Pats Games on TV - Page 4 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-06-2008, 10:25 AM   #31
In the Starting Line-up
 
Sivy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 2,910
My Mood: Cheerful
Send a message via AIM to Sivy
Default Re: Pats Games on TV

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill219 View Post
Me too. I live in Cornelius, NC and have to have my Sox and Pats and Celts games.

According to the DVR guide, the preseason game vs The Ravens will be on MASN

I do not know if it is going to be blacked out for me.

For MLB, this area falls under Baltimore/Nationals blackout rules area, I do not know how it works for the NFL.
Me either, but its preseason so i dont really care. I hate preseason, it should be ended, and teams should be allowed to plan scrimage games with other teams on their own, if they feel its needed.
__________________
"The people who are claiming that the Pats are dead are the same ones who would go up and check if Jason Voorhees is "really" dead by leaning over his body." -Someone at jetnation.
Sivy is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 08-06-2008, 11:57 AM   #32
Moderator
 
jmt57's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,214
Blog Entries: 20
Default Re: Pats Games on TV

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sivy View Post
Me either, but its preseason so i dont really care. I hate preseason, it should be ended, and teams should be allowed to plan scrimage games with other teams on their own, if they feel its needed.
Though that is indeed what should happen, making it happen is a difficult business decision. Even teams that play the HOF preseason game have the option of playing one less game (for a total of 4, rather than 5) but they don't. The owners are intoxicated by the revenue stream. Fans are charged full price for tickets, and if you want season tickets then you have to buy the preseason games. Meanwhile the costs are low because players are paid the same amount of money whether there are three, four or five preseason games.

For there to be less preseason games, the owners would need to find a way to either increase their revenue or reduce their expenses in order to offset the profit lost from those missing games. Asking the players to take an across the board cut in pay would be like admitting to the NFLPA that you've been ripping them off for preseason games. Increasing per game ticket prices so that the total amount for nine home games equals what is now ten home games would help, but the team still loses all that concession and parking revenue.

One other thing to consider is that the NFL has evolved in to a twelve months per year business. They keep themselves in the news year round with free agency, the draft, hall of fame voting, minicamps, training camp and preseason games. Certain things happen directly opposite other sporting events, which is probably not a coincidence. Reducing the number of preseason games reduces the amount of NFL news, which does not fit in with their agenda of sports domination.

The best time to make a change is when the next collective bargaining agreement is worked out. If it is part of the entire package, then it could be worked out. It's a very remote possibility, because both the owners and the players would have to be willing to accept less than what they are currently getting, so it is very unlikely. Unless or until the fans make a collective statement by not attending or watching preseason games though, the owners don't have an incentive to cut back the number of August games.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
jmt57 is online now  
Old 08-06-2008, 12:01 PM   #33
In the Starting Line-up
 
ScottieC's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,029
My Mood: Pensive
Default Re: Pats Games on TV

Yea, I'm not a pre season fan either.

That being said, I think that Rodger Doger Good"Gawd Look what I have done"Ell will soon be cutting the preseason to 2 or 3 games and making the regular season 17-18 games long.

That'd be cool. Another record for us to break.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Let them all talk - Haters Hate, that's what they do - We have three Lombardi's, how about you?
ScottieC is offline  
Old 08-06-2008, 12:08 PM   #34
In the Starting Line-up
 
Sivy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 2,910
My Mood: Cheerful
Send a message via AIM to Sivy
Default Re: Pats Games on TV

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmt57 View Post
Though that is indeed what should happen, making it happen is a difficult business decision. Even teams that play the HOF preseason game have the option of playing one less game (for a total of 4, rather than 5) but they don't. The owners are intoxicated by the revenue stream. Fans are charged full price for tickets, and if you want season tickets then you have to buy the preseason games. Meanwhile the costs are low because players are paid the same amount of money whether there are three, four or five preseason games.

For there to be less preseason games, the owners would need to find a way to either increase their revenue or reduce their expenses in order to offset the profit lost from those missing games. Asking the players to take an across the board cut in pay would be like admitting to the NFLPA that you've been ripping them off for preseason games. Increasing per game ticket prices so that the total amount for nine home games equals what is now ten home games would help, but the team still loses all that concession and parking revenue.

One other thing to consider is that the NFL has evolved in to a twelve months per year business. They keep themselves in the news year round with free agency, the draft, hall of fame voting, minicamps, training camp and preseason games. Certain things happen directly opposite other sporting events, which is probably not a coincidence. Reducing the number of preseason games reduces the amount of NFL news, which does not fit in with their agenda of sports domination.

The best time to make a change is when the next collective bargaining agreement is worked out. If it is part of the entire package, then it could be worked out. It's a very remote possibility, because both the owners and the players would have to be willing to accept less than what they are currently getting, so it is very unlikely. Unless or until the fans make a collective statement by not attending or watching preseason games though, the owners don't have an incentive to cut back the number of August games.

From a business point of view, all of that is correct. But how would business be if Brady went down in preseason week 3? Or any major player on any team. Sure, season ticket holders would have already paid, but how about if they stop going to the games and spending 10 dollars on beer, or whatever else they buy while at the games. And the guy that doesnt have season tickets and is willing to buy individual tickets to every game he can...is he going to go wath matt cassel leading the 1-7 patriots? I dont think so.
Maybe the odds of a player getting injured are weighed against the odds of making money on preseason games, but sometimes things have to to qualitivative rather than quantitative.
__________________
"The people who are claiming that the Pats are dead are the same ones who would go up and check if Jason Voorhees is "really" dead by leaning over his body." -Someone at jetnation.
Sivy is offline  
Old 08-06-2008, 04:43 PM   #35
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
 
Deus Irae's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35,447
Default Re: Pats Games on TV

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sivy View Post
From a business point of view, all of that is correct. But how would business be if Brady went down in preseason week 3? Or any major player on any team. Sure, season ticket holders would have already paid, but how about if they stop going to the games and spending 10 dollars on beer, or whatever else they buy while at the games. And the guy that doesnt have season tickets and is willing to buy individual tickets to every game he can...is he going to go wath matt cassel leading the 1-7 patriots? I dont think so.
Maybe the odds of a player getting injured are weighed against the odds of making money on preseason games, but sometimes things have to to qualitivative rather than quantitative.
Patriots v. Green Bay strike a cord?
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
Deus Irae is offline  
Old 08-06-2008, 05:18 PM   #36
Moderator
 
jmt57's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,214
Blog Entries: 20
Default Re: Pats Games on TV

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sivy View Post
From a business point of view, all of that is correct. But how would business be if Brady went down in preseason week 3? Or any major player on any team. Sure, season ticket holders would have already paid, but how about if they stop going to the games and spending 10 dollars on beer, or whatever else they buy while at the games. And the guy that doesnt have season tickets and is willing to buy individual tickets to every game he can...is he going to go wath matt cassel leading the 1-7 patriots? I dont think so.
Maybe the odds of a player getting injured are weighed against the odds of making money on preseason games, but sometimes things have to to qualitivative rather than quantitative.
There are two different business aspects to consider when we speculate on the effect a player such as Brady going down in a preseason game would have - that of the team and that of the NFL. For the reasons you point out above, it would have a major affect on the Patriots. However, it would be negligible from the NFL's perspective. While it could result in no-shows at Gilette should the team not be able to overcome his loss, the injury would have an equally opposite, positive affect on one or more teams within the division. The Bills and Jets, for example, could have greater interest as they battle for a division title, and some other team in the AFC also has greater interest generated as they make a successful playoff run. The networks could hype Chargers vs Colts rather than Pats vs Colts.

An extreme example would be what happened in Atlanta without Mike Vick. It had a devastating affect on the Falcons from a business perspective, but another team was able to profit from winning a division title and hosting a playoff game, while other players replaced Vick's role in the NFL marketing machine.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
jmt57 is online now  
Old 08-06-2008, 08:19 PM   #37
In the Starting Line-up
 
Sivy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 2,910
My Mood: Cheerful
Send a message via AIM to Sivy
Default Re: Pats Games on TV

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmt57 View Post
There are two different business aspects to consider when we speculate on the effect a player such as Brady going down in a preseason game would have - that of the team and that of the NFL. For the reasons you point out above, it would have a major affect on the Patriots. However, it would be negligible from the NFL's perspective. While it could result in no-shows at Gilette should the team not be able to overcome his loss, the injury would have an equally opposite, positive affect on one or more teams within the division. The Bills and Jets, for example, could have greater interest as they battle for a division title, and some other team in the AFC also has greater interest generated as they make a successful playoff run. The networks could hype Chargers vs Colts rather than Pats vs Colts.

An extreme example would be what happened in Atlanta without Mike Vick. It had a devastating affect on the Falcons from a business perspective, but another team was able to profit from winning a division title and hosting a playoff game, while other players replaced Vick's role in the NFL marketing machine.
I think tv netwoks would much rather see a patriots run, than a bills or jets battle for the wild card. The patriots are a big draw, which makes them good for the nfl (no matter how much we want to belive that the nfl hates them) the NFL LOVES the patriots winning so many games, and "running up the score" they'd much rather have that to offer than some other set of teams that are doing OK because tom brady isnt injured.

Mike Vic and Atlant, is no tom brady and new england.
__________________
"The people who are claiming that the Pats are dead are the same ones who would go up and check if Jason Voorhees is "really" dead by leaning over his body." -Someone at jetnation.
Sivy is offline  
Old 08-06-2008, 08:40 PM   #38
Rookie
 

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 23
Default Re: Pats Games on TV

anyone have the old fashioned dish (before direct tv)
just wondering what satelite and channel
the pats vs ravens feed will be on this thursday
Its hard to find a bar in phoenix with the old dish
to get LIVE preseason pats games
vvusteve is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC