ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
What We have seen in the past few weeks is nothing but bad journalism.Whether it's Spygate,Asante to New Orleans,Randy Moss to Dallas.
You name it.It's all unnamed sources,No one "on the record" Mainstream Media quoting bloggers and fan internet sites.I have no problem with fans speculating,heck,that's what We do, but I have a big problem with journalists quoting our rambling as fact.It's time for journalists to let fans be fans and do a little leg work and dig out the truth.
Last edited by NoCal Patriot; 02-27-2008 at 07:59 AM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
The combine rumors of players signing with different teams is no big deal. That is a part of sports journalism in ever sport to write about trade or free agency signing rumors. I don't see that as bad journalism. It is just part of the sports game.
The spygate stuff, on the other hand, is bad journalism. You shouldn't be writing about allegations of a team cheating without being able to independently verify the information you are getting. When you write very damaging things about a team, you better be damn sure that you got it right.
The combine rumors of players signing with different teams is no big deal. That is a part of sports journalism in ever sport to write about trade or free agency signing rumors. I don't see that as bad journalism. It is just part of the sports game.
The spygate stuff, on the other hand, is bad journalism. You shouldn't be writing about allegations of a team cheating without being able to independently verify the information you are getting. When you write very damaging things about a team, you better be damn sure that you got it right.
Good Journalism would list them as rumors from very questionable sources.The Foxsports.com rumor of Randy Moss to Dallas was the Worst offender. It wasn't a rumor ,it was flat out just made up by the writer naming two entities that would get Him web hits,that being Randy Moss and The Dallas Cowboys, in the guise of a rumor.
Last edited by NoCal Patriot; 02-27-2008 at 08:52 AM..
Good Journalism would list them as rumors from very questionable sources.The Foxsports.com rumor of Randy Moss to Dallas was the Worst offender. It wasn't a rumor ,it was flat out just made up by the writer naming two entities that would get Him web hits,that being randy Moss and The Dallas Cowboys, in the guise of a rumor.
How do you know what John Czarnecki's sources was? How do you know they are very questionable sources? The guy is actually pretty connected in both the Patriots and Cowboys organizations. He might have gotten legitimate sources who said that the Pats and Moss aren't close to a deal and legitimate sources that the Cowboys would make a big push to get Moss if available.
I think you are way out of bounds accusing him of making it up. Why? Because it is a rumor you don't want to hear?
I am sure it is a legitimate rumor which Czarnecki specifically stated it was a rumor. It could be a bogus rumor, but he was specifically reporting rumors he heard at the combine.
How do we know who do we believe about Moss' contract? Maybe the rumor that Moss and the Pats have a deal done is the bogus rumor. I'm sorry, but just because you don't like the rumor doesn't mean that it isn't a legitimate rumor from a credible source. We won't know until at least Friday who is right.
How do you know what John Czarnecki's sources was? How do you know they are very questionable sources? The guy is actually pretty connected in both the Patriots and Cowboys organizations. He might have gotten legitimate sources who said that the Pats and Moss aren't close to a deal and legitimate sources that the Cowboys would make a big push to get Moss if available.
I think you are way out of bounds accusing him of making it up. Why? Because it is a rumor you don't want to hear?
I am sure it is a legitimate rumor which Czarnecki specifically stated it was a rumor. It could be a bogus rumor, but he was specifically reporting rumors he heard at the combine.
How do we know who do we believe about Moss' contract? Maybe the rumor that Moss and the Pats have a deal done is the bogus rumor. I'm sorry, but just because you don't like the rumor doesn't mean that it isn't a legitimate rumor from a credible source. We won't know until at least Friday who is right.
We won't know until Friday but I can wait until then.My skeptism of this story is very simple to trace.Read the story.There is not one"on the record" attribution form The Dallas Cowboys,The New England Patriots ,Randy Moss, or Randy Moss' Agent.
You're right I do not know the source of this rumor,for all I know it could have come from an Indianapolis Cab Driver or a Lunch Counter Waitress.To believe this rumor ,one has to assume that Bill Belichick and Scott Pioli have forgotten everything that they know about running a franchise.I simply don't think that way.
Perhaps You can live with unnamed sources,but if You do then We shall agree to disagree.If He had the story locked down,He would name his sources.
Last edited by NoCal Patriot; 02-27-2008 at 09:17 AM..
Um, is there any good journalism? Most of it nowadays is pathetic whether it is sports, politics or anything else...
Sure are plenty....Mike Reiss, Tom E. Curran , the late Alan Greenburg, up and coming Shalize Manza Young, Chris Gasper. Albert Breer (don't know how Boston let him get away), Charles Pierce, Patsfans own Christopher Price, Michael Holley, to name a few.
__________________
Season ticket holder since 1971, first in section 209 and now in 134.
LOVE New England sports....10 years SEVEN championships!!!
We won't know until Friday but I can wait until then.My skeptism of this story is very simple to trace.Read the story.There is not one"on the record" attribution form The Dallas Cowboys,The New England Patriots ,Randy Moss, or Randy Moss' Agent.
You're right I do not know the source of this rumor,for all I know it could have come from an Indianapolis Cab Driver or a Lunch Counter Waitress.To believe this rumor ,one has to assume that Bill Belichick and Scott Pioli have forgotten everything that they know about running a franchise.I simply don't think that way.
Perhaps You can live with unnamed sources,but if You do then We shall agree to disagree.If He had the story locked down,He would name his sources.
The guy is writing a column about rumors he heard at the combines. What are you expecting? "Scott Pioli told me that he heard that the negotionations between the Patriots and Randy Moss aren't close."
I'm sorry, the guy specifically positioned his column stating he was going to relay rumors he heard at the combine. I don't see problems with this. This is no different than hundreds of other reporters who went to the combines did this week. Or last year, or the year before, or the year before that. It is standard practice for journalists to relay rumors from the Combines.
I do have no problem with not having an unnamed source for this RUMOR because if he had a cited source it would not be a rumor anymore. If Czar had the story locked down, it wouldn't have been in a rumor piece but in a separate article.
From a pure journalism standpoint, writing about rumors is bad journalism. But when it comes to trades and free agent signings in sports, it has become an accepted practice in the sports journalism industry. It seems that every sports site has at least a section dedicated to rumors. ESPN has a "Rumor Central". SI has "Truths & Rumors". PFT is purely rumors. Every year we hear rumors of trades and free agent signings that have no source attributed to it.