Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation. - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree6Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-28-2012, 11:54 AM   #1
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,643
My Mood: Amused
Default Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.

I was reading through the Franchise Tag information in the CBA because of the talk of Mario Williams potentially becoming a free agent due to the Texans lack of cap space. And I found that the equation for the franchise tag has changed and is more complex than before.

Quote:
The Nonexclusive Franchise Tender
shall be a one year NFL Player Contract for (A) the average of the five largest Prior Year Salaries for players at the position (within the categories set forth in Section 7(a) below) at which the Franchise Player participated in the most plays during the prior League Year, which average shall be calculated by: (1) summing the amounts of the Franchise Tags for players at that position for the five preceding League Years; (2) dividing the resulting amount by the sum of the Salary Caps for the five preceding League Years (using the average of the amounts of the 2009 and 2011 Salary Caps as the Salary Cap amount for the 2010 League Year); and (3) multiplying the resulting percentage by the
Salary Cap for the upcoming League Year (e.g., when calculating the Tender for the 2012 League Year, dividing the aggregate sum of the Franchise Tags for players at that position for the 2007–2011 League Years by the aggregate sum of the Salary Caps for the 2007–2011 League Years and multiplying the result by the amount of the Salary Cap for the 2012 League Year) (the “Cap Percentage Average”) (

And here is the Appendix E example:
http://www.thenetrat.com/cba-2011-2020.pdf
Quote:
Set forth below are hypothetical examples for illustrative purposes only.
Example 1: Calculation of the Non-Exclusive Franchise Tender for a linebacker for the 2012 League Year:
2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 ’11–’07 Sum
Franchise Tag* N/A $10.091 $9.68 $8.304 $8.065 $7.206 $43.346
Salary Cap $125.0 $120.375 $121.6875 $123.0 $116.0 $109.0 $590.0625

*Note: the “Franchise Tag” for 2011 equals the average of the five largest Salaries (as defined in Article 10) for linebackers from the 2010 League Year; the “Franchise Tag” for 2010 equals the average of the five largest Salaries (as defined in Article 10) for linebackers from the 2009 League Year, and so on.

Σ (Franchise Tags 2007–2011) ÷ Σ (Salary Caps 2007 –2011) = 7.346% ($43.346 ÷ $590.0625). If the 2012 Salary Cap was $125 million, then the 2012 Non-Exclusive Franchise Tender for a linebacker would be $9.183 million (7.346% of $125 million), or 120% of the player’s 2011 Salary (as defined in Article 10), whichever is greater.
I believe that this is designed to roll back the franchise tag numbers a bit, but it's definitely a major difference that really didn't get talked about previously. And it will have a direct effect on the negotiations with Wes Welker..

I wonder if Miguel has the franchise tag numbers from the previous years somewhere in his files..
PATSNUTme and Gwedd like this.
DaBruinz is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-28-2012, 12:06 PM   #2
PatsFans.com Veteran
 
AndyJohnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18,759
Default Re: Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
I was reading through the Franchise Tag information in the CBA because of the talk of Mario Williams potentially becoming a free agent due to the Texans lack of cap space. And I found that the equation for the franchise tag has changed and is more complex than before.




And here is the Appendix E example:
http://www.thenetrat.com/cba-2011-2020.pdf


I believe that this is designed to roll back the franchise tag numbers a bit, but it's definitely a major difference that really didn't get talked about previously. And it will have a direct effect on the negotiations with Wes Welker..

I wonder if Miguel has the franchise tag numbers from the previous years somewhere in his files..
I don't know if that necessary reduces it. It sounds like they are calculating the % of the cap the franchise tag for that position took up historically and using that to normalize it.
Therefore, the tag number will now increase proportionately to the cap, rather than current contracts.
AndyJohnson is offline  
Old 01-28-2012, 03:41 PM   #3
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,690
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson View Post
I don't know if that necessary reduces it. It sounds like they are calculating the % of the cap the franchise tag for that position took up historically and using that to normalize it.
Therefore, the tag number will now increase proportionately to the cap, rather than current contracts.
It's a bit weird: the numerators are based on current contracts; the denominators are based on the salary cap.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline  
Old 01-28-2012, 03:49 PM   #4
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default Re: Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.

It has reduced them. Tag for WR's was over $11M last season. This year it is projected by the new method to be $9.4M. There were multiple articles written on the subject months ago. It also helps the Saints because the tag for QB's is just $14.5M, and it was $14.2m three years ago when Cassel was tagged and almost $16M in 2011.

Good article from Andrew Brandt with some more guesstimated figures.

Tougher Game of Tag | National Football Post
MoLewisrocks is offline  
Old 01-28-2012, 04:01 PM   #5
Minuteman Target
 
Mike the Brit's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,046
Default Re: Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson View Post
I don't know if that necessary reduces it. It sounds like they are calculating the % of the cap the franchise tag for that position took up historically and using that to normalize it.
Therefore, the tag number will now increase proportionately to the cap, rather than current contracts.
That sounds right to me.

