ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Anderson is very good at penetrating, Based on what I have seen he isn't as good against the run. That may change in subsequent games but that is what I saw.
Anderson is a LOCK it seems. Check my thread.
Does Jermaine really have the speed to be an OLB or can he be an effective DE? I don't think so, but I would like to keep Jermaine... it all depends how well he does in TC. He showed up a disappointment as Reis explained (I made that thread that went on forever). Richard is the better fit right now in present time. Cuningham is prolly going no where either based on what u said. Richard better make the team
Moore is imposing and I liked what I saw from him. Cunningham was less effective than Moore
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by TheSolderKing; 08-14-2011 at 06:35 PM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Jermaine has the higher potential over Anderson and moore... but look @ the Vernon Gholston's of the world that had the same if not better potential. What about Crable the FABLE to he had very high potential.
So how Cunningham will play in the NFL is based upon 2 guys you thought were supposed to be good who have done less in their entire careers than Cunningham did as a rookie without an exhibition season?
Quote:
I think Jermaine almost fits right into that category.]
Why? Because those are 2 names you could think of who failed, so he must be like them to fit your argument? He is nothing like those 2 guys.
Quote:
IDK yet, but I am playing for this year if he is gone he can be replaced next year w/ a round 1 stud just my 2 cents
Right, lets draft a guy in the 2nd round, have him start and play well as a rookie, then cut him in his second year to play a castoff so we can use a first round pick next year. Where do you get this stuff from?
Does Jermaine really have the speed to be an OLB or can he be an effective DE? I don't think so,
What in the world are you talking about.
Quote:
but I would like to keep Jermaine... it all depends how well he does in TC. He showed up a disappointment as Reis explained (I made that thread that went on forever). Richard is the better fit right now in present time. Cuningham is prolly going no where either based on what u said. Richard better make the team
They play different positions. Richard is a longshot to make the roster and be inactive every week.
Quote:
Moore is imposing and I liked what I saw from him. Cunningham was less effective than Moore
That pretty much answers the question of whether you have any football knowledge or not.
Does Jermaine really have the speed to be an OLB or can he be an effective DE? I don't think so, but I would like to keep Jermaine... it all depends how well he does in TC. He showed up a disappointment as Reis explained (I made that thread that went on forever). Richard is the better fit right now in present time. Cuningham is prolly going no where either based on what u said. Richard better make the team
Moore is imposing and I liked what I saw from him. Cunningham was less effective than Moore
Cunningham had a very good all around game against the Jags.
I think Anderson can be a significant player, but he is strictly a role player, Cunningham is the better all around LB as is Moore, based on what they showed on Fri against the Jack 1st O starters.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
So how Cunningham will play in the NFL is based upon 2 guys you thought were supposed to be good who have done less in their entire careers than Cunningham did as a rookie without an exhibition season?
Why? Because those are 2 names you could think of who failed, so he must be like them to fit your argument? He is nothing like those 2 guys.
Right, lets draft a guy in the 2nd round, have him start and play well as a rookie, then cut him in his second year to play a castoff so we can use a first round pick next year. Where do you get this stuff from?
I base it on potentials it is a mere comparison to 2 guys that failed w/ the same if not higher potential. I say carry the extra couple D guys over the Special Team gym heroes I like Cunningham it is tough to say what to do. Too bad we can't hide him, but he already practiced
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by TheSolderKing; 08-14-2011 at 06:41 PM..
Couldn't Anderson be starting, or at least playing the majority of the game at DE against passing teams without a strong running game? I think that's how he'll be used if he's as good a player as he played Thursday.
I think he weakness vs the run relegates him to sub packages.
Lets see him play against guys who will be on an NFL field this year before we project Thursday into real play.
I base it on potentials it is a mere comparison to 2 guys that failed w/ the same if not higher potential. I say carry the extra couple D guys over the Special Team gym heroes
So everyone who comes to the league with high expectations is going to fail because Gholston and Crable did?
If Vernon Gholston and Shawn Crable has become auto mechanics instead of football players they would have the same impact on Jermaine Cunninghams future, and on your argument.
PS can you please delete than annoying video tagline?
Does Jermaine really have the speed to be an OLB or can he be an effective DE? I don't think so, but I would like to keep Jermaine... it all depends how well he does in TC. He showed up a disappointment as Reis explained (I made that thread that went on forever). Richard is the better fit right now in present time. Cuningham is prolly going no where either based on what u said. Richard better make the team
Moore is imposing and I liked what I saw from him. Cunningham was less effective than Moore
Well my lying eyes said that Cunningham had a good night last Thurs. I hate to throw cold water on your thread or Mike Reiss, but that's what my eyes told me.
Also Cade Weston looked good, better than Love or Richard, but considering the competition, I won't say any of those make the team.
So everyone who comes to the league with high expectations is going to fail because Gholston and Crable did?
If Vernon Gholston and Shawn Crable has become auto mechanics instead of football players they would have the same impact on Jermaine Cunninghams future, and on your argument.
PS can you please delete than annoying video tagline?
Cunningham will stick. I am happy, but do not think he is that much of an upgrade compared to our situational guys. Jermaine won't bust like them... could he? perhaps. I just don't think JC is all that imposing and I hope I am wrong.
what tagline AJ? That is a movie not a VG Batman Begins was the movie if u refer to my sig?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Well my lying eyes said that Cunningham had a good night last Thurs. I hate to throw cold water on your thread or Mike Reiss, but that's what my eyes told me.
Also Cade Weston looked good, better than Love or Richard, but considering the competition, I won't say any of those make the team.
I thought Love played very well against the J'ville starters during the first qtr.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
7Likes
Re: Does Darryl Richard make the team ?
just my 2 cents
Linear Mode
