slash83

http://www.rotoworld.com/Content/home_NFL.aspx

signbabybrady

sign him up to a vet min.

seems to be the trend


P.S. anyone up for a 600 post thread about this

__________________

RayClay

For the record, that line is not in the Boston Globe article. Opinion of Mr. rotoworld, whoever he is.

__________________

RayClay

Not unless he can play linebacker. The legitimate concern about how the Patriots will turn over the aging linebacker corps led to that IMO.

Hopefully, Hobson is part of the answer.

__________________

LloydBraun

If his foot, and character, check out, he could be a very young and potentially good addition to the d-line. Perhaps we will see more of a 4-3 than usual ?

This team is loading up. Scott would provide tremendous depth up front. Seymour, Warren, Wright, Green, Scott and Thomas would be a nice group at DE, with each having the ability to play inside in certain schemes.

PonyExpress

D. Scott has been a very solid player in the NFL and this would be a good signing at minimum risk, (provided the foot is fine).

signbabybrady

funny thing is scott is prolly the better player

__________________

LloydBraun

It's still April, the draft is a week away. The FO will address the LB situation. But, remember, BB likes to have his sytem rely on smart, veteran LB's. Players like Hobson and a rookie pick allow the Pats to rely less on Seau and Bruschi on every down.

The "experts" fail to realize that while we lost Samuel and Gay (way over priced) to big deals, we have added Webster, Bryant and Hobson to low cost deals. These are quality veterans coming ina t low money deals. Plus, Samuel was a big loss, but Gay?????

Look for a Gholston, Rivers or Groves in rd. 1 of the draft with a MLB targetted on day 2. This team will have a quality unit on D by the time camp starts.

RussFrancis

This guy Scott looks like he'd fit more into the DE rotation. 290 is a little big for a 'backer.

PonyExpress

Scott would be a 3-4 DE, not a LB...