(Mod Edited Title) Warner on SB 36: Pats' Hitting Receivers/Faulk Pushed the Envelope - Page 4 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree15Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-01-2012, 02:20 PM   #31
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
Uncle Rico's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Shore. No; north of there.
Posts: 7,021
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default re: (Mod Edited Title) Warner on SB 36: Pats' Hitting Receivers/Faulk Pushed the Envelope

Quote:
Originally Posted by letekro View Post
"Holding wins championships"
heh - -yeah, one in particular comes to mind.
__________________
"If they sought to intimidate us, to terrorize us, to shake us from ... the values that make us who we are, as Americans -- well, it should be pretty clear by now that they picked the wrong city to do it. Not here in Boston. Not here in Boston."
—President Barack Obama, April 18, 2013



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Uncle Rico is online now  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-01-2012, 02:29 PM   #32
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 602
Default re: (Mod Edited Title) Warner on SB 36: Pats' Hitting Receivers/Faulk Pushed the Envelope

Just saw the NFL films half hour bit on this game on Sunday. I had the same thought that Warner expressed just - the way the game is being called now, there is no way the Patriots could have played the way they did. For example, chances are very good that if the game were played today, Vrabel would have been called for RTP, negating the Law interception.

I always laugh when people say that if the Patriots and Rams had played nine more times, the Rams would have won all nine. The Patriots were by far the more physical team. Ram WRs were trying to burrow underground to avoid the fearsome hits that the Patriot DBs were dishing out. New England was the better team.

I have no problem with Warner's observation. But the game was played in 2002 and that's the way they called it.
PatsWickedPissah likes this.
__________________
"And the anger and the yearning, like fever in my veins, set the fire burning ..." WZ
Zeus is online now  
Old 02-01-2012, 02:47 PM   #33
Maude
 
shmessy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,201
Default Re: (Mod Edited Title) Warner on SB 36: Pats' Hitting Receivers/Faulk Pushed the Enve

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Rico View Post
Honestly, I think the title of this thread leaves the impression he's calling up "Spygate" again and it's not that at all.

I really don't have much argument with most of what he said (and I'm no Kurt Warner fan). It's no secret the rules have been emphasized much differently since then. It's also no secret that refs are less likely to call a penalty in the playoffs (someone else on this board recently pointed out, maybe this is one reason why "defense wins championships.")

A sample quote:
Exactly.

I just edited the title and am trusting that the OP didn't actually mean to mislead folks.

It obviously had nothing to do with Cameragate.
__________________
"They (Patriots) may be the greatest team ever" - Chris Mortenson, January 18, 2005 on espn.com
shmessy is offline  
Old 02-01-2012, 02:47 PM   #34
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 89
My Mood: Happy
Default Re: Warner takes media bait on Super Bowl 36: Pats' actions may not have been "legal"

The rules of the 2011 REGULAR season are clearly not being applied to the postseason. This is the case for most post seasons.

Except for maybe 2005-2006 after Polian crying, this has always been the case.

The first two fumbles in the Saints game were great examples, Donte Whitner lights up the Saints running back immediately after catching the ball. This has been a 15 yard flag all year on hitting a defenseless receiver. No call.

On the next series Alex Smith took a massive head shot from Roman Harper and fumbles, No call.

Quarterbacks and receivers were babied all regular season. That is not happening in the post season.

Even the Pats-Ravens game... That first illegal contact penalty was like an early free call for being the home team. After that the only penalty I remember was when Benny had his helmet ripped off which they had to call.

What Kurt Warner is saying is 100% ridiculous. I have no doubt Warner would have thrown for 5k+++ yards in the regular season if the same regular season rules applied today were in place in 1999 - 2001, but the Postseason rules are exactly the same. There are none.
hughthehand is offline  
Old 02-01-2012, 03:15 PM   #35
On the Roster
 
PatsGator's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Gainesville, FL from Whitman, MA
Posts: 55
Default Re: Warner takes media bait on Super Bowl 36: Pats' actions may not have been "legal"

Brady should come out and say that if the rules of football were the same as they were decades ago, the Patriots would have crushed St. Louis because they were too wimpy to play with the broken noses the Pats would have given them because of the nonexistent facemasks.
PatsGator is offline  
Old 02-01-2012, 03:59 PM   #36
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
strongside's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 574
Default Re: (Mod Edited Title) Warner on SB 36: Pats' Hitting Receivers/Faulk Pushed the Enve

Ok Rams you win. All of your *****ing about filming coaches, walkthroughs, practices, beating up WR's, pushing Faulk around, hitting warner in the helmet has worn me down.

Congratulations, you are now the 2001 SB champs. Now can you go away?
Bella*chick likes this.
__________________
“We'll do the injury report on Wednesday.”
strongside is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Defiantly Pushing the Envelope Mrs.PatsFanInVa Political Discussion 11 04-30-2010 11:56 PM
Rangel calls for draft (Harry's title edited by Patters) Harry Boy Political Discussion 15 11-21-2006 02:37 PM
Pats have pushed out over $8 millon of SB money into the future Miguel PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 12 09-16-2004 12:21 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC