ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
It is clear that the market has cleared at very high levels, likely because of the great amounts of cap room available and the fact that this must be spent by next year (at least on a cash basis).
IMHO, Belichick has yet to grossly overpay for anyone, although Slater got a very nice contract. As always, we have "lost" lots of players to other teams. Perhaps we could have gotten some of these player if we were to win the bidding war. IMHO, few have been signed that we had a chance to sign at a reasonable amount. Sometimes, we bid and lost (e,g, Reggie Wayne). After all, we cannot win all close contests for players, if this were even close, especially re-signs.
CONCLUSION #1
We may need to "overpay" some for players we want. We did so for Slater. Perhaps, we will for Lloyd and/or Landry.
CONCLUSION #2
It is NOT clear that Belichick will grossly overpay anyone.
THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM
What will we do with Welker? Will we pay him the 2012 market value for his services? Will we even come close?
Apparently, Welker refused a 2-year $16M deal as being much too low for this market. He was right.
IMHO, we should do what is necessary to sign Welker to a 2 or 3 year deal at amount we normally would not pay. If we sign a 3 year deal, we should be able to make the contract cap-friendly for 2012. A restructure in 2013 will push even more money to 2014 when more cap money will be available.
BTW, I don't think we trat Welker right if we simply ASSUME that he will sign the franchise tag, participate in of-season activities and play out the season on the tag. If this were really, true, we shouldn't even bother overpaying. We should simply franchise him again next year.
Last edited by mgteich; 03-17-2012 at 07:10 AM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
I don't like the low balling of Welker. He needs to be on this team with TB for the next 3-4 years. 2 years 16 million is a joke. I'd easily go 4 years 24 million garaunteed.
__________________ "Tonight a dynasty is born" - Ricky Proehl before the start of Super Bowl XXXVI
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM
What will we do with Welker? Will we pay him the 2012 market value for his services? Will we even come close?
Apparently, Welker refused a 2-year $16M deal as being much too low for this market. He was right.
IMHO, we should do what is necessary to sign Welker to a 2 or 3 year deal at amount we normally would not pay. If we sign a 3 year deal, we should be able to make the contract cap-friendly for 2012. A restructure in 2013 will push even more money to 2014 when more cap money will be available.
BTW, I don't think we trat Welker right if we simply ASSUME that he will sign the franchise tag, participate in of-season activities and play out the season on the tag. If this were really, true, we shouldn't even bother overpaying. We should simply franchise him again next year.
If the Pats were to offer Welker a two-year contract, fully guaranteed, at exactly franchise tag numbers, he should take it. Why?
Because he would get his second year guarantee a year early.
Because the Pats don't have anybody else coming due they'll want to use it on next year (with apologies to Chung and Vollmer), so they can use it on him.
But he wouldn't be excited about the deal, because he's indeed one of the top receivers in the league, not overpaid if he receives franchise tag money.
So that's a reasonable starting point for negotiations (and it's a lot more than 2 years, $16 million). Call it $23-25 million.
Can the Pats get him to sign a 3-4 year deal, with a guarantee no bigger than that? Perhaps. But if so, the total compensation would need to be pretty generous.
__________________
"To lose one parent may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness." -- Oscar Wilde
It is clear that the market has cleared at very high levels, likely because of the great amounts of cap room available and the fact that this must be spent by next year (at least on a cash basis).
IMHO, Belichick has yet to grossly overpay for anyone, although Slater got a very nice contract. As always, we have "lost" lots of players to other teams. Perhaps we could have gotten some of these player if we were to win the bidding war. IMHO, few have been signed that we had a chance to sign at a reasonable amount. Sometimes, we bid and lost (e,g, Reggie Wayne). After all, we cannot win all close contests for players, if this were even close, especially re-signs.
CONCLUSION #1
We may need to "overpay" some for players we want. We did so for Slater. Perhaps, we will for Lloyd and/or Landry.
CONCLUSION #2
It is NOT clear that Belichick will grossly overpay anyone.
THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM
What will we do with Welker? Will we pay him the 2012 market value for his services? Will we even come close?
Apparently, Welker refused a 2-year $16M deal as being much too low for this market. He was right.
IMHO, we should do what is necessary to sign Welker to a 2 or 3 year deal at amount we normally would not pay. If we sign a 3 year deal, we should be able to make the contract cap-friendly for 2012. A restructure in 2013 will push even more money to 2014 when more cap money will be available.
BTW, I don't think we trat Welker right if we simply ASSUME that he will sign the franchise tag, participate in of-season activities and play out the season on the tag. If this were really, true, we shouldn't even bother overpaying. We should simply franchise him again next year.
I have to disagree on your base of assumption.
1) The owners agreed to these cap numbers and profit sharing... X dollars they make has to be spend on players who make the money.This is agreed as a fair deal by both parties Yet you claim its not FAIR and CBA has to be redone the owners can keep more money and players make less.
2) In any market the value is set by what one is willing to pay ,but you want to Owners to come up with a illegal pricing fixing approach to FA market or let a 3rd body fix the dollar value.... illegal as hell in any capital economy.
3) You want the owners to break there own CBA floor and screw the players of there share of the money.
4) In a true FA with Wes , you let him walk and see if you can out bid your competition but ofcourse you think that is not FAIR .
Best plan trade all picks to 6th and 7th rounders and draft a tonne of cheap players,
trade all the good players too. then they can spend as little as possible,
__________________
NFL - A perfect american business model .
HarleyDavidson-Turning gas into noise for more than 100 yrs without the side effects of power and still making a tonne of money a great american business model.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.