Walsh's attorney: NFL's indemnification offer falls short - Page 5 - New England Patriots Forums

FirstAndGoal · 02-15-2008, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amber

What, a jurisdiction problem? I don't think so.

The entire basis for the case will be thrown out. No judge would hear the case. These cases are only filed to make a splash. You're a layperson so you're impressed with things like this. These types of cases are filed by the 100s and are thrown out.

I'll ask you, on what legal grounds would this case be heard? Don't make something up. I want to hear the real legal point and not something you make up.

TripleOption · 02-15-2008, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amber

Your welcome.

The one thing that is very clear, to me at least, is that Walsh is for real.

All he had to do was deny he had anything and destroy whatever he had so he did not get swept up in a big, ugly story. He's never denied a thing, nothing.

I don't know what type of receptors the Patriots' legal counsel has, but I suspect they picked up on this as well.

Then how would he get his payday and his book deal, moron?

You are one in a group of exactly one people in the US that think "Walsh is for real."

His lawyer, Specter, whoever...all know that he is full of *****.

He is holding out for immunity from perjury. You can bet that if he lies, Kraft will sue him into the stone age and press for criminal charges.

He'll never get that kind of deal.

***blackglass3*** · 02-15-2008, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FirstAndGoal

I read the lawsuit as I've read many, but you clearly don't understand law. It would take too long to explain why this would never hold up in court but keep on playing *****house lawyer. Maybe I can perform your next surgery. I watched ER when I was younger so I figure my medical knowledge is on par with your legal expertise.

If you go to jail for performing surgery when you can't, give me a call. I watch Prison Break, hence I can break out of prison with you.

Bella*chick · 02-15-2008, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amber

Your welcome.

The one thing that is very clear, to me at least, is that Walsh is for real.

All he had to do was deny he had anything and destroy whatever he had so he did not get swept up in a big, ugly story. He's never denied a thing, nothing.

I don't know what type of receptors the Patriots' legal counsel has, but I suspect they picked up on this as well.

Oh, its clear to you, is it? Walsh couldn't possibly want 15 minutes in the limelight. No, not according to Miss Pittsburgh, USA. He wouldn't want to be part of a big, ugly story, nosireeee.

Why would he deny a thing....he wants to be the center of attention.

And yes, I suspect I know way, way more than you about a lot of things in life.

***reflexblue*** · 02-15-2008, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by khayos

Wow, when Pittsburgh starts exporting its trash, this country must really be in a tough spot!

HAHAHAHA, that was good. I think thats a classic.

TripleOption · 02-15-2008, 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FirstAndGoal

The entire basis for the case will be thrown out. No judge would hear the case. These cases are only filed to make a splash. You're a layperson so you're impressed with things like this. These types of cases are filed by the 100s and are thrown out.

I'll ask you, on what legal grounds would this case be heard? Don't make something up. I want to hear the real legal point and not something you make up.

I'm not a big fan of Lawyers, but I work closely with a few and man do I love them.

If they're MY Lawyers, they're A-OK. March on, counselor.

Evil Tom · 02-15-2008, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrperrino

so there will be no protection for an interview/hearing/independent investigation.....once he has ILLEGAL evidence ILLEGAL PROPERTY from the PATS, he's toast......thus he lands in jail for possession of stolen property, distribution and theft, etc...and we all know MATT does NOT want to land in Federal Jail...

Even if he has stolen property in the form of videotapes and is found guilty of stealing this property from the Patriots the probability of him going to jail for it approaches 0.

It's much more likely he has nothing and is just making noise because he's bitter about being fired (for cause) by the Patriots. If he had the goods he'd have sold his story by now.

People have known about this guy from the start and even a complete tool like Easterbrook wasn't willing to go with his story due to lack of credibility.

***PatsFanJess*** · 02-15-2008, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amber

Your welcome.

The one thing that is very clear, to me at least, is that Walsh is for real.

All he had to do was deny he had anything and destroy whatever he had so he did not get swept up in a big, ugly story. He's never denied a thing, nothing.

I don't know what type of receptors the Patriots' legal counsel has, but I suspect they picked up on this as well.

Gimme a break...not get "swept" up in it? this whole matt walsh crap came out the DAY BEFORE the superbowl...HE WANTS TO GET SWEPT UP IT. he must have CALLED the reporters! he wants to get paid. i didnt hear anything about matt walsh from september all the way through the day bf the superbowl. cmon. the lawsuit is pathetic. and laughable.

FirstAndGoal · 02-15-2008, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amber

Contract fraud is not a proper basis for a civil lawsuit? Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Try to get more sleep.

That's the funny thing about the law. You have to prove fraud.

Nice comeback. It's clear that I'm speaking with one of the brighter legal minds in the country.

***reflexblue*** · 02-15-2008, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatsFanJess

Gimme a break...not get "swept" up in it? this whole matt walsh crap came out the DAY BEFORE the superbowl...HE WANTS TO GET SWEPT UP IT. he must have CALLED the reporters! he wants to get paid. i didnt hear anything about matt walsh from september all the way through the day bf the superbowl. cmon. the lawsuit is pathetic. and laughable.

Hey yu're dealing with someone who gets their information from the Enquirer.