ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
2007 Patriots were designed to beat the Colts, NOT teams like the Giants
The Offensive Juggernaut was designed to outscore teams like Indianapolis, Pittsburgh and San Diego
NOT to beat a team like the Giants with punishing running game and defense.
In building this team, perhaps a stout defense and running game was less of a priority than an explosive offense.
It is very difficult to build a team that will do both.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: 2007 Patriots were designed to beat the Colts, NOT teams like the Giants
Quote:
Originally Posted by marcus
The Offensive Juggernaut was designed to outscore teams like Indianapolis, Pittsburgh and San Diego
NOT to beat a team like the Giants with punishing running game and defense.
In building this team, perhaps a stout defense and running game was less of a priority than an explosive offense.
It is very difficult to build a team that will do both.
They succeeded in their attempt to outscore our AFC rivals, however...
....the New York Giants were an anomaly that nobody saw coming. All season we figured they were a 2nd-tier team that would only make the playoffs b/c it's the NFC. In Week 17 we figured they'd lie down or be another easy NFC win, didn't happen. After that we figured they go down in the playoffs, didn't happen. After that we figured they wouldn't be able to stand up to the Pats a 2nd time in a Super Bowl, didn't happen.
Re: 2007 Patriots were designed to beat the Colts, NOT teams like the Giants
what punishing running? The Giants 3.5 average? lol
Our team wasnt design to beat any specific team. we built are team to win a Superbowl. Our team has the ability to do everything. Rush passer, stop run, pass ball, run ball, control clock, big plays. Did we play up to our capabilities? nope
whats the difference between Colts front 4 and Giants front 4? Both are built around speed. We know that..and we've struggled with that in past. Not the build of the team that hurt us..our OL simply fell face flat
Re: 2007 Patriots were designed to beat the Colts, NOT teams like the Giants
Our additions were indeed brought in to beat the Colts specifically. But the Giants were not so different from teams we beat in year's past, with the same exact players.
The Titans, the Panthers, the Steelers, these teams were very very similar to the Giants. They relied on a great pass rush, gritty QB play, and a good running game.
Re: 2007 Patriots were designed to beat the Colts, NOT teams like the Giants
I agree that the team was designed to win the NFL championship, not necessarily beat any single team (yes, though, the Colts were thought to be the best team at the time - they were Super Bowl champs last year at this time, after all).
It doesn't matter how a team is designed, it still has to execute and make plays. The Pats simply failed to make one more of any number of plays - sack Manning on third down, catch the INT,etc. - needed to win the title.
Against the Colts, the team clearly did this. Remember, in that game as well NE had a 4-point lead late in the game. The Pats made the play they needed - sacked Manning, forced a turnover and ran out the clock. Against the Giants and Eli, the same basic scenario unfolded - and yet he escaped and made the play of the game.
It comes down to making plays. We're talking about a razor-thin margin for error here, not about any serious flaws, shortcomings, or mistakes in design.
Last edited by Harry Yelreh; 02-05-2008 at 04:31 PM..
Re: 2007 Patriots were designed to beat the Colts, NOT teams like the Giants
Completely disagree.... If you look at the SB game again, the Pats almost won, despite being outplayed in every department of the game... Our O Line crumbled, their defense was fantastic and we had no running game, no passing game, nothing... (That last drive by TB was pretty good though and put us in a position to win)
Finally, the G Men won with a failed sack (incredible escape by Eli) and a superb, once in a lifetime catch by Tyree over his helmet. Nine times out of ten, that catch fails....
It all came to one play in the end.. We lost all the breaks (Asante missing, Harrision missing, Jarvis / Richard missing the sack... Any one of those could have ended the game for the G Men.
Anyway, I think the Giants played better at the end of the day and we didn't. End of story. They fought hard, gave it their all and won against a clearly superior team.