Slotting the 2011 Patriots defense - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree5Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-12-2011, 05:13 PM   #1
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
 
Deus Irae's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35,447
Default Slotting the 2011 Patriots defense

Ok, since there seems to be a lot of contention about the 2011 defense, Let's start with a simple foundation to see if we can at least find some areas of relative agreement:

Which players on the 2011 defense would start for the 2003-2004 defenses? To make it easier, Let's consider Wilfork obvious since he started in both 2004 and 2011. I'll also put down the list of "starters" from the group, just to make it more accessible to people. Legit starters from 2003-2004 may be left out, but it will be legit starters from that time that will be used. Also, I'll put in 3 cornerbacks for people to compare against so people can use the one they consider the weakest link as a comparison. Lastly, remember that you're comparing the level of play for the included years, not before or after.

D-Line: Seymour/Wilfork/Warren
LB: Vrabel/Bruschi/Johnson/McGinest
CB: Law/Samuel/Poole
S: Harrison/Wilson
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
Deus Irae is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 12-12-2011, 05:17 PM   #2
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
Shockt327's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 822
My Mood: Shocked
Default Re: Slotting the 2011 Patriots defense

Well, could Carter or Anderson play 3-4? I'm pretty sure they couldn't, so....
Shockt327 is offline  
Old 12-12-2011, 05:27 PM   #3
In the Starting Line-up
 
RodThePat's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,180
Default Re: Slotting the 2011 Patriots defense

Maybe Mayo in place of Johnson. That's it.
RodThePat is offline  
Old 12-12-2011, 05:27 PM   #4
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Rob0729's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 25,367
Default Re: Slotting the 2011 Patriots defense

The 2003 Patriots were the best defense in team history and one of the more underrated defenses in NFL history. Not really fair to compare this defense to that defense. The 2004 defense was slightly worse than 2003. Why not ask which players on this defense could start on the 2000 Ravens' team or the 1985 Bears team?

Ironically, the 2003 defense is more comparable to this year's offense because both had to carry the other side of the ball in a lot of games. The Pats had six games that year where they scored 17 points or less.
mgteich likes this.
Rob0729 is offline  
Old 12-12-2011, 05:29 PM   #5
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
patsinthesnow's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,419
Default Re: Slotting the 2011 Patriots defense

Uhhhhh.....

Mayo in replace of Johnson.

Arrington as CB 2 or 3?

Carter was bad as a 3-4 OLB, so not him.

That's it.
patsinthesnow is offline  
Old 12-12-2011, 05:30 PM   #6
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,114
Default Re: Slotting the 2011 Patriots defense

I agree. Carter wouldn't start in the 3-4.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RodThePat View Post
Maybe Mayo in place of Johnson. That's it.
mgteich is online now  
Old 12-12-2011, 05:31 PM   #7
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
ATippett56's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,075
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Slotting the 2011 Patriots defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729 View Post
Why not ask which players on this defense could start on the 2000 Ravens' team or the 1985 Bears team?
It's an apples to oranges comparison in the front seven of 4-3 defense vs 3-4 defense.
__________________
The End of the Chad Ochostinko Era!
ATippett56 is offline  
Old 12-12-2011, 05:31 PM   #8
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
robertweathers's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Central MA by way of the great state of New Hampshire
Posts: 7,377
Default Re: Slotting the 2011 Patriots defense

I'll play along.

No one on the line changes.

LB- Maybe Mayo for Johnson but I'd rather have Ted vs the run and Mayo for other plays.

CB-The 03 secondary stays intact. However in 04 Poole was never right and Law went down vs Pitt on Halloween. That left Asante and Randall Gay the starters and Hank Poteat as the nickel DB. With that said, I would take McCourty in '10 over everyone but 03 Law and '11 Arrington over everyone but '03 Law.

Part of me wonders if the '11 team had 03 Rodney back there, their pass defense would be measurably better.
__________________
“I'm not really concerned about the other 31 teams,” - Bill Belichick

"If a player has talent and doesn't succeed, that means that they either don't want to be successful or I have failed as a coach." - Bill Belichick

Last edited by robertweathers; 12-12-2011 at 05:43 PM..
robertweathers is offline  
Old 12-12-2011, 05:33 PM   #9
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,114
Default Re: Slotting the 2011 Patriots defense

So, we have gone from calling the defense one of the worst in nfl history to comparing it to one of the best in nfl history. What's the point?
shmessy likes this.
mgteich is online now  
Old 12-12-2011, 05:34 PM   #10
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Rob0729's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 25,367
Default Re: Slotting the 2011 Patriots defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATippett56 View Post
It's an apples to oranges comparison in the front seven of 4-3 defense vs 3-4 defense.
Huh?!? The Pats are running mostly a 4-3 this year.

My point was comparing one of the better defenses in league history to this defense is a slanted comparison.
Rob0729 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Schefter: Patriots trade Maroney to Denver for 2011 4th - Broncos get 2011 6 [merged] MoLewisrocks PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 426 09-18-2010 03:59 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563