For example, if the average of the top-5 salaries of quarterbacks corresponded to 25% of the total cap number in the last 5 years (i.e. "franchise" numbers increased exactly proportionately to the cap) and the cap for the upcoming year goes up 10%, then the franchise number for quarterbacks will go up 10% to keep it at 25% of the cap.

Which doesn't *reduce* franchise numbers so much as smooth them out when there is an anomalous year.
__________________
My prized possessions: Our family pictures; my dad and me getting doused by Bruschi in Super Bowl XXXIX [Shalize Manza Young Up Close with ... Bill Belichick]


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


They say what doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Well, Pats fans should be invincible by now. [Fitzy, 16 November 2009]

Still here to learn
Mike the Brit is online now  
Old 01-28-2012, 04:08 PM   #6
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,519
Default Re: Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.

All I read was Mario Williams. What is his franchise tag number and will the Texans let him walk? (Their defense was damn impressive without their best player).

Potential Houston front seven:

Williams - Cody - Watt
Barwin - Cushing - Ryans - Reed

Holy sh1t.
andrewgarrr is online now  
Old 01-28-2012, 04:34 PM   #7
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default Re: Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.

Here are all the projected guesstimated numbers from NFL.com. Williams will get 120% of his 2011 tag if he is re-tagged.

Franchise-tag values for 2012

Figures for next season by position and players who could be impacted

Quarterback: $14.4 million (down from $16.1 million in 2011, $16.4 million in 2010); Drew Brees

Running back: $7.7 million (down from $9.6 million in 2011, $8.2 million in 2010); Matt Forte, Ray Rice

Wide receiver: $9.4 million (down from 11.4 million in 2011, $9.5 million in 2010); DeSean Jackson, Vincent Jackson*, Steve Johnson, Wes Welker

Tight end: $5.4 million (down from $7.3 million in 2011, $5.9 million in 2010); Fred Davis, Jermichael Finley

Offensive line: $9.4 million (down from $10.1 million in 2011, $10.7 million in 2010); Ben Grubbs, Carl Nicks

Defensive end: $10.6 million (down from $13 million in 2011, $12.4 million in 2010); Jason Jones, Mario Williams*

Defensive tackle: $7.9 million (down from $12.5 million in 2011; it was $7 million in 2010); Paul Soliai*

Linebacker: $8.8 million (down from $10.1 million in 2011, $9.7 million in 2010); Stephen Tulloch

Cornerback: $10.6 million (down from $13.5 million in 2011; tag was $9.6 million in 2010); Cortland Finnegan, Brent Grimes

Safety: $6.2 million (down from $8.8 million in 2011, $6.5 million in 2010); LaRon Landry

* - Player who'd receive more money because it'd be his second year in a row on the franchise tag, meaning he'd make 120 percent of his 2011 salary
PATSNUTme likes this.
MoLewisrocks is offline  
Old 01-28-2012, 05:32 PM   #8
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pittston, PA
Posts: 2,487
My Mood: Sick
Default Re: Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewgarrr View Post
All I read was Mario Williams. What is his franchise tag number and will the Texans let him walk? (Their defense was damn impressive without their best player).

Potential Houston front seven:

Williams - Cody - Watt
Barwin - Cushing - Ryans - Reed

Holy sh1t.
Barwin or Reed would sit in the 34 for Williams, he's not a 34 DE. But, like you said, they lost him very early in the season and had a top tier defense without him, Barwin made him expendable. No reason to pay top dollar for him when you don't even know if he can play in the 34, he never had a chance to prove it this year.
strngplyr is offline  
Old 01-28-2012, 06:12 PM   #9
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
Off The Grid's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,016
Default Re: Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.

I think we can all agree that Planet Hoosten has a tremendous young Defense, plenty of Depth at Flanker ~ OutSide LineBacker, to you Earthlings ~ and has MUCH better things to do with their Cap Dollars than to waste them on Mario Williams...Cut the bum LOOSE, I say!!
ctpatsfan77 and Gwedd like this.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

It All Starts In The Trenches.

Run The Damned Ball.

Use The Whole Pig.

Develop & Deploy a Tenacious D!!

Drive the Enemy before you...and savor the Lamentations of their Women!!

Count the Rings.

Rinse & Repeat.

Off The Grid is offline  
Old 01-28-2012, 06:43 PM   #10
Minuteman Target
 
Mike the Brit's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,046
Default Re: Semi OT: Looks like they changed the Franchise Tag Equation.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Truly LOVE that sig!
Off The Grid likes this.
__________________
My prized possessions: Our family pictures; my dad and me getting doused by Bruschi in Super Bowl XXXIX [Shalize Manza Young Up Close with ... Bill Belichick]


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


They say what doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Well, Pats fans should be invincible by now. [Fitzy, 16 November 2009]

Still here to learn
Mike the Brit is online now  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The BUSH equation. TheSolderKing Political Discussion 4 05-09-2011 11:33 AM
Hal Turner, where does he fit into this equation??? DarrylS Political Discussion 1 10-30-2006 08:53 AM
Add Dan Koppen to the FA Equation rhubma PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 15 06-10-2006 11:13 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC