Borges: Condon puts Pats on call - Page 10 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree63Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-16-2012, 02:17 PM   #91
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,727
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Borges: Condon puts Pats on call

Quote:
Originally Posted by stcjones View Post
Colston coming here is a pipe dream....
.....No way Saints let this Guy get away...

The Saints may well have to franchise Brees. I don't really know their cap situation and would guess they will do all they can to keep Colston but sometimes that's out of a team's control, especially when they have to franchise their best player.
Ivan is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-16-2012, 02:22 PM   #92
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
 
Deus Irae's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35,447
Default Re: Borges: Condon puts Pats on call

Quote:
Originally Posted by stcjones View Post
Colston coming here is a pipe dream....
.....No way Saints let this Guy get away...
Brees/Nicks/Colston

3 top guys, 1 franchise tag
ctpatsfan77 likes this.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
Deus Irae is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 02:27 PM   #93
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,895
Default Re: Borges: Condon puts Pats on call

Quote:
Originally Posted by stcjones View Post
Respectfully disagree. We are NOT ok at the WR position going into next season. We have (I think!) Wes Welker PERIOD. Branch is basically done.....ocho is a BUST ...and that is it. Obviously we are great at TE.

We NEED help big time at WR......One of primary reasons why the gints win the SB
: Their WR are big game playmakers that made the plays when they needed to..
Ours were terrible this year with exception of welk (yeah obviously he blew the one catch that was a killer there....But he is awesome. We need to drop ochostinko and branch and bring in some big time talent for Brady to work with....
Our wide receivers were not on the field going head to head against their wide receivers, so in my opinion the comparison doesn't really mean all that much - without mentioning you're focusing strictly on only one game.

Based on your assessment, the better conclusion would be that what the Patriots need to do is upgrade their pass rush and upgrade their pass coverage.

When you look at it as 'pass catchers' rather than just wide receivers so that you're comparing apples to apples (i.e., a 3WR/1TE offense to a 2WR/2TE offense), the picture being painted is not nearly as bleak as it is being portrayed to be.

The way the WR situation is portrayed on this forum one would never guess that this team finished 4th in points scored, or passed for over 5000 yards.
robbomango likes this.
Ron Sellers is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 02:34 PM   #94
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 770
Default Re: Borges: Condon puts Pats on call

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Sellers View Post
Our wide receivers were not on the field going head to head against their wide receivers, so in my opinion the comparison doesn't really mean all that much - without mentioning you're focusing strictly on only one game.

Based on your assessment, the better conclusion would be that what the Patriots need to do is upgrade their pass rush and upgrade their pass coverage.

When you look at it as 'pass catchers' rather than just wide receivers so that you're comparing apples to apples (i.e., a 3WR/1TE offense to a 2WR/2TE offense), the picture being painted is not nearly as bleak as it is being portrayed to be.

The way the WR situation is portrayed on this forum one would never guess that this team finished 4th in points scored, or passed for over 5000 yards.
Except that our offense has been far from elite in the playoffs in a long tome and that's where its mattered..we went far using the dink and dunk offense without a traditional Wr. But in theend against good defenses when teams can get physical and take out those short field guys we have no one to draw the safeties to the sidelines or deep.....if bb didn't think it was an issue he wouldn't have thrown 6million$ at ocho
RIpats88 is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 02:42 PM   #95
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
 
Deus Irae's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35,447
Default Re: Borges: Condon puts Pats on call

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Sellers View Post
Our wide receivers were not on the field going head to head against their wide receivers, so in my opinion the comparison doesn't really mean all that much - without mentioning you're focusing strictly on only one game.

Based on your assessment, the better conclusion would be that what the Patriots need to do is upgrade their pass rush and upgrade their pass coverage.

When you look at it as 'pass catchers' rather than just wide receivers so that you're comparing apples to apples (i.e., a 3WR/1TE offense to a 2WR/2TE offense), the picture being painted is not nearly as bleak as it is being portrayed to be.

The way the WR situation is portrayed on this forum one would never guess that this team finished 4th in points scored, or passed for over 5000 yards.
You're being unfair in trying to lump the tight ends into a discussion about the wide receivers as if they are all of a kind.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
Deus Irae is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 02:51 PM   #96
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,895
Default Re: Borges: Condon puts Pats on call

Quote:
Originally Posted by RIpats88 View Post
Except that our offense has been far from elite in the playoffs in a long tome and that's where its mattered..we went far using the dink and dunk offense without a traditional Wr. But in theend against good defenses when teams can get physical and take out those short field guys we have no one to draw the safeties to the sidelines or deep.....if bb didn't think it was an issue he wouldn't have thrown 6million$ at ocho
When you get into the playoffs you are playing the best of the best; it's not reasonable to assume your team will continue to play at the same level and win as easily as they did against lesser teams. If you play an elite team that is primarily strong on defense, the normal expectation would be that you will probably score fewer points. If you play an elite team that is primarily strong on offense, the normal expectation would be that you will probably allow more points.

If it was as simple as you are saying then all the Pats had to do was send somebody with some speed like Slater or Underwood on a go route every down, just to draw coverage away from everyone else. Also don't forget that deep pass plays take much longer to develop; you're exposing Brady to more hits, more chance for strip sacks, lower chances of completions and higher chances of interceptions.

As for Ochocinco, I never understood the move other than he was supposed to replace Branch in the same role. Ochocinco at this point in his career is not a speed burning deep threat either, and that was apparent a year ago in Cincinnati.

I think many see the addition of a fast receiver as some sort of magic pill that will guarantee a championship, and I just don't see it that way. In my opinion upgrading the pass coverage and upgrading the pass rush is much more important to winning - especially, as you noted, in the playoffs.
Ron Sellers is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 02:54 PM   #97
In the Starting Line-up
 
robbomango's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: living in Oregon grew up in Revere MA
Posts: 2,428
Default Re: Borges: Condon puts Pats on call

I was looking at offensive receiving production the other day between NO, GB and posted these stats sided by side to get a better picture of the depth compared to NE.

It's petty amazing what TB accomplished given little backfield receiving production and no intermediate to deep threat. NO and GB have the full receiving package in spades in comparison.

with the 2TE 2WR set ideally that 2nd WR would be the intermediate to deep player, To Rons point.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Offensestats2011-12.jpg (102.5 KB, 84 views)
jmt57 likes this.
robbomango is online now  
Old 02-16-2012, 03:21 PM   #98
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,626
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Borges: Condon puts Pats on call

Quote:
Originally Posted by aabtec View Post
The Pats have lost the last two SB's to the Giants. Their SB wins are a distant memory.

The Pats need to start bringing in players and not just JAG's. The old days of just bringing in a bunch of players at a position does not work anymore.

This team needs play makers. BB won with the team BP and Carroll built.

His drafts have been mediocre. Trading down for future 1st rd picks has not helped.
Revisionist history at it's best.

Tom Brady, Matt Light, Stephen Neal, Mike Vrabel, Antowain Smith, Corey Dillon, Mike Compton, Joe Andruzzi, Anthony Pleasant, Ty Warren, Vince Wilfork, Charles Johnson, Deion Branch, David Givens, Richard Seymour, Greg Robinson-Randall, Jarvis Green, Dan Koppen, Rodney Harrison.

Tom Ashworth, Russ Hochstein, Larry Izzo, Damon Huard, Matt Chatham, Bobby Hamilton, Patrick Pass, Grey Reugemer, Lonnie Paxton, Bryan Cox, Marc Edwards, Heath Evans, Roman Phifer, JR Redmond, Otis Smith, Christian Fauria, Larry Centers, Fred Baxter, Don Davis, Daniel Graham.

The Parcells/Pete Carroll Contributions were:

Parcells:
Law, Bruschi, Milloy, Johnson, Bledsoe, Vinatieri

Carroll:
Tebucky Jones, Greg Spires, Kevin Faulk, Damien Woody


To say that the SBs were won with the team that Parcells/Carroll built is a bold-faced lie.

The Parcells and Carroll tenures provided some pieces, but the TEAM was assembled by Belichick. That's plain and clear to anyone.
jmt57 and PatsLancer27 like this.
DaBruinz is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 03:21 PM   #99
Practice Squad
 
Patsfan1102's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: VA
Posts: 121
My Mood: Cool
Default Re: Borges: Condon puts Pats on call

Quote:
Originally Posted by vyrago View Post
Wasn't it off his fingertips? He should have made that int, but the catch wasn't THAT easy.
Welker catch was much easier then the INT. It was easy money I make that catch 9 out of 10.
__________________
BREAKIN' THE LAW! BREAKIN' THE LAAAW! BREAKIN' THE LAW! BREAKIN' THE LAAAW!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Patsfan1102 is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 03:28 PM   #100
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,626
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Borges: Condon puts Pats on call

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah T. View Post
Colston has red flags???

In what regard?? He makes all his noise on the field with quality production. He never opens his mouth.

He hasn't missed a game in 3+ seasons (61 straight games)

Playoff game numbers this year... Det- 7, 120, (long 40 yards)
SF- 9, 136, 1TD (long 31 yards)

I don't know what his red flags are...The guy shows up to play every day and keeps his mouth shut.
Marques Colston, WR for the New Orleans Saints at NFL.com

http://www.neworleanssaints.com/team...d-66201d1d7ea1

Clearly, you are wrong. Colston missed 2 games and parts of 2 more this year and missed 1 and parts of others the year before as well. Colston didn't miss any time in 2009. But that was the last time he played in all 16 games. And he's only had 2 seasons out of 6 where he's been healthy.

So, he has injury flags.
DaBruinz is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Silver: Risky call puts Belichick in bad company SVN PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 5 11-17-2009 04:31 PM
Ron Borges Picks the PATS!!! (merged: Borges explains pick to BSM) bakes781 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 31 01-20-2007 09:00 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC