Wierdest part of 4-3 Defensive Philosophy - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree7Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-25-2011, 05:58 PM   #1
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
DonBlackmon55's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,499
My Mood: Daring
Default Wierdest part of 4-3 Defensive Philosophy

Seems to be that the switch was made to 4-3 to become a more attacking Defense. However, despite that scheme change, combined with all the personnel moves, the "personality" of this defense remains unchanged - passive.

There is no leadership on the field with this defense, anywhere. Just 11 guys running around like chickens with their heads cut off. Back then with Vrabel, Rodney, Bru, law, even if the team was not as talented "on paper" with the defensive stud athletes, they played smart and had mental toughness.

Last few years of adding average players like TBC, Burgess, now pick your litter of others, combined with poor drafting has caught up. Rather than adding impact players to a good group of vets and make this Defense absolute terror, BB gambled away picks for more depth type average players like Butler, Brace, Spikes, Cunningham, Crable, McKenzie, Willhite, wheatley, merriwether......list is unending. Either they were busts or could not be coached up.

So, what we have left today is a Defense with no impact players, identity, or even a threat the other teams need to account for. A defense that has no key cogs to be able to play 3-4, or terrorize other Offenses with pass rushing 4-3 DT/DE's

Gonna be a looooooooong season.

They way Raiders are kicking Jesters around, Pats are in for one heck of a streetfight next week. and then.......Plaxico vs. McToasty, uuuggh
captain stone likes this.
DonBlackmon55 is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 09-25-2011, 06:00 PM   #2
Rookie
 

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 13
My Mood: In Love
Default Re: Wierdest part of 4-3 Defensive Philosophy

Hey what up? BILLS WON I TOLD ALL OF YOU. WHOOOOOO!
Fitz>Brady is offline  
Old 09-25-2011, 06:00 PM   #3
In the Starting Line-up
 
TriplecHamp's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Dirty
Posts: 4,940
My Mood: Cool
Default Re: Wierdest part of 4-3 Defensive Philosophy

McCourty is going to be thoroughly embarrassed if he doesn't start playing the ball and getting his hands on the receiver. Plaxico's bread and butter is that fade.
captain stone likes this.
TriplecHamp is offline  
Old 09-25-2011, 06:01 PM   #4
In the Starting Line-up
 
TriplecHamp's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Dirty
Posts: 4,940
My Mood: Cool
Default Re: Wierdest part of 4-3 Defensive Philosophy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitz>Brady View Post
Hey what up? BILLS WON I TOLD ALL OF YOU. WHOOOOOO!
in b4 30 responses to this painfully obvious troll.
TriplecHamp is offline  
Old 09-25-2011, 06:05 PM   #5
Rookie
 

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 13
My Mood: In Love
Default Re: Wierdest part of 4-3 Defensive Philosophy

Quote:
Originally Posted by TriplecHamp View Post
in b4 30 responses to this painfully obvious troll.
not a troll. just an excited fan.

pats played great but defense KILLED them.
Fitz>Brady is offline  
Old 09-25-2011, 06:15 PM   #6
PatsFans.com Veteran
 
AndyJohnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18,759
Default Re: Wierdest part of 4-3 Defensive Philosophy

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonBlackmon55 View Post
Seems to be that the switch was made to 4-3 to become a more attacking Defense. However, despite that scheme change, combined with all the personnel moves, the "personality" of this defense remains unchanged - passive.
Huh? We are getting gashed by the run because we play 1 gap.
We are getting beaten in the air because we are playing man.
We are giving up more big plays than ever because of the aggressive style.
Do you not realize that aggressive defense is high risk and high reward? Why demand aggression and complain about the risk?

Quote:
There is no leadership on the field with this defense, anywhere. Just 11 guys running around like chickens with their heads cut off. Back then with Vrabel, Rodney, Bru, law, even if the team was not as talented "on paper" with the defensive stud athletes, they played smart and had mental toughness.
This isnt worth responding to, because its just something you made up. You have no clue what kind of leadership is happening. Good results mean there is leadership, bad results mean there are no leaders and they are mentally soft is a horrendous argument.

Quote:
Last few years of adding average players like TBC, Burgess, now pick your litter of others, combined with poor drafting has caught up. Rather than adding impact players to a good group of vets and make this Defense absolute terror, BB gambled away picks for more depth type average players like Butler, Brace, Spikes, Cunningham, Crable, McKenzie, Willhite, wheatley, merriwether......list is unending. Either they were busts or could not be coached up.
I don't understand your point. What did you want him to draft with his 2nd 3rd and 4th round picks, Hall of Famers?

Quote:
So, what we have left today is a Defense with no impact players,
Wilfork, Mayo, Haynesworth, and potentially Chung, McCourty and others are impact players. How do you not consider the leading tackler in the NFL or the best DT int eh NFL impact players?

Quote:
identity, or even a threat the other teams need to account for. A defense that has no key cogs to be able to play 3-4, or terrorize other Offenses with pass rushing 4-3 DT/DE's

Gonna be a looooooooong season.
We have the rest of the season to get this defense ready for the playoffs. This offense is 12-4 if it had the worst D in the league, and it won't


Quote:
They way Raiders are kicking Jesters around, Pats are in for one heck of a streetfight next week. and then.......Plaxico vs. McToasty, uuuggh
You are worried about Plaxico Burress? Should have read that first and ignored your post/
memento and Criptonite like this.
AndyJohnson is offline  
Old 09-25-2011, 06:29 PM   #7
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,642
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Wierdest part of 4-3 Defensive Philosophy

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonBlackmon55 View Post
Seems to be that the switch was made to 4-3 to become a more attacking Defense. However, despite that scheme change, combined with all the personnel moves, the "personality" of this defense remains unchanged - passive.

There is no leadership on the field with this defense, anywhere. Just 11 guys running around like chickens with their heads cut off. Back then with Vrabel, Rodney, Bru, law, even if the team was not as talented "on paper" with the defensive stud athletes, they played smart and had mental toughness.

Last few years of adding average players like TBC, Burgess, now pick your litter of others, combined with poor drafting has caught up. Rather than adding impact players to a good group of vets and make this Defense absolute terror, BB gambled away picks for more depth type average players like Butler, Brace, Spikes, Cunningham, Crable, McKenzie, Willhite, wheatley, merriwether......list is unending. Either they were busts or could not be coached up.

So, what we have left today is a Defense with no impact players, identity, or even a threat the other teams need to account for. A defense that has no key cogs to be able to play 3-4, or terrorize other Offenses with pass rushing 4-3 DT/DE's

Gonna be a looooooooong season.

They way Raiders are kicking Jesters around, Pats are in for one heck of a streetfight next week. and then.......Plaxico vs. McToasty, uuuggh
I find it amazing how you can just Spikes and Cunningham on less than 2 years experience.

Your judgement on Meriweather leaves a lot to be desired as well.

This idea that he "gambled away picks for more depth type average players" is laughable as well. Have they had players not work out? Yes. Any more than any other team? No. In fact, despite the 2007 draft, the Pats still are considered one of the better drafting teams.

There are no impact players on this defense? What do you call Wilfork, Chung, and Mayo? They are impact players, but they can't do it themselves.

People like you rush to judgement and overlook many factors that need to be considered. Such as injuries to other players. Going into the week, the Pats knew they'd probably be without Wright. But then losing Pryor to the IR and Haynesworth being ruled out puts a huge strain on a defensive line. In fact, I down any team could go wihtout 3 of their top 6 D-linemen and be truly successful. And then you add to that not having Chung and Dowling, two of your starting DBs, that's a lot for a defense to absorb in one week.

So, instead of running around and over-reacting, step back, take a breath, and take in everything that's happened. Not just the things you want to crucify Belichick on because you happened no to like them.
DaBruinz is offline  
Old 09-25-2011, 06:30 PM   #8
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 57
Default Re: Wierdest part of 4-3 Defensive Philosophy

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonBlackmon55 View Post
Seems to be that the switch was made to 4-3 to become a more attacking Defense. However, despite that scheme change, combined with all the personnel moves, the "personality" of this defense remains unchanged - passive.

There is no leadership on the field with this defense, anywhere. Just 11 guys running around like chickens with their heads cut off. Back then with Vrabel, Rodney, Bru, law, even if the team was not as talented "on paper" with the defensive stud athletes, they played smart and had mental toughness.

Last few years of adding average players like TBC, Burgess, now pick your litter of others, combined with poor drafting has caught up. Rather than adding impact players to a good group of vets and make this Defense absolute terror, BB gambled away picks for more depth type average players like Butler, Brace, Spikes, Cunningham, Crable, McKenzie, Willhite, wheatley, merriwether......list is unending. Either they were busts or could not be coached up.

So, what we have left today is a Defense with no impact players, identity, or even a threat the other teams need to account for. A defense that has no key cogs to be able to play 3-4, or terrorize other Offenses with pass rushing 4-3 DT/DE's

Gonna be a looooooooong season.

They way Raiders are kicking Jesters around, Pats are in for one heck of a streetfight next week. and then.......Plaxico vs. McToasty, uuuggh

Where is our MLBs? Mayo was supposed to be the one set loose on blitzes...where? Also, Tedy used to be constantly tipping passes and getting those key INT's. Has Mayo ever?
BlueHen is offline  
Old 09-25-2011, 06:46 PM   #9
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 416
Default Re: Wierdest part of 4-3 Defensive Philosophy

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueHen View Post
Where is our MLBs? Mayo was supposed to be the one set loose on blitzes...where? Also, Tedy used to be constantly tipping passes and getting those key INT's. Has Mayo ever?
Agreed. People highly overrate our individual players. If everyone was as good as advertised on here, we'd be the best defense in the league.

I'm almost giving up on Mayo becoming a game changer like Bruschi and many others. He's a solid tackler, but he's not making the Bruschi plays.

Chung -- I think he still has potential but there's a long way to go to call him an impact player. Rodney was an impact player. Chung is no Rodney (yet).

Spikes -- no idea why ppl think he's great.

McCourty -- I liked him alot last year. I was hoping he'd take the same kind of step Revis did from year 1 to 2. Unfortunately it hasn't happenned. Hopefully it will -- but right now our secondary is average at best.

Vince -- Solid player, but we lack playmakers on the ends (DL or LB)

Last edited by voluntarysaftey; 09-25-2011 at 06:47 PM..
voluntarysaftey is offline  
Old 09-26-2011, 08:00 AM   #10
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
satz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Attleboro,Ma
Posts: 1,909
Default Re: Wierdest part of 4-3 Defensive Philosophy

I think you believe too much of the player clippings. those teams where loaded. you just do not become Top 2-3 defense without great players.

rodney will say no one gave us a shot even in 04 lol.. he was funny . the No 1 defense has no shot?.

the DL was the strength , the LB were awesome and safeties where good.
i do not under your whole the players where not the best statement that the pats would project.

Its a personal issue right now. we do not have a bully dominant DL like seymour with vince inside create issues. with these 2 in there the OLB where matched up against TE and RB.Right now
they double vince and play everyone man up and our OLB are going against tackles.

I questioned the 4-3 from day one .... we should moved to a 3-4 attacking style not 4-3 with less personal. we do not have 1 great pass rusher and yesterday we learned that carter cannot play 3-4end AGAIN as he did not and is not a great 4-3end.
captain stone likes this.
__________________
NFL - A perfect american business model .
HarleyDavidson-Turning gas into noise for more than 100 yrs without the side effects of power and still making a tonne of money a great american business model.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by satz; 09-26-2011 at 08:03 AM..
satz is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Defensive philosophy livinginthe past PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 31 05-21-2009 07:09 PM
Prediction: BB adjusts defensive philosophy AndyJohnson PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 44 02-07-2008 08:59 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC