ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
__________________
My guns are no threat to anyone who isn't trying to deprive me or my family of life,liberty or property. They are,however, EXTREMELY dangerous to anyone who threatens to take those things.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
If you could provide us with a list of "those qualified to talk about something as an expert....and those who are not", it would be greatly appreciated by us fools who are not smart enough to decide for ourselves.
Further, your messageboard will be an even better place when the rest of us learn to cite only the opinions of those outlets that you view as appropriate.
C'mon, I know you are a big supporter of PFF, but articles like this are not rare on their site. They are just one of those sites that are trying to make a name for themselves with flawed, but unique grading systems and controversial articles like this. Unfortunately, instead of thought provoking, these articles are a joke when they put Justin Smith at #2 and Brady at #33. Smith had a good year (good enough to make him a Pro Bowl alternate), but not in the top 30 in terms of performances. Brady arguably had the best year out of any player and to discount that performance because Brady didn't stretch the field a lot devoid of a deep threat is ludicrious. Not many QBs could have done what Brady did with Deion Branch as his #1 WR (Matt Hasselbeck couldn't do it with Branch as his #3 WR).
C'mon, I know you are a big supporter of PFF, but articles like this are not rare on their site. They are just one of those sites that are trying to make a name for themselves with flawed, but unique grading systems and controversial articles like this. Unfortunately, instead of thought provoking, these articles are a joke when they put Justin Smith at #2 and Brady at #33. Smith had a good year (good enough to make him a Pro Bowl alternate), but not in the top 30 in terms of performances. Brady arguably had the best year out of any player and to discount that performance because Brady didn't stretch the field a lot devoid of a deep threat is ludicrious. Not many QBs could have done what Brady did with Deion Branch as his #1 WR (Matt Hasselbeck couldn't do it with Branch as his #3 WR).
Actually your very close. I am a big supporter of just about every site/news source. I want to hear what every organization/writer has to say and then decide for myself what to believe and what to dismiss. I may believe most of what one source says and then dismiss most of what another source says. But I want to hear all of the information.
Actually your very close. I am a big supporter of just about every site/news source. I want to hear what every organization/writer has to say and then decide for myself what to believe and what to dismiss. I may believe most of what one source says and then dismiss most of what another source says. But I want to hear all of the information.
I just like to decide for myself.
So what's your problem actually? Is anybody stopping you? He just called that site for what it is.
__________________
Three out of Four. Back-to-back.
If you could provide us with a list of "those qualified to talk about something as an expert....and those who are not", it would be greatly appreciated by us fools who are not smart enough to decide for ourselves.
Further, your messageboard will be an even better place when the rest of us learn to cite only the opinions of those outlets that you view as appropriate.
Who is stopping anyone from citing it? But if its garbage, we'll call it garbage. I don't understand your issue here. If someone posts a link to a site that is full of garbage every time, then posters here are going to point out that it's garbage...every time.
You happen to think it's not garbage. Good for you - but the rest of us have just as much a right to voice our opinion. You're the only one here trying to censor anyone. PFF can say whatever they want. And people who want to take a look deeper at them can also call their stuff worthless.
Nothing wrong has occurred here other than you taking offense to the latter b/c you happen to be a paying member at that site.
Actually your very close. I am a big supporter of just about every site/news source. I want to hear what every organization/writer has to say and then decide for myself what to believe and what to dismiss. I may believe most of what one source says and then dismiss most of what another source says. But I want to hear all of the information.
I just like to decide for myself.
Again, no one here is doing otherwise. It just happens that we dismiss PFF for what I would say are extremely valid reasons, and you do not.
__________________
My guns are no threat to anyone who isn't trying to deprive me or my family of life,liberty or property. They are,however, EXTREMELY dangerous to anyone who threatens to take those things.
Actually your very close. I am a big supporter of just about every site/news source. I want to hear what every organization/writer has to say and then decide for myself what to believe and what to dismiss. I may believe most of what one source says and then dismiss most of what another source says. But I want to hear all of the information.
I just like to decide for myself.
You pimp that site as if you get paid to do it, so let's not pretend that you're pure here and new to the party.
It's a garbage site that's alright if you want to use the raw data it produces for ballparking something, but is absolutely brutal for just about everything else.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
So, Brady is down the list of top rated QBs because his success is a product of system, great players around him, etc.
So, if that is really the case, does the sum of the Patriots offensive players grades surpass the sum of the grades of, say, the Packers? The Patriots scored more offensive points, so one would assume their offense as a whole grades higher than any other.
Is Brady + Gronk + Welker + BJGE + Mankins, etc > Rodgers + Jennings + Driver + Stitton, etc.
If not, then the system as a whole fails, and it's not the play of the "guys around Brady" that makes him great. If this is the case, then Brady's greatness grades out as system greatness.
To attribute offensive greatness to system contradicts what PFF does, doesn't it?
Who is stopping anyone from citing it? But if its garbage, we'll call it garbage. I don't understand your issue here. If someone posts a link to a site that is full of garbage every time, then posters here are going to point out that it's garbage...every time.
You happen to think it's not garbage. Good for you - but the rest of us have just as much a right to voice our opinion. You're the only one here trying to censor anyone. PFF can say whatever they want. And people who want to take a look deeper at them can also call their stuff worthless.
Nothing wrong has occurred here other than you taking offense to the latter b/c you happen to be a paying member at that site.
That is a lie sir. The only site I am a paying member of is this one. You are now on the ignore list. Have a good day.