ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Re: Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Scrizz
The best part of the whole Jets fiasco is that they have a bottom 10 QB with a 17M + cap hit.
Granted it will be fairly easy to shed a good junk of that this season because so much is salary but the Jets are in a tough position. They can save cap cutting a few guys, restructure Sanchize, and sign Harris long-term.
But as Andy correctly notes, they have about half a team right now. They can either try to build some depth with actual NFL caliber players or put all of their eggs in a few baskets like Holmes and Cro.
I don't see how they can come out of this even as good as they were last year. And they have been remarkably lucky injury-wise lately too which is how they get by with zero depth.
In the end I think all of those other teams with a ton of cap room will make their decision for them and drive up the prices on Holmes and Cromartie. I see them resigning Edwards. They can have him.
Really, having them extend Sanchez or just convert his salary to signing bonus is good for the Patriots. They increase their future commitment to him which means they are stuck with him, and they are in such awful cap shape (as much because of all the holes they have to fill as the lack of space they have) that freeing it up for this year wont be close to enough to solve the problems.
As the cap noose tightens and the commitment to Sanchez increases, the fate of the team becomes more and more in Sanchez hands, which will go a long way toward eliminating them from contention for anything.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
__________________
My youngest sister's best friend is on the board of directors of a food pantry in Malden, Massachusetts that distributed 285,000 meals and meal equivalents in 2005. I am asking that if you have found my salary cap pages useful that if you are able to do so, please make a donation to it. Please contact me for more information.
Re: Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams
Anyway, to expand on my initial question of who-might-go-where, I think Chicago just became my favorite to win the Asomugha auction. With tons of cap space in a huge market, no great corners outside of Charles Tillman, and a desperation to outshine Green Bay, it looks to me like a match made in heaven.
Re: Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomerSchooled
Anyway, to expand on my initial question of who-might-go-where, I think Chicago just became my favorite to win the Asomugha auction. With tons of cap space in a huge market, no great corners outside of Charles Tillman, and a desperation to outshine Green Bay, it looks to me like a match made in heaven.
Cap space is only half the equation. The number, and quality of players under contract is the other half.
If Mankins, Brady, Wilfork and Mayo were unsigned, the Pats would have over 40 mill of cap space and appear to be a team that would be a major FA player.
Re: Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson
Cap space is only half the equation. The number, and quality of players under contract is the other half.
If Mankins, Brady, Wilfork and Mayo were unsigned, the Pats would have over 40 mill of cap space and appear to be a team that would be a major FA player.
Totally agree, and I had factored that into my thinking. I just failed to mention it. My bad. The Bears only have a couple of their own FAs they'd care to resign, and none would really break. That being said, they may have greater needs than corner. I just feel like they'll want to make a splash.
Re: Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams
Dallas 18.9m over the cap!
Well someone had to say it -- Demarcus Ware come on down to New England!! ^_^
Hahaha, we can dream right?
BTW did anyone know that Miles Austin made 17m in 2010? That was even more than Romo and Ware combined! I'm thinking most of this must have been signing bonus. http://www.sportscity.com/NFL/Dallas-Cowboys-Salaries
__________________
Pats NEW LOOK Offense
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Weapons Galore!
Last edited by VJCPatriot; 07-22-2011 at 08:51 AM..
Re: Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson
90% does not mean 90% every year. There is some type of 3 year average. I think any team can be as far under 90% as they want this year and have 2 years to make up the difference.
Well, yes and no... they still can't exceed the cap in subsequent years, so they can't be SO far under the floor this year that they can't mathematically make it up. For example, if the cap is $120m and the floor is $100m (or $300m over 3 years for hypotheticals), they will need to spend at LEAST $60m this year, or even right at the cap they'll fall short of the floor.
Re: Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sicilian
Well, yes and no... they still can't exceed the cap in subsequent years, so they can't be SO far under the floor this year that they can't mathematically make it up. For example, if the cap is $120m and the floor is $100m (or $300m over 3 years for hypotheticals), they will need to spend at LEAST $60m this year, or even right at the cap they'll fall short of the floor.
The numbers for the cap floor that I've heard are 99% for 2011 and 95% for 2012 onwards. Correct me if I'm wrong.
__________________
Pats NEW LOOK Offense
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.