Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree3Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-21-2011, 11:31 AM   #11
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Rob0729's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 25,487
Default Re: Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by sbpatfan View Post
Pittsburgh is 10 over, does that include Woodley?
Yes. Franchise tag numbers still count against the cap and he actually signed his tender. So technically, he is no longer a franchised player, but a player under contract.
Rob0729 is online now  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 07-21-2011, 11:48 AM   #12
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 236
Default Re: Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams

So who are going to be the big winners in FA this season? Looks like Chicago is poised to spend big again, and they'll probably want to grab a bit of the spotlight back from Green Bay. Tampa and KC may be appealing to free agents as teams on the rise with plenty of cash to spend. I keep hearing Philly's itching to make a move. St. Louis could be a draw for one of the big receivers. Any guesses on who may head where?

Here's my shot in the dark: Santonio Holmes goes elsewhere and takes the big money that the Jets can't give him. Considering all the maneuvering the Jets already did before the lockout, it's hard to believe they'll be able to manage market value for any of their bigger free agents. I think that means Holmes and Cromartie walk, and to save face the Jets manage to resign one or a couple of Edwards, Ellis, or Pool.

Last edited by HomerSchooled; 07-21-2011 at 11:48 AM..
HomerSchooled is offline  
Old 07-21-2011, 11:53 AM   #13
In the Starting Line-up
 
BlueThunder's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Onset, Mass
Posts: 2,820
My Mood: Inspired
Default Re: Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by HomerSchooled View Post
Here's my shot in the dark: Santonio Holmes goes elsewhere and takes the big money that the Jets can't give him. Considering all the maneuvering the Jets already did before the lockout, it's hard to believe they'll be able to manage market value for any of their bigger free agents. I think that means Holmes and Cromartie walk, and to save face the Jets manage to resign one or a couple of Edwards, Ellis, or Pool.
That sounds about right...but certain Jet fans think that their Gang Green is going to be ok and Tangenius will pull a rabbit out of the hat.....

Will be fun watching them scramble to field as effective a team as they had last season....
__________________
My guns are no threat to anyone who isn't trying to deprive me or my family of life,liberty or property. They are,however, EXTREMELY dangerous to anyone who threatens to take those things.
BlueThunder is offline  
Old 07-21-2011, 12:07 PM   #14
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default Re: Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by 37Harrison View Post
How in the F is Washington under the cap???? And by that much?!?!?!
They had been working on cleaning up their cap position for a couple of seasons and they took full advantage of what they could do last season in absorbing all of Haynesworth's $21M option in the uncapped season. They can now cut him if they want to and save more. The cap is a little like life, takes money to make money (or cap room).
MoLewisrocks is offline  
Old 07-21-2011, 12:16 PM   #15
In the Starting Line-up
 
BlueThunder's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Onset, Mass
Posts: 2,820
My Mood: Inspired
Default Re: Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams

There are a few teams that can sign just about anyone they go after...

HOW did Tampa get that much under ??????
__________________
My guns are no threat to anyone who isn't trying to deprive me or my family of life,liberty or property. They are,however, EXTREMELY dangerous to anyone who threatens to take those things.

Last edited by BlueThunder; 07-21-2011 at 12:16 PM..
BlueThunder is offline  
Old 07-21-2011, 12:17 PM   #16
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 236
Default Re: Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueThunder View Post
That sounds about right...but certain Jet fans think that their Gang Green is going to be ok and Tangenius will pull a rabbit out of the hat.....

Will be fun watching them scramble to field as effective a team as they had last season....
Honestly, it's hard to see how they resign anyone given they already trimmed their obvious fat (Woody, Jenkins, Taylor, Gholston). Signing Harris long term may free up a couple million, but not enough to pay ANY of their free agents a starter's salary.

I'm not an expert, and I'm actually expecting them to pull a rabbit out of their hat in some way. As far as I can tell, they can't sign anyone, so I'm guessing they'll manage to resign a couple players. But Holmes and Cromartie could each pull as much as or maybe even more than 8 million a year on the open market, and it's hard to believe there's anything the Jets could do to keep those two around.
HomerSchooled is offline  
Old 07-21-2011, 12:21 PM   #17
In the Starting Line-up
 
BlueThunder's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Onset, Mass
Posts: 2,820
My Mood: Inspired
Default Re: Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams

I forgot about them losing JT.....he wasn't spectacular, but was a solid player for them....vets like that are tough to replace...
__________________
My guns are no threat to anyone who isn't trying to deprive me or my family of life,liberty or property. They are,however, EXTREMELY dangerous to anyone who threatens to take those things.
BlueThunder is offline  
Old 07-21-2011, 12:24 PM   #18
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsWickedPissah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Hampster!
Posts: 19,526
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueThunder View Post
There are a few teams that can sign just about anyone they go after...

HOW did Tampa get that much under ??????
Tamper is cheap. They're a prima facie example why the NFLPA* (justifiably in my view) want a high salary floor. Tamper signed lots of young players. Got a blind squirrel hit the QB lottery and drafted some good players. But despite contending for a playoff spot into December, they couldn't fill the stadium and had weekly blackouts.
__________________
RIP Vince Flynn. Condolences to family and friends.
PatsWickedPissah is offline  
Old 07-21-2011, 12:53 PM   #19
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
BradyFTW!'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 13,842
My Mood: Doh
Default Re: Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by HomerSchooled View Post
Honestly, it's hard to see how they resign anyone given they already trimmed their obvious fat (Woody, Jenkins, Taylor, Gholston). Signing Harris long term may free up a couple million, but not enough to pay ANY of their free agents a starter's salary.

I'm not an expert, and I'm actually expecting them to pull a rabbit out of their hat in some way. As far as I can tell, they can't sign anyone, so I'm guessing they'll manage to resign a couple players. But Holmes and Cromartie could each pull as much as or maybe even more than 8 million a year on the open market, and it's hard to believe there's anything the Jets could do to keep those two around.
From what I've seen, the Jets will probably have to sign Harris long term, restructure Sanchez, and cut Bryan Thomas if they want to make significant headway with the cap.
BradyFTW! is offline  
Old 07-21-2011, 01:22 PM   #20
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 236
Default Re: Clayton posts preliminary cap projections for all 32 teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyFTW! View Post
From what I've seen, the Jets will probably have to sign Harris long term, restructure Sanchez, and cut Bryan Thomas if they want to make significant headway with the cap.
Cutting Bryan Thomas seems nuts to me. He's arguably got the friendliest contract on the team. He lead the team in sacks, and he's only making 3.7 million for the year. Given that many thought they had troubles rushing the passer last season, they've got no upcoming youth behind him, and their 3rd and 4th team leaders in sacks are already FAs, I doubt they could put his cap value to any better use. Tomlinson seems like a feasible cut at 3.1 million, but he was their leading rusher last year, and nobody behind him really lived up to expectations. The point is, there's no one they could cut without obviously harming the team.

Restructuring Sanchez and signing Harris long term seems the obvious answer, but that can only go so far. Harris will be looking for at least 8 million a year, and given that his fellow (and certainly inferior) ILB Bart Scott is already making that, he may even end up closer to 9 million a year. They'll likely only be able to save 1-2 million off the franchise tag with him. As for restructuring Sanchez, I haven't a clue. Tons of QBs have done it in the past, and it's not like Sanchez is going to give up any money. What's the history for these sorts of deals? What's usually gained?
HomerSchooled is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Preliminary Mock Draft kas Patriots Draft Talk 28 01-02-2009 02:15 PM
Preliminary Draft Order pats1 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 3 01-01-2007 02:34 PM
Who I like in the draft (preliminary) DaBruinz Patriots Draft Talk 22 01-25-2006 03:06 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566