01-28-2008, 11:56 AM
|
#8
|
|
PatsFans.com Supporter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
|
Re: Did not having a veteran backup QB cross your mind when the 'Ankle' was reported?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson
Knew he would play, but the first thought that crossed my mind under the possiblity he wouldnt was: We are so good, I bet we'd win even without him.
We'll never know, but I'd bet a lot that the other 52, would easily crank it up a notch and we would win any way.
We would probably run it 40 times and win one of those 13-7 type games, but we would win.
|
Not sure I'd go that far in this game. Brady and Belichick are the lynchpins around which this team is built. The impact of Brady's presence, even on his own defense, is immense. The 2001 team rallied around a kid QB, but the kid QB had something to do with that. More often than not since his mere presence has given them the belief that if they step up it will be enough because he will make the most of their effort.
Doesn't mean we're chopped liver without him, but we aren't a serious SB contender, just a potential contender in a league where it's not that hard to be that unless you are grossly mismanaged or incredibly unlucky. Maybe a Cassel or Gutierrez has some of that intangible that makes guys want to run through a wall for you...but I'm not counting on them having it to the level Brady does. Few ever have had it to that level. But I know that Vinny or Feeley or any of the veteran backups some here think we need don't have it at all or they wouldn't still or now be backups.
|
|
|