Will the Pats stand pat at wide receiver? - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree61Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-23-2011, 02:12 PM   #21
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsWickedPissah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Hampster!
Posts: 19,369
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Will the Pats stand pat at wide receiver?

BB always tries to improve the team. Creating competition is one way. He'll add a WR should an FA be available at a relative "value" price, otherwise not. And that only after he's used up some cap space to address most important needs in his priority tree. So at this juncture the answer is unpredictable, even for BB.
patriot lifer likes this.
__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH
PatsWickedPissah is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 07-23-2011, 02:15 PM   #22
Brady to Dobson
 
Brady_to_Moss's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Blackjack table at Foxwoods
Posts: 11,881
My Mood: Cool
Send a message via AIM to Brady_to_Moss
Default Re: Will the Pats stand pat at wide receiver?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGodInAGreyHoodie View Post
@ Brady to Moss you need a new user handle.
Hell no..this name is staying
ctpatsfan77 likes this.
Brady_to_Moss is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 02:43 PM   #23
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 599
Default Re: Will the Pats stand pat at wide receiver?

Chad Ochocino Says Playing for Patriots Would Make Him 'Happiest Player in the World' - New England Patriots - NESN.com

So tempting. If BB has any interest at all I don't think we would have problems getting him.
NSPF is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 02:44 PM   #24
In the Starting Line-up
 
TommyBrady12's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I wish it were Boston
Posts: 2,688
My Mood: Confused
Default Re: Will the Pats stand pat at wide receiver?

if the patriots want to make a change at WR, they should sign sidney rice. he's only 25 yrs old and can become brady's number 1 target for the next 6-7 yrs. santana moss and randy moss are old at this point. of course, sidney is going to cost a lot of $.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"He’s the greatest quarterback to ever play the game. He goes from being a rookie that nobody is expecting anything from, to taking over with people saying he can’t do it, to winning three Super Bowls....It should already be obvious he’s the greatest quarterback to ever have played. "

- Steelers S Troy Polamalu on Tom Brady
TommyBrady12 is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 02:53 PM   #25
In the Starting Line-up
 
Snake Eyes's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,372
Default Re: Will the Pats stand pat at wide receiver?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bravo777 View Post
They went 14 - 2 last year with the same WRs that they have now. Maybe they will be just fine for this year
Will it be enough to get past the Jets in the playoffs? That's really the only relevant question.
__________________
"The secret of steel has always carried with it a mystery, you must learn it's riddle, Conan, you must learn its discipline, for no one in this world can you trust, not men, not women, not beasts...this you can trust"


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Snake Eyes is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 03:58 PM   #26
In the Starting Line-up
 
TommyBrady12's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I wish it were Boston
Posts: 2,688
My Mood: Confused
Default Re: Will the Pats stand pat at wide receiver?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Eyes View Post
Will it be enough to get past the Jets in the playoffs? That's really the only relevant question.
i don't think it's wise to make personnel moves based on one opponent. the pats beat the jets last year in the second game, after all. if anything, aaron hernandez' injury was the reason why the pats offense couldn't do anything against the jets. he was big in the December game when the pats routed them. gronkowski didn't play well in the playoffs and crumpler was awful in the passing department, so the pats really weren't getting any tight end help that game. that left cromartie and revis to shut down welker and branch. when hernandez and gronkowski play well, the pats are almost impossible to stop on offense.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"He’s the greatest quarterback to ever play the game. He goes from being a rookie that nobody is expecting anything from, to taking over with people saying he can’t do it, to winning three Super Bowls....It should already be obvious he’s the greatest quarterback to ever have played. "

- Steelers S Troy Polamalu on Tom Brady
TommyBrady12 is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 04:02 PM   #27
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 351
Default Re: Will the Pats stand pat at wide receiver?

Both Tate and Price have shown flashes, but not consistency. If we had a full length camp, I would have expected a vet signing to push the two of them and Branch as well.

I would rather see cap space spent on Mankins and another solid DB.
Jared is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 04:15 PM   #28
In the Starting Line-up
 
TheSolderKing's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,339
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Will the Pats stand pat at wide receiver?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Eyes View Post
Edelman has better numbers is the 3 cone and short shuttle drills, which would lead me to believe that he has better quickness than Welker, he also has better straight-line speed, he actually has better numbers all over the place.

Julian Edelman*|*Kent State,*WR*:*2009 NFL Draft Scout Player Profile

NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS, Wes Welker , Julian Edelman, Randy Moss, 40 YARD DASH TIMES

What I think your eyes are interpreting as quickness are the better angles and shifts that Welker makes, which allows him to evade defenders. Knowing how and where to move can be just as if not more important than the ability to move.

I believe Edelman can gain a better understanding of field geometry with more playing time and dedicated practice with TFB, it's possible that he even surpasses Welker in terms of playmaking ability.

Regarding a big-time WR and our SB rings, I don't think that's a sound argument, keep in mind we had a lights out defense during those years and more experience in the skill positions. Many of our WRs and RBs are relatively young, and the O-line will have a green rookie in Solder, these moving parts are more likely to make mistakes and put our aging HoF QB in danger, having a Larry Fitzgerald/Andre Johnson on the field can make things a lot easier on your offense.

I'm not suggesting we grab a big-name WR because 'everyone knows you need a big name WR to win" but rather I'd like a WR whose ability creates a lot of impact on the team. A guy who can work the outside and deep zones would make things tougher on opposing defenses, a guy that can box out a DB and go up and make the grab would help out a lot, the deep ball is one of the weakest parts of TFB's game, a receiver that can compensate for that would definitely make a difference.


welker just looks quicker to me in the first 5-12 yards. Edelman I knew he was superior at straight line running. Welker does evade more tackles and finds better holes so you r right w/ that. I like them bot very much
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by TheSolderKing; 07-23-2011 at 04:17 PM..
TheSolderKing is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 04:48 PM   #29
Banned
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,930
My Mood: Daring
Default Re: Will the Pats stand pat at wide receiver?

My guess is they just bring a couple of UDFA receivers for the hell of it, maybe some veteran JAG competition. I don't think they really need a big receiver like a lot of the media guys are claiming. They already have that in Gronkowski. The receiving core might not be the sexiest, but when you factor in the TEs and pass catchers at running back not many other teams stack up.
TheSolderKing likes this.

Last edited by sbpatfan; 07-23-2011 at 04:49 PM..
sbpatfan is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 05:13 PM   #30
In the Starting Line-up
 
Snake Eyes's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,372
Default Re: Will the Pats stand pat at wide receiver?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TommyBrady12 View Post
i don't think it's wise to make personnel moves based on one opponent. the pats beat the jets last year in the second game, after all. if anything, aaron hernandez' injury was the reason why the pats offense couldn't do anything against the jets. he was big in the December game when the pats routed them. gronkowski didn't play well in the playoffs and crumpler was awful in the passing department, so the pats really weren't getting any tight end help that game. that left cromartie and revis to shut down welker and branch. when hernandez and gronkowski play well, the pats are almost impossible to stop on offense.
If you're very likely to face that specific opponent on your way to a championship it's a wise move, the for Steve Young and the 49ers it was all about beating the Dallas Cowboys if they were to have any hope of a championship.

That being said, even if we discount a particular opponent we shouldnt discount a particular gameplan: do we have the ability to surpass that gameplan from other opponents?

I really want Fitzgerald and think he could take this offense to unreal levels, next offseason we have a legitimate shot at getting him, I wouldnt want to force things and go for Vincent Jackson, who is a bit too risky/pricey for my tastes but I might be persuaded to take a shot at a Malcolm Floyd for a year as a stop-gap with the potential to be more long term depending on how he does.
TheSolderKing likes this.
__________________
"The secret of steel has always carried with it a mystery, you must learn it's riddle, Conan, you must learn its discipline, for no one in this world can you trust, not men, not women, not beasts...this you can trust"


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Snake Eyes is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wide Receiver reamer Patriots Draft Talk 7 12-13-2010 07:18 PM
Wide Receiver jmt57 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 88 09-03-2010 12:09 PM
Pats sign safety/wide receiver Roderick Rogers pats1 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 30 08-19-2009 10:33 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC