ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
(Mods, please merge with other thread on CBA if necessary.)
__________________ Patriots Football... It is what it is!
Last edited by BradfordPatsFan; 05-20-2008 at 09:24 AM..
Reason: Addition of a link
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
Not surprising at all. None of the owners liked the current CBA. It was starting to make it hard for the small market teams to be competitive for players year after year. Larger market teams saw their profits from additional marketing initiatives like stadium sponsorships start to decline because they were forced to give up a lot more revenue to keep the smaller market teams afloat to pay for the increase in salaries.
I think if the CBA stayed in place, it would not be all that far away that the small market teams would be struggling to pay salaries and maintain day to day operations because a team like the Bills can only generate so much revenue and even revenue sharing can only do so much.
BTW, it is no coincidence that two small market teams are rumored to be up for sale. Both the Rams and Jags have pretty strong rumors of being shopped around. Add Buffalo soon to be up for sale (within the next few years) and probably moving to Toronto around 2013.
I am surprised it was unanimous...solidarity from ALL owners..Goodell on the other side?? THAT is interesting...what does that say about his future? This is a complex issue, especially with the economy tanking. With a stronger economy, it might have been more viable long term, but with things liek now, it might have been the only REAL option..a way for all parties to look at the situation NOW and solve it more long term. If Tags was around, I would think it was possible, but with this schmuck, I don't know if that will be possible. This could be the start of the downfall of the league. Upshaw might keep peddling the 'we won't go under 60%' figure, but with the threat of franchises folding, when faced with reality, I believe his tune will change. This is the REAL issue I believe that who love football should be looking at...I wonder how many of these idiot sportwriters will delve into it in detail?
I am surprised it was unanimous...solidarity from ALL owners..Goodell on the other side?? THAT is interesting...what does that say about his future?
Goodell will eliminate the first round of the NFL draft this year, and suspend the owners for 8 weeks to a season, depending on market size. Goodell will cite "unprecidented punishment" as his logic. When told that it is impossible to remove the first round of the draft, Goodell will suspend his intern. He will then go put his cowboy hat back on and get on his rocking horse, shooting his play six-shooter at the TV.
I am surprised it was unanimous...solidarity from ALL owners..Goodell on the other side?? THAT is interesting...what does that say about his future? This is a complex issue, especially with the economy tanking. With a stronger economy, it might have been more viable long term, but with things liek now, it might have been the only REAL option..a way for all parties to look at the situation NOW and solve it more long term. If Tags was around, I would think it was possible, but with this schmuck, I don't know if that will be possible. This could be the start of the downfall of the league. Upshaw might keep peddling the 'we won't go under 60%' figure, but with the threat of franchises folding, when faced with reality, I believe his tune will change. This is the REAL issue I believe that who love football should be looking at...I wonder how many of these idiot sportwriters will delve into it in detail?
Just as an FYI, one of the franchises with the least amount of revenue income made over $25 million in profit last year (Buffalo).
So, it's not like we're talking about a failing industry.
This may have been a necessary move for the small market owners
but why is it good news? It could be the end of the salary cap and
the draft. The NFL would be like baseball with wealthy teams like the
Yankees and Red Sox with all the good players. The only party that
benefits from a situation like this is the new football league that
starts operations in 2009. With Gene Upshaw in charge of the player's
union, no good can come of this because Upshaw has dug in his heels
demanding 60 % of total revenues.
It's good because it was necessary. Without it, the league was in big trouble. With it, the new CBA will, hopefully, feature:
Less money for the players
Less power to discipline for the Ommissioner, and clearer guidelines for it
A more equitable distribution of ownership monies
A rookie wage scale of some sort
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius