ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.
I was reading through the Franchise Tag information in the CBA because of the talk of Mario Williams potentially becoming a free agent due to the Texans lack of cap space. And I found that the equation for the franchise tag has changed and is more complex than before.
Quote:
The Nonexclusive Franchise Tender
shall be a one year NFL Player Contract for (A) the average of the five largest Prior Year Salaries for players at the position (within the categories set forth in Section 7(a) below) at which the Franchise Player participated in the most plays during the prior League Year, which average shall be calculated by: (1) summing the amounts of the Franchise Tags for players at that position for the five preceding League Years; (2) dividing the resulting amount by the sum of the Salary Caps for the five preceding League Years (using the average of the amounts of the 2009 and 2011 Salary Caps as the Salary Cap amount for the 2010 League Year); and (3) multiplying the resulting percentage by the
Salary Cap for the upcoming League Year (e.g., when calculating the Tender for the 2012 League Year, dividing the aggregate sum of the Franchise Tags for players at that position for the 2007–2011 League Years by the aggregate sum of the Salary Caps for the 2007–2011 League Years and multiplying the result by the amount of the Salary Cap for the 2012 League Year) (the “Cap Percentage Average”) (
Set forth below are hypothetical examples for illustrative purposes only.
Example 1: Calculation of the Non-Exclusive Franchise Tender for a linebacker for the 2012 League Year:
2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 ’11–’07 Sum
Franchise Tag* N/A $10.091 $9.68 $8.304 $8.065 $7.206 $43.346
Salary Cap $125.0 $120.375 $121.6875 $123.0 $116.0 $109.0 $590.0625
*Note: the “Franchise Tag” for 2011 equals the average of the five largest Salaries (as defined in Article 10) for linebackers from the 2010 League Year; the “Franchise Tag” for 2010 equals the average of the five largest Salaries (as defined in Article 10) for linebackers from the 2009 League Year, and so on.
Σ (Franchise Tags 2007–2011) ÷ Σ (Salary Caps 2007 –2011) = 7.346% ($43.346 ÷ $590.0625). If the 2012 Salary Cap was $125 million, then the 2012 Non-Exclusive Franchise Tender for a linebacker would be $9.183 million (7.346% of $125 million), or 120% of the player’s 2011 Salary (as defined in Article 10), whichever is greater.
I believe that this is designed to roll back the franchise tag numbers a bit, but it's definitely a major difference that really didn't get talked about previously. And it will have a direct effect on the negotiations with Wes Welker..
I wonder if Miguel has the franchise tag numbers from the previous years somewhere in his files..
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz
I was reading through the Franchise Tag information in the CBA because of the talk of Mario Williams potentially becoming a free agent due to the Texans lack of cap space. And I found that the equation for the franchise tag has changed and is more complex than before.
I believe that this is designed to roll back the franchise tag numbers a bit, but it's definitely a major difference that really didn't get talked about previously. And it will have a direct effect on the negotiations with Wes Welker..
I wonder if Miguel has the franchise tag numbers from the previous years somewhere in his files..
I don't know if that necessary reduces it. It sounds like they are calculating the % of the cap the franchise tag for that position took up historically and using that to normalize it.
Therefore, the tag number will now increase proportionately to the cap, rather than current contracts.
Re: Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson
I don't know if that necessary reduces it. It sounds like they are calculating the % of the cap the franchise tag for that position took up historically and using that to normalize it.
Therefore, the tag number will now increase proportionately to the cap, rather than current contracts.
It's a bit weird: the numerators are based on current contracts; the denominators are based on the salary cap.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.
It has reduced them. Tag for WR's was over $11M last season. This year it is projected by the new method to be $9.4M. There were multiple articles written on the subject months ago. It also helps the Saints because the tag for QB's is just $14.5M, and it was $14.2m three years ago when Cassel was tagged and almost $16M in 2011.
Good article from Andrew Brandt with some more guesstimated figures.
Re: Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson
I don't know if that necessary reduces it. It sounds like they are calculating the % of the cap the franchise tag for that position took up historically and using that to normalize it.
Therefore, the tag number will now increase proportionately to the cap, rather than current contracts.
That sounds right to me.
For example, if the average of the top-5 salaries of quarterbacks corresponded to 25% of the total cap number in the last 5 years (i.e. "franchise" numbers increased exactly proportionately to the cap) and the cap for the upcoming year goes up 10%, then the franchise number for quarterbacks will go up 10% to keep it at 25% of the cap.
Which doesn't *reduce* franchise numbers so much as smooth them out when there is an anomalous year.
__________________
My prized possessions: Our family pictures; my dad and me getting doused by Bruschi in Super Bowl XXXIX [Shalize Manza Young Up Close with ... Bill Belichick]
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
They say what doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Well, Pats fans should be invincible by now. [Fitzy, 16 November 2009]
Re: Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.
All I read was Mario Williams. What is his franchise tag number and will the Texans let him walk? (Their defense was damn impressive without their best player).
Re: Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewgarrr
All I read was Mario Williams. What is his franchise tag number and will the Texans let him walk? (Their defense was damn impressive without their best player).
Barwin or Reed would sit in the 34 for Williams, he's not a 34 DE. But, like you said, they lost him very early in the season and had a top tier defense without him, Barwin made him expendable. No reason to pay top dollar for him when you don't even know if he can play in the 34, he never had a chance to prove it this year.
Re: Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.
I think we can all agree that Planet Hoosten has a tremendous young Defense, plenty of Depth at Flanker ~ OutSide LineBacker, to you Earthlings ~ and has MUCH better things to do with their Cap Dollars than to waste them on Mario Williams...Cut the bum LOOSE, I say!!
__________________
My prized possessions: Our family pictures; my dad and me getting doused by Bruschi in Super Bowl XXXIX [Shalize Manza Young Up Close with ... Bill Belichick]
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
They say what doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Well, Pats fans should be invincible by now. [Fitzy, 16 November 2009]