MoLewisrocks

These do not include RFA tenders (we have BJGE at $1.9M I believe but tender numbers may change if other numbers reportedly are like raising minimum salaries). Obviously Rookie contracts are not yet included pending they actually sign something and replace those currently counting against the cap. They are based on the reported $120M cap and don't account for use of the reported lone $3M exemption in 2011. 7 teams are reportedly over the $120M cap.

Reggie Bush among potential cap casualties - ESPN

Rob0729

Well, now they are saying there may be a soft cap for the next few years. I guess being under the cap might not mean much.

NEGoldenAge

Clayton is a moron and a dbag. Anything he writes is almost garunteed to be agenda driven and inaccurate.

mgteich

I suspect that the cap floor will have a very large effect on free agency. While there is no match, the ream so far under are likely to also to have cash floor issues.

There is lots to spend for those $10M or more under the cap. 20 teams are more than $10M under for a total of over $500M. They will be bidding up the cost of free agents.

The rest of the teams seem in normal cap shape (1 team $18.9M over and final 11 a total of $18M over).

HomerSchooled

Awesome. I've been waiting for a more up to date view of all the team's situations. Good to see Indy and the Jets over. Hopefully it actually means something.

37Harrison

How in the F is Washington under the cap???? And by that much?!?!?!

__________________
S.H.E.S.

MoLewisrocks

I think that may be some misinterpretation spin dating back to LaCanfora's feels like spin. For a while the league pondered letting teams carry forward their unused cap from 2009. But Clayton said that met with too much disapproval so was scuttled. Then there have always been those who hoped/insisted dead cap would die with the old CBA. No indication that has ever been discussed. I think people are making too much out of spin which is already underway pending the votes.

The $3M exemption may be the means to keeping high priced vets. Nothing a cap does will keep the underperforming ones...at least on the well managed teams. If they are raising minimum salaries they may be raising the formula for veteran minimum deals - if they in fact still exist. That formula was always tough for vets to swallow because it so severely limited what they could be paid. Clayton says the $3M 2011 exemption becomes 3 $1.5M exemptions in 2012. That may be all there is to this sense that veterans will be protected (as opposed to an actual soft cap which I think the have nots would have really squawked about for competitive purposes). That may replace veteran minimum deals for cap purposes.

7 teams are currently over the cap. And frankly, that's not all that unusual a circumstance before the new league year begins. And there used to be more of that before the cap imploded. If owners went through all of this to lower player costs, I can't see them adopting a deal that would potentially undercut that goal. Some of the people forwarding that premise are also conspiracy theorists who think this is all part of a plan Jerry and Robert hatched because they would secretly love a $140M that drove several of the have nots out of the league...

patriot lifer

I'm a little surprised the Jets are over. Despite the new deals I thought that GM would have been a bit more cautious. I guess the first order of business for them is making sure Harris isn't being paid $10 million.

I don't know how reliable his data is but I'm sure it's not far off.

__________________
2013 Season:

Nate Solder (6'8" 320 lbs)
Seabass (6'8" 320 lbs)
Rob Gronkowski (6'6" 265 lbs)
Jake Ballard (6'6" 275 lbs)
Logan Mankins (6'4" 320 lbs) (100% recovered)
Dan Connolly (6'4" 320 lbs)
Marcus Cannon (6'5" 340 lbs) (Switch to Guard??)

RB: Ridley, Vereen, Washington, Bolden

PatsWickedPissah

Without RFA tender money and number of players from the club's 2010 53 included it's hard to see what over or under really means. We do know that the Pats have probably more of their 53 signed and included in the amount stated than many.

__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH

sbpatfan

Pittsburgh is 10 over, does that include Woodley?