don't have a counter argument for it.
Quote:
define 'breaking off nice runs'......because the pats ran the ball well enough against the jets....
At that point in the game, it was very sporadic due to the blocking. And, once again, the team was trying to score. They had more success doing that through the air, 2 TD's with 0 INT's, on Sunday than they did on the ground with 0 TD's.
Quote:
and I am sure you knew what mcdaniels intent was....because he told you.
The pure irony here in this pitiful attempt at a swipe is hilarious.
Quote:
here's some more kool-aid
Now I know you're desperate and are otherwise absolutely sure that you're point is as weak as a 96 year old woman. If you have to resort to calling me, of all people, a Kool-Aid drinker, then maybe it's time to step back and reassess the situation. Because, as of right now, you're completely outmatched. But this is nothing new...
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I dont know if any of you guys agree , but for the first time watching our games whenever the camera zoomed on Tommy on the sidelines v the Jets he didnt look good ! What i mean is he had that worried look even when JM was talking to him. Could he have been ill, becoz he sure looked it. Sometimes we catch him smiling, speaking to players, but this game he was not the same. I hope not so he can travel well to London and light it up for all our UK fans.
Here ya go, buddy. This made me feel better about Tom's outlook!
not desperate at all....I do realize that your basis of knowledge has nothing on mine.....you like to insert meaningless insight on behalf of others.....you should check that before spewing it as gospel
I have the week before and the exact same bad playcalling down the stretch that only helped to better the chances for the other team. there certainly was a precedence for that drive.
'the blocking was very sporadic' ..... is that a proffessional opinion or just a passing quip because you could not come up with anything more definitive?
Quote:
Originally Posted by KontradictioN
Then you might want to check the source that you got that series from because every breakdown gives you the time remaining, the quarter that it's in, the field position, and the score.
That there was plenty of time remaining for the Jets to win the game and that McDaniels was calling plays to try to, you know, score and put the game out of reach? But something tells me that you know my point and simply don't have a counter argument for it.
At that point in the game, it was very sporadic due to the blocking. And, once again, the team was trying to score. They had more success doing that through the air, 2 TD's with 0 INT's, on Sunday than they did on the ground with 0 TD's.
The pure irony here in this pitiful attempt at a swipe is hilarious.
Now I know you're desperate and are otherwise absolutely sure that you're point is as weak as a 96 year old woman. If you have to resort to calling me, of all people, a Kool-Aid drinker, then maybe it's time to step back and reassess the situation. Because, as of right now, you're completely outmatched. But this is nothing new...
__________________ “ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.
I am a proud patriot fan but i also have one last thing i wish to add about the attitude of pats fans . Pats fans are mostly guys who talk aboit human beings as "assets" and "liabilities" . This guys will never achieve true success in their lives because they wanted the "safe" route in careers but theyw ill gladly criticize tom Brady who has worked like a dog sweating day and night to get to where he is . These so called "fans" sit in there perfect square houses with huge flat screen Tv's and tie make snobby comments about men who are working their butts off all day . These are what you call the "Intellectuals" of society . How can these people ever appreciate anyone ? Every other team is dying to take tom brady but unfortunately he has to play for the one team who's fans talk of him like some sort of "experiment thing" for their ego .
lol, no. You are not a Patriots fan. If you're not capable of appreciating the fact that we have an all-time great head coach, then you're either a troll or an idiot. Your pick.
I am a proud patriot fan but i also have one last thing i wish to add about the attitude of pats fans . Pats fans are mostly guys who talk aboit human beings as "assets" and "liabilities" . This guys will never achieve true success in their lives because they wanted the "safe" route in careers but theyw ill gladly criticize tom Brady who has worked like a dog sweating day and night to get to where he is . These so called "fans" sit in there perfect square houses with huge flat screen Tv's and tie make snobby comments about men who are working their butts off all day . These are what you call the "Intellectuals" of society . How can these people ever appreciate anyone ? Every other team is dying to take tom brady but unfortunately he has to play for the one team who's fans talk of him like some sort of "experiment thing" for their ego .
wow.....hittin the sauce early
__________________ “ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.
not desperate at all....I do realize that your basis of knowledge has nothing on mine.....you like to insert meaningless insight on behalf of others.....you should check that before spewing it as gospel
I challenge you to explain what I've been wrong about thus far that I have been "spewing as gospel". You brought up a horrible example of bad play calling and used it to try to slander McDaniels. The fact of the matter is that you could have brought up the second ill advised screen and have been correct about it.
Quote:
I have the week before and the exact same bad playcalling down the stretch that only helped to better the chances for the other team. there certainly was a precedence for that drive.
There were two offensive series in the same stretch during the Seattle game. The score at the start of the first series was 23-17. Again, the Patriots were trying to score. In the first drive, the Patriots went mostly through the air. That resulted in 3 first downs, 3:14 off the clock, and a punt at the Patriots 46 yard line, pinning Seattle deep. The drive stalled due to penalty.
Then, after a Seattle punt, there was a drive similar to the one you're lambasting McDaniels for not doing in this thread. That drive saw two handoffs to Ridley for two whole yards followed by an incomplete pass by Brady that was intended for Branch. In all, it took less than a minute off the clock and the punt ultimately ended up giving Seattle field position at their own 43 where they proceeded to put the final score on the board.
Quote:
'the blocking was very sporadic' ..... is that a proffessional opinion or just a passing quip because you could not come up with anything more definitive?
Sure I could. I noted as much in my last post where I stated, correctly, that the Patriots had 0 rushing TD's on the ground and did the majority of their work through the air. I should go ahead and add that they popped off just north of 4 YPC and that the inconsistent blocking has not only been noted here, but in other media outlets... most recently when Pat Kirwin broke down the game yesterday.
Care to keep trying?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
there would have to be a need to try..... since you don't make sense, there is no reason to do so
we just disagree......but you keep trying to insist that your method of thinking has more merit to it.....it does not.....you're pulling crap out of your arse like everyone else.....I don't agree with your guesses
Quote:
Originally Posted by KontradictioN
I challenge you to explain what I've been wrong about thus far that I have been "spewing as gospel". You brought up a horrible example of bad play calling and used it to try to slander McDaniels. The fact of the matter is that you could have brought up the second ill advised screen and have been correct about it.
There were two offensive series in the same stretch during the Seattle game. The score at the start of the first series was 23-17. Again, the Patriots were trying to score. In the first drive, the Patriots went mostly through the air. That resulted in 3 first downs, 3:14 off the clock, and a punt at the Patriots 46 yard line, pinning Seattle deep. The drive stalled due to penalty.
Then, after a Seattle punt, there was a drive similar to the one you're lambasting McDaniels for not doing in this thread. That drive saw two handoffs to Ridley for two whole yards followed by an incomplete pass by Brady that was intended for Branch. In all, it took less than a minute off the clock and the punt ultimately ended up giving Seattle field position at their own 43 where they proceeded to put the final score on the board.
Sure I could. I noted as much in my last post where I stated, correctly, that the Patriots had 0 rushing TD's on the ground and did the majority of their work through the air. I should go ahead and add that they popped off just north of 4 YPC and that the inconsistent blocking has not only been noted here, but in other media outlets... most recently when Pat Kirwin broke down the game yesterday.
Care to keep trying?
__________________ “ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.
10Likes
Re: Was TB ill ?
Linear Mode
