hypothetical trade scenario: Larry Fitzgerald or Tamba Hali? - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

View Poll Results: For our 1st & 3rd would you trade for:
Larry Fitzgerald (WR Cardinals) 38 40.86%
Tamba Hali (OLB Chiefs) 29 31.18%
Someone else (please specify) 2 2.15%
No trades - aquisitions only through the draft and FA 24 25.81%
Voters: 93. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-28-2011, 09:02 PM   #21
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
patsinthesnow's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,424
Default Re: hypothetical trade scenario

Hali or Asomugha.
patsinthesnow is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-28-2011, 10:24 PM   #22
In the Starting Line-up
 
NinjaZX6R's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,840
Default Re: hypothetical trade scenario

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729 View Post
Easily it would be Hali. He is familiar with the Pats' system and could step in right away. He would easily be the best OLB the Pats have had since McGinest or possibly Tippett. He is great vs. the run and the pass. Can play the Elephant role of being an OLB in the 3-4 and DE in sub packages.

Personally, I think he is my dream selection over any other free agents. I would want him over Fitzgerald who is more of a luxury than a need.
I know what a 4-3/3-4 Leo position is. What exactly is an Elephant position in a 3-4 2 gap system?
Also, Did Mike Vrabel play that position after Willie left?
Thanks
NinjaZX6R is offline  
Old 01-29-2011, 06:42 AM   #23
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 654
My Mood: Happy
Default Re: hypothetical trade scenario

hali, but he will probably be franchised.

i like fitzgerald and he would look great in a patriots uniform but the patriots are already averaging 30 points per game against every team not named the new york jets and tom brady was back to 2007 form in the dink and dunk offense.

This offense needs to solidify their O-line and it all starts with resigning Mankins, this team needs to be able to run the ball with greater success if they want to beat the jets because revis will take fitzgerald away like he has before.
serifyn is offline  
Old 01-29-2011, 08:55 AM   #24
Rookie
 

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Groveland, Fl
Posts: 35
My Mood: Twisted
Default Re: hypothetical trade scenario

Quote:
Originally Posted by tb4u View Post
I would rather see them use the 17th and another pick. hopefully one of the 3rds to move up in the first round to get Von Miller from Texas A&M. He is a monster.

Von Miller has been getting handled by TEs and Tackles at Senior Bowl practices. I think OLB is where we need to go but starting to think there is better value with DE cam Jordan from cal who can play the 5.
patsoxfan is offline  
Old 01-29-2011, 12:20 PM   #25
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,690
Default Re: hypothetical trade scenario

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsoxfan View Post
Von Miller has been getting handled by TEs and Tackles at Senior Bowl practices. I think OLB is where we need to go but starting to think there is better value with DE cam Jordan from cal who can play the 5.
Link?
I heard the opposite.
Methinks there is trouble on the horizon with Mankins. If he wants $10m ($8m + what he lost last year)I would easily go after Fitzgerald.

This is my favorite time of the year to aggravate some who feel their opinions weigh much more than anybody else. They will be first responders here. Hypothetical gentlemen!

I don't know if the Mankins situation is lost. If so, an idea for a blockbuster helps both teams, is realistic and a win for both in personnel issues. The Pats and Cards.
Faneca will be 35 an no longer playing at a high leveL and he was signed for only one year at $2.5m, so is is a FA. Mankins is certainly an upgrade.

Fitz is ready to move on.

DE Darnell Dockett would be coveted here. He has the right length, is a high motor guy and can rush the passer and is signed for four years. He is 29.

Adrian Wilson I put up as one of the smarter Safeties in the league. He has range and size. He is 31 so he has a few good years left. He is 6'3" and 230 and has ball skills. He calls their DB plays. We have to rely on the least talented Safety we have in Sanders (who had a decent year but is still a coverage liability) for that. Wilson is signed through 2013.

All of our Safeties are short. Page is the tallest at 6'. Sanders is only 5'10" all the rest are only 5'11". When you have Edwards, Floyd, Calvin Johnson etc., we are not competing against that skill set on jump balls or fades when the Safety has to help out.

My idea (my opinion) is a neat blockbuster.
Mankins (FA NOW), Merriweather (FA 2012 NEXT YEAR), Tate (THEY WOULD NEED A WR BACK) and the Vikings 4th rounder for Fitzgerald (SIGNED BUT MORE YEARS BY EXTENSION), Dockett (SIGNED) and Wilson (SIGNED).

I'd start at the fourth round but go to a first if I had to make this deal. We have to contend with Mankins this year and then Merriweather (WHO HIS AGENT WILL ATTEST WAS A PRO BOWLER IN 2010 WHICH WE ALL QUESTION HERE, SO HOLD ON TO YOUR HAT WHEN HE ASKS FOR THE $) next year.

So we get Fitz, Dockett and Wilson
They get Mankins, Merriweather and Tate (we have to give them some WR value) and probably a first rounder (start at 4th).

The question is, with the Mankins situation surely a killer, what is the best for the Pats going forward?

I think Chung and Wilson with Sanders at swing and STs, would be a better set of Safeties.

Dockett solves some of the DE issues and pass rush.

Fitz is just too talented to pass up and is a Team kid.

Now go Draft OL G (I like G Danny Watkins or Moffitt), OT (one of the top three and I like Gabe C.) and a OLB and I do think Miller is special. Pick up a RB and a Safety like this kid Sands of WV later on and it was a great off-season if we have to forfeit Mankins.

Is it a bad deal for the Cards? No they will lose Fitz anyway and now get a top pick and players.

Bad for us? Nope.


DW Toys

Last edited by DW Toys; 01-29-2011 at 12:24 PM..
DW Toys is offline  
Old 01-29-2011, 12:48 PM   #26
Rookie
 

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Groveland, Fl
Posts: 35
My Mood: Twisted
Default Re: hypothetical trade scenario

Boston.com senior bowl quick hits III. I have been watching the practices he does not look great to me. Casey Mathews looks really Quick but small. The Offensive linemen look like a deep group along with D-line.Might be some sleeper WRs too.
patsoxfan is offline  
Old 01-29-2011, 01:11 PM   #27
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
JoeSixPat's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,350
Default Re: hypothetical trade scenario

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tucker View Post
x2

this is possibly the best 3 sentences I have read on here in a few days.
Well done sir

For the record, my choice would be Hali as well. We need that pass rush like a crack head needs crack ha. My dream scenario would have us grabbing a DE at 17, making a trade for Hali and grabbig a C/G at 33.
Unfortunately far too much comes down to how the CBA negotiations are going - I don't see this as a year when too many owners want to commit big signing bonuses to sign new free agents unless there is a new CBA - would Bob Kraft go against the tide and commit the cash prior to a lockout year? I suppose if Belichick told him it was enough of a priority he would (as was the case with Brady)
JoeSixPat is offline  
Old 01-29-2011, 01:25 PM   #28
All Pro Poster
 
VJCPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,640
Default Re: hypothetical trade scenario

Quote:
Originally Posted by DW Toys View Post
So we get Fitz, Dockett and Wilson
They get Mankins, Merriweather and Tate (we have to give them some WR value) and probably a first rounder (start at 4th).
Are you kidding me? We would be bending Arizona over and robbing them blind in that trade. They're not going to give up Dockett and Wilson in addition to Fitzgerald. Sounds nice in theory. But no GM would be dumb enough to agree to that trade. Matt Millen doesn't run the Cards.

I do think that Tate and a 1st rounder for Fitzgerald sounds like a fair offer. Tate would essentially replace Breaston for the Cards, and with the 1st rounder they could look to draft a new wideout.
__________________
Pats NEW LOOK Offense

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Weapons Galore!

Last edited by VJCPatriot; 01-29-2011 at 01:28 PM..
VJCPatriot is online now  
Old 01-29-2011, 04:50 PM   #29
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,690
Default Re: hypothetical trade scenario

Quote:
Originally Posted by VJCPatriot View Post
Are you kidding me? We would be bending Arizona over and robbing them blind in that trade. They're not going to give up Dockett and Wilson in addition to Fitzgerald. Sounds nice in theory. But no GM would be dumb enough to agree to that trade. Matt Millen doesn't run the Cards.

I do think that Tate and a 1st rounder for Fitzgerald sounds like a fair offer. Tate would essentially replace Breaston for the Cards, and with the 1st rounder they could look to draft a new wideout.
Fair enough.
DW Toys
DW Toys is offline  
Old 01-30-2011, 08:02 AM   #30
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: tiverton
Posts: 403
Default Re: hypothetical trade scenario

I thought the comp for a franchise player was two number ones.

Hali might be worth it. And KC might not match for that price. It would be the #28 this year and figure close to that next year. The pats would then probably trade 33 into next year.
patman52 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crazy hypothetical mentally inbalanced nutball whackjob psycho scenario Lifer The Practice Squad 20 12-29-2008 07:43 AM
My overly hypothetical SF trade offer! smg93 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 50 11-24-2008 03:50 PM
Hypothetical Scenario ayjackson Patriots Draft Talk 13 03-17-2008 11:12 AM
How about this trade scenario? Crazyeechrispats1 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 23 02-25-2008 11:46 PM
Hypothetical Trade ATippett56 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 24 02-05-2007 02:08 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC