The Offense Could Be Even Better With 2 Smurfs. - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-2008, 10:48 AM   #1
----> Iron Mod <----
 
IcyPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 31,494
Default The Offense Could Be Even Better With 2 Smurfs.

I was comparing the offense this year to Brady's smurfs whom helped earn us 3 SB victories. I'm thinking Belichick will expand upon what he learned this year in 2 ways.

1: It will be hard to find another Welker but Belichick will look for a Welker clone in the draft. If we keep Randy Moss I think his value to the team is even greater if we surround him with 2 smurfs instead of 1. A way to keep the safety from rolling over the top is to make him respect the over the middle catches designed with the intention of greater YAC.

2: Faulk has a few years left with the team. However, I see Belichick expanding Faulks role next year and also drafting another pass receiving small scatback type of RB in this years draft. Faulk going short along with 2 slot-type WR's instead of 1 will negate heavy pass rushes and give Brady more time to throw even more balls to Moss.

If Belichick does indeed go this route I see Brady and Moss eclipsing the records they set this year. Adding an improved Maroney to that attack like we saw at years end and I think we will absolutely see the greatest offense ever.

I don't want to say Belichick made any mistakes this year. I'm saying he will see where we were exploited and he sill stick a dagger in it. If he can find a kid that can be 75% of what Welker is then he'll have found that weapon. So say good bye to Stallworth as Gaffney takes over by himself the role of the mid-range YAC reciever to complement Moss and the 2 smurfs.
IcyPatriot is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-07-2008, 10:51 AM   #2
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
Watson's IQ's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 1,574
Default Re: The Offense Could Be Even Better With 2 Smurfs.

I'm pretty sure Faulk is used pretty consistently as the 2nd smurf. I actually like the mix of talent at WR we had this year. Moss speaks for himself, Stallworth is a great YAC guy, and Welker catches everything. I think it was a winning formula and I'd be shocked if they didn't try to follow it as closely as possible next season.
__________________
“I'm tired of hearing about money, money, money, money, money. I just want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok…”
-Shaquille O'Neal
Watson's IQ is offline  
Old 02-07-2008, 10:54 AM   #3
In the Starting Line-up
 
oldskool138's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,558
My Mood: Goofy
Default Re: The Offense Could Be Even Better With 2 Smurfs.

It smurfin' sucked that the Pats lost the smurfin' Super Bowl. They should have smurfed all over the smurfin' Giants. The played the game like they didn't give a smurf. Smurf!

__________________
You can't be two feet tall and expect to take over the world...unless you're Doug Flutie. -MST3K
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"You're all a bunch yahoos, hero worshipers and gutless suck-ups." - Tony Massarotti
oldskool138 is offline  
Old 02-07-2008, 11:07 AM   #4
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
fumbrunner's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lurking in the Great White North
Posts: 1,681
My Mood: Lurking
Default Re: The Offense Could Be Even Better With 2 Smurfs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Watson's IQ View Post
I'm pretty sure Faulk is used pretty consistently as the 2nd smurf. I actually like the mix of talent at WR we had this year. Moss speaks for himself, Stallworth is a great YAC guy, and Welker catches everything. I think it was a winning formula and I'd be shocked if they didn't try to follow it as closely as possible next season.
It will be tough to improve on what was accomplished this year on offense. It's clear that teams cannot stop Faulk and Welker. Gaffney is a good receiver is multiple receiver sets. The one area of concern is the double-teaming of Moss. That part of the "blueprint" seemed to have worked. The only way to get away from that is to have another legitimate deep threat on the other side. I don't think Stallworth is that and I think he is good as gone.

However, I was very very impressed with Kelly Washington's work ethic on STs. If that translates on offense, he may become the tall downfield receiver opposite Moss that teams will have to respect.
fumbrunner is offline  
Old 02-07-2008, 11:26 AM   #5
----> Iron Mod <----
 
IcyPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 31,494
Default Re: The Offense Could Be Even Better With 2 Smurfs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fumbrunner View Post
It will be tough to improve on what was accomplished this year on offense. It's clear that teams cannot stop Faulk and Welker. Gaffney is a good receiver is multiple receiver sets. The one area of concern is the double-teaming of Moss. That part of the "blueprint" seemed to have worked. The only way to get away from that is to have another legitimate deep threat on the other side. .
How is another deep threat going to contain a brutal pass rush? You could have 3 deep threats and still the pass rush will get to you before you can throw the pass...tossing it early is not an option ... A competant FS can cover alot of ground playing center field and running under the throw after it is thrown deep.

I think the short throws as used as a running attack will be enhanced by more and more teams ... especially teams with weaker QB's. The athletic ability of DL's to rush the passer gets better after every draft ... they will get quicker and not slower. The short pass game is the best way to slow the attack.
IcyPatriot is offline  
Old 02-07-2008, 11:30 AM   #6
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Tunescribe's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 12,754
My Mood: Brooding
Send a message via AIM to Tunescribe
Default Re: The Offense Could Be Even Better With 2 Smurfs.

Bam Childress is a smurf, maybe he could help out.
Tunescribe is offline  
Old 02-07-2008, 11:33 AM   #7
----> Iron Mod <----
 
IcyPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 31,494
Default Re: The Offense Could Be Even Better With 2 Smurfs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tunescribe View Post
Bam Childress is a smurf, maybe he could help out.
He's not good enough ... he can't get past the jam.
IcyPatriot is offline  
Old 02-07-2008, 11:57 AM   #8
All Pro Poster
 
upstater1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,794
Default Re: The Offense Could Be Even Better With 2 Smurfs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fumbrunner View Post
It will be tough to improve on what was accomplished this year on offense. It's clear that teams cannot stop Faulk and Welker. Gaffney is a good receiver is multiple receiver sets. The one area of concern is the double-teaming of Moss. That part of the "blueprint" seemed to have worked. The only way to get away from that is to have another legitimate deep threat on the other side. I don't think Stallworth is that and I think he is good as gone.

However, I was very very impressed with Kelly Washington's work ethic on STs. If that translates on offense, he may become the tall downfield receiver opposite Moss that teams will have to respect.
This is exactly my thinking. The only benefit of having Moss in a tight game is that the other receiver roams free. Look at the Colts, look at the Rams.

Stallworth wasn't cutting it.

Troy Brown and Deion Branch were masters of finding a soft spot over the middle for a key 20 yard reception.

We never had that at ALL this year. Welker catches the ball 8 yards downfield. Stallworth barely caught it. Only Moss went over the middle that far downfield, but Moss is a bit gangly and he has to turtle because of his size.

As ever, we could really use a Deion Branch/Troy Brown type.
upstater1 is offline  
Old 02-08-2008, 07:38 AM   #9
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,574
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: The Offense Could Be Even Better With 2 Smurfs.

Could Dave Thomas end up being the second "smurf"?

He certainly seems to have the ability to get 10-20 yards downfield, and he can certainly catch the ball. . . .
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is online now  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC