Realistic talent evaluation - positions Pats can improve on for 2011 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-19-2011, 11:26 AM   #1
All Pro Poster
 
RayClay's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 15,678
My Mood: Amused
Default Realistic talent evaluation - positions Pats can improve on for 2011

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damon Runyon View Post
“The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, but that's the way to bet.”
I'm no scout, likely neither are you. However, we need to evaluate for the future, what we have and where we can improve.

No binkies here. If a player makes the team from nowhere and becomes a lock, that's rare. Most players need to make the team every year, at least a young team like ours.

You're realistic assessment of where we can offer "competition" to players next year.

Brady's good. Not talking about backups here.

RB

BJGE - great effort and character. I see at least two new RBs and Taylor gone and Morris too perhaps. I doubt we end up with BJ as a starter, but if he wins the job, more power to him. I would really work on my agility and pass catching if I were him.

Woodhead can start as a 3rd down back IMO. As Faulk showed, it's a matter of reliability if you can be a change of pace guy and pass catcher and Woody can. Not a hard position to fill talent wise, since these undersized smurfs don't have a lot of options.

TE

Beat these guys out, I dare you. 2 future stars and a great blocking TE with a lot of tread on the tires. Crumpler is a great option as a possession guy in a pinch, not so much when has to move.

WR

Or slot or whatever. Welker will hopefully bounce back in year two flexibility wise. Branch is fine, but not in his prime. Tate needs to win a job from the draftees and Price. We need a Branch of old type, in my opinion. Those quick and fast route runners excel here. the big long striders, not so much. Edelman needs to win a job. Probably at least two serious contenders from FA or draft.

OL

Need to stock the pond here. My choice would be Vollmer at LT with RT and guard/center options in the
draft. Whatever business occurs with Mankins dictates that.

DL

Wilfork is gold, the rest need to win jobs. I see no sacred cows here. Hope Brace proves solid and Gerard Warren make it barring some spectacular rookies. If Ty comes back strong, their's a real squeeze. Our top pick, or picks goes to a DE if available.

Great effort by this group and i love them dearly, but it's a bidness.

ILB

Barring character issues (hello Brandon) we seem to have the right rotation of the right players in the right place. Guyton's affordable and in the role he's best suited for. Don't see any openings in this group.

OLB/DE

I think a premier DE and other D Line improvements helps this group, but i just don't know. Apparently overall improvement has been made, but i would like to see somebody pick up an O lineman and throw him at the QB for a change. Don't really know if it's a talent, scheme or experience issue here, so I'll just say a dominating pass rusher from within or without.

Safety Good, deep group. Is Chung badly injured, or did he just disappear? Is Meriweather a head case? We've seemed to have good talent here, but never quite delivered solid consistent play. except for sanders, the guy everyone hates?

Good young group, but some more competition or moves isn't out of the question.

CB sure looks good with McCourty and Bodden. some competition for backups, but damn, that Arrington is the definition of winning a job! Unfortunately, it will be a backup job, but i don't think you could keep him off the team with a sledgehammer.

The rest is ifs and buts, candy and nuts. Some talent, some experience, but backup jobs could be won.

Obviously, some players won jobs on special teams and we need to keep on improving there. Wondering if the coaching is up to par. Could be something to watch. Of course Gost kicking it into the stands will help.

Your thoughts on needs?
__________________
Quote:
WE ARE BUILDING A TEAM, NOT COLLECTING TALENT

Last edited by jmt57; 02-01-2011 at 12:12 PM..
RayClay is online now  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-19-2011, 12:21 PM   #2
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default Re: Realistic talent evaluation

QB - We will bring in a quarterback and a 4th for camp. We always do. My personal choice is a veteran free agent. A 3rd QB will be make more sense with an additional 3 rosters spots which seems likely.

RB - I agree with you comments. We will keep at most one of Taylor, Morris and Faulk.

TE - The best in the league.

WR - We had the best passing game in the nfl, and yet we have a weakness at wide receiver. We need at least one. However, I would add that Price and Tate are there to compete for the out positions. This is the second place I see an extra position with the expanded roster.

I disagree with regard to the slot. I think that we're fine with Welker and Edelman.

OL - I like the OL much more than you do. That being said, we certainly need at least one interior lineman as well as an OT (if we don't extend Light). I would extend Light if we could. I would also not be surprised to see us extend Koppen. As you say, Mankins is the key. If he is not re-signed, OG is our #1 priority by far (although value for DE may very well be at 17). Certainly, we would be looking at guard in the last first.

DL - I agree: Wilfork and the rest, with only 2 guaranteed jobs: Wilfork and the top draftee
I too would bring back Gerard Warren to compete in camp. The really good news is that we have lots of players who could be solid players or starters. We have a very young line (another reason to keep the experience of G Warren). Here is the 3rd spot I see using the extra roster position.

OLB - Sure everyone here (and every team) would like to add a stud playmaker. The reality is that the OLB's played very well. An improved DL will help lots. Belichick may pick an OLB early, or not. Of course, much depends on what free agents we extend or sign before the draft.

CB - I agree with your assessment. We are fine, but Belichick will always being in competition, perhaps from the draft, but almost surely from the free agent pool.

S - For years, folks wanted to dump Sanders. Now the target is probowler Meriweather. I don't get it. Belichick had Meriweather play 88% of the defensive snaps. He is going nowhere in 2011. We are all set for 2011 with Sanders, Chung, and Meriweather. That being said, we need to develop a safety for 2012. It takes a year (at least), and it seem unlikely that both Meriweather and Sanders will be counted on for over 50% of the reps in 2012. Also, Page or/and McGowan should be in camp competing for a roster spot.

REVIEW - BOTTOM LINE
1) Let's see if we re-sign Mankins and Light (and Warren and Page and Faulk).
2) Let's see who we pick up in free agency (I expect a RB and WR).
As of now, presuming that either Light or Mankins is back:

I would draft DE, OL and BNPA (best needed player available; hopefully an OLB) with our first three picks. After that, the red-chippers are gone, and Belichick will draft BNPA with every pick.

Belichick doesn't go into draft with more than one need that MUST be met in this draft. Last year that need was TE. This year, the need is likely to be OL. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't draft a DE at 17, just as we didn't draft Gronk with our first pick. I think that Belichick is always ready to play without rookie contributions, except at this one position. He is always willing to give a draftee at least a year to develop as he did for example Chung.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RayClay View Post
I'm no scout, likely neither are you. However, we need to evaluate for the future, what we have and where we can improve.

No binkies here. If a player makes the team from nowhere and becomes a lock, that's rare. Most players need to make the team every year, at least a young team like ours.

You're realistic assessment of where we can offer "competition" to players next year.

Brady's good. Not talking about backups here.

RB

BJGE - great effort and character. I see at least two new RBs and Taylor gone and Morris too perhaps. I doubt we end up with BJ as a starter, but if he wins the job, more power to him. I would really work on my agility and pass catching if I were him.

Woodhead can start as a 3rd down back IMO. As Faulk showed, it's a matter of reliability if you can be a change of pace guy and pass catcher and Woody can. Not a hard position to fill talent wise, since these undersized smurfs don't have a lot of options.

TE

Beat these guys out, I dare you. 2 future stars and a great blocking TE with a lot of tread on the tires. Crumpler is a great option as a possession guy in a pinch, not so much when has to move.

WR

Or slot or whatever. Welker will hopefully bounce back in year two flexibility wise. Branch is fine, but not in his prime. Tate needs to win a job from the draftees and Price. We need a Branch of old type, in my opinion. Those quick and fast route runners excel here. the big long striders, not so much. Edelman needs to win a job. Probably at least two serious contenders from FA or draft.

OL

Need to stock the pond here. My choice would be Vollmer at LT with RT and guard/center options in the
draft. Whatever business occurs with Mankins dictates that.

DL

Wilfork is gold, the rest need to win jobs. I see no sacred cows here. Hope Brace proves solid and Gerard Warren make it barring some spectacular rookies. If Ty comes back strong, their's a real squeeze. Our top pick, or picks goes to a DE if available.

Great effort by this group and i love them dearly, but it's a bidness.

ILB

Barring character issues (hello Brandon) we seem to have the right rotation of the right players in the right place. Guyton's affordable and in the role he's best suited for. Don't see any openings in this group.

OLB/DE

I think a premier DE and other D Line improvements helps this group, but i just don't know. Apparently overall improvement has been made, but i would like to see somebody pick up an O lineman and throw him at the QB for a change. Don't really know if it's a talent, scheme or experience issue here, so I'll just say a dominating pass rusher from within or without.

Safety Good, deep group. Is Chung badly injured, or did he just disappear? Is Meriweather a head case? We've seemed to have good talent here, but never quite delivered solid consistent play. except for sanders, the guy everyone hates?

Good young group, but some more competition or moves isn't out of the question.

CB sure looks good with McCourty and Bodden. some competition for backups, but damn, that Arrington is the definition of winning a job! Unfortunately, it will be a backup job, but i don't think you could keep him off the team with a sledgehammer.

The rest is ifs and buts, candy and nuts. Some talent, some experience, but backup jobs could be won.

Obviously, some players won jobs on special teams and we need to keep on improving there. Wondering if the coaching is up to par. Could be something to watch. Of course Gost kicking it into the stands will help.

Your thoughts on needs?
mgteich is offline  
Old 01-19-2011, 12:25 PM   #3
All Pro Poster
 
PATSYLICIOUS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,236
Default Re: Realistic talent evaluation

Nice breakdown Ray

I see the last phase of our rebuilding this offseson in addressing the OL, prioritizng on the interior and a developmental tackle while signing Light to a short term deal. Definitely hope Mankins is locked up, I'm not sold on Connolly and Neal will either retire or get injured again. C needs addressed. I'd like a higher pick here or 2, especially if Mankins isn't kept.

The other priorities are DE and OLB. The defense is well on its way, just need to hopefully find a couple guys who are stout vs. the run and make an impact getting to the QB. If they land one at each position that's amazing, if not depth is still needed here and I think the defense will continue to improve regardless.

Secondary needs:
RB - Some depth behind BJGE/Woodhead. I'm fine with them carrying the load so wouldn't put RB as a priority, but replacements for the older guys as backups, and I have no idea where/if Clayton fits in our plans. And maybe a WR to compete with Price/Tate/Edelman for the final 3 spots, though I see the 3 of them in our plans for next season. Perhaps a safety with Merriweather entering the final year of his contract.

I feel as usual the draft and bargain FA"s are sufficient for our needs. Another season under the youngsters' belt plus hopeful return of Bodden/Warren should already provide improvement for the team. A good draft and sky's the limit
__________________
Organized madness
The young Gott-stra
Young Frank Sinatra
PATSYLICIOUS is offline  
Old 01-19-2011, 12:32 PM   #4
All Pro Poster
 
PATRIOTSFANINPA's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 15,286
My Mood: Bitchy
Default Re: Realistic talent evaluation

I noticed no mention of Faulk who I think has a good chance to decide to retire or maybe the team finally goes elsewhere like with Bruschi.

I would look for a power fullback if Kevin does go...2 more RBs is what I expect to fill the roster and one of them to get the #1 starting job,BJGE was a great story in 2010,but I would be surprised to see him stay on top.

As far as corners are concerned,Butler is going to be here and will probably be the #3 on the depth charts despite losing his job this year.
PATRIOTSFANINPA is offline  
Old 01-19-2011, 12:40 PM   #5
Rookie
 

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 14
Default Re: Realistic talent evaluation

We NEED a fullback. The spread offense has not worked in the playoffs and it is no coincidence that the 3 teams who beat us (Giants, Ravens, Jets) were all run-oriented teams with good defences.

The Pats need to be able to pound the ball in the playoffs which will open up play-action. We got the great tight end now in Gronk, we need a fullback and possibly another talented power RB. Go back to the '04 offense.
Manning's Pick 6 is offline  
Old 01-19-2011, 12:56 PM   #6
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
Fencer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,424
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Realistic talent evaluation

Quote:
Originally Posted by RayClay View Post
I'm no scout, likely neither are you. However, we need to evaluate for the future, what we have and where we can improve.

No binkies here. If a player makes the team from nowhere and becomes a lock, that's rare. Most players need to make the team every year, at least a young team like ours.

You're realistic assessment of where we can offer "competition" to players next year.

Brady's good. Not talking about backups here.

RB

BJGE - great effort and character. I see at least two new RBs and Taylor gone and Morris too perhaps. I doubt we end up with BJ as a starter, but if he wins the job, more power to him. I would really work on my agility and pass catching if I were him.

Nothing wrong with BJGE in the running game. But he's too unspecial (blocking or receiving) in the passing game. Hard to top that one's rookie season.

Woodhead can start as a 3rd down back IMO. As Faulk showed, it's a matter of reliability if you can be a change of pace guy and pass catcher and Woody can. Not a hard position to fill talent wise, since these undersized smurfs don't have a lot of options.

TE

Beat these guys out, I dare you. 2 future stars and a great blocking TE with a lot of tread on the tires. Crumpler is a great option as a possession guy in a pinch, not so much when has to move.

WR

Or slot or whatever. Welker will hopefully bounce back in year two flexibility wise. Branch is fine, but not in his prime. Tate needs to win a job from the draftees and Price. We need a Branch of old type, in my opinion. Those quick and fast route runners excel here. the big long striders, not so much. Edelman needs to win a job. Probably at least two serious contenders from FA or draft.

Not sure that a lot of resources get spent here. Branch, 3 youngsters, and Welker all have reasons to improve over the offseason.


OL

Need to stock the pond here. My choice would be Vollmer at LT with RT and guard/center options in the
draft. Whatever business occurs with Mankins dictates that.

I'd like to see Light and Mankins both resigned, albeit to very different kinds of deals. That still leaves plenty of room for restocking.

DL

Wilfork is gold, the rest need to win jobs. I see no sacred cows here. Hope Brace proves solid and Gerard Warren make it barring some spectacular rookies. If Ty comes back strong, their's a real squeeze. Our top pick, or picks goes to a DE if available.

Great effort by this group and i love them dearly, but it's a bidness.

Tough to call this one, as we lack insight into the prognoses of Ty Warren or Mike Wright.


ILB

Barring character issues (hello Brandon) we seem to have the right rotation of the right players in the right place. Guyton's affordable and in the role he's best suited for. Don't see any openings in this group.

OLB/DE

I think a premier DE and other D Line improvements helps this group, but i just don't know. Apparently overall improvement has been made, but i would like to see somebody pick up an O lineman and throw him at the QB for a change. Don't really know if it's a talent, scheme or experience issue here, so I'll just say a dominating pass rusher from within or without.

Easier said than done. We haven't had one since Willie, and even he could only bring it in the clutch rather than consistently.


Safety Good, deep group. Is Chung badly injured, or did he just disappear? Is Meriweather a head case? We've seemed to have good talent here, but never quite delivered solid consistent play. except for sanders, the guy everyone hates?

Good young group, but some more competition or moves isn't out of the question.

CB sure looks good with McCourty and Bodden. some competition for backups, but damn, that Arrington is the definition of winning a job! Unfortunately, it will be a backup job, but i don't think you could keep him off the team with a sledgehammer.

Agreed re Arrington. And if Meriweather is dumped, Arrington may be first in line for his role.

The rest is ifs and buts, candy and nuts. Some talent, some experience, but backup jobs could be won.

Obviously, some players won jobs on special teams and we need to keep on improving there. Wondering if the coaching is up to par. Could be something to watch. Of course Gost kicking it into the stands will help.

Your thoughts on needs?
A major upgrade to Morris at FB would be nice, but I'm not sure it's worth the roster slot, as per the fullback-specific thread.
__________________
"To lose one parent may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness." -- Oscar Wilde
Fencer is offline  
Old 01-19-2011, 01:02 PM   #7
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
 
Deus Irae's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35,623
Default Re: Realistic talent evaluation

Quote:
Originally Posted by RayClay View Post
Your thoughts on needs?
1.) The team must re-sign Mankins

2.) After that, DE and OLB are the team's two biggest needs (assuming Neal returns). Outside of Ty and Vince, there's nothing on the line worth worrying about for opponents. Further development by Brace could help here, but that's not enough. As for OLB, they were lousy as starters this year, and pretty bad even as backups. The team could replace every one of them except Cunningham, and it wouldn't shock me.

3.) After DE and OLB (or before, if Neal retires), RG is a definite need. Whether it's for someone to compete with Neal, or for someone to replace Connolly as the starter, this position needs to be fixed, and it needs to be a priority. Finding a center to groom is also something that should be looked at in the mid-late rounds.

4.) RB and WR are next in line. The team needs a deep/speed receiver who can threaten the safeties and keep the defenses honest. All the tight ends in the world can't do that.

5.) After that, you're looking at depth spots and development players. CB is always a position to look at, given how often they go down in Belichick's system. If the team isn't planning on keeping Meriweather long-term, safety becomes a position of interest. Light should be re-signed, but the team will need to look for a future starter at either right or left tackle.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
Deus Irae is online now  
Old 01-19-2011, 01:10 PM   #8
In the Starting Line-up
 
aluminum seats's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,371
Default Re: Realistic talent evaluation

Don't think they'll be much disagreement here on the fortification of the lines, and to a lesser extent, an OLB.

What I think will be interesting, and go a long way to showing how they really feel about Price, is what happens at WR. If we don't see a high-profile FA signing and/or high pick, I think that will indicate they're pretty high on him. Similar deal at RB.
__________________
"So I'm going to throw myself against the wall...
'Cause I'd rather feel bad than not feel anything at all."
aluminum seats is offline  
Old 01-19-2011, 01:35 PM   #9
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default Re: Realistic talent evaluation

Even if Neal "comes back", we cannot count on him for a full season. If your not happy with Connolly, Wendell and Ohrnberger, I suggest that we need help at OG. But this is nitpicking. We agree that OG is a major need.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae View Post
1.) The team must re-sign Mankins

2.) After that, DE and OLB are the team's two biggest needs (assuming Neal returns). Outside of Ty and Vince, there's nothing on the line worth worrying about for opponents. Further development by Brace could help here, but that's not enough. As for OLB, they were lousy as starters this year, and pretty bad even as backups. The team could replace every one of them except Cunningham, and it wouldn't shock me.

3.) After DE and OLB (or before, if Neal retires), RG is a definite need. Whether it's for someone to compete with Neal, or for someone to replace Connolly as the starter, this position needs to be fixed, and it needs to be a priority. Finding a center to groom is also something that should be looked at in the mid-late rounds.

4.) RB and WR are next in line. The team needs a deep/speed receiver who can threaten the safeties and keep the defenses honest. All the tight ends in the world can't do that.

5.) After that, you're looking at depth spots and development players. CB is always a position to look at, given how often they go down in Belichick's system. If the team isn't planning on keeping Meriweather long-term, safety becomes a position of interest. Light should be re-signed, but the team will need to look for a future starter at either right or left tackle.
mgteich is offline  
Old 01-19-2011, 01:39 PM   #10
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
ATippett56's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,075
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Realistic talent evaluation

Quote:
Originally Posted by RayClay View Post
RB

BJGE - great effort and character. I see at least two new RBs and Taylor gone and Morris too perhaps. I doubt we end up with BJ as a starter, but if he wins the job, more power to him. I would really work on my agility and pass catching if I were him.

Woodhead can start as a 3rd down back IMO. As Faulk showed, it's a matter of reliability if you can be a change of pace guy and pass catcher and Woody can. Not a hard position to fill talent wise, since these undersized smurfs don't have a lot of options.
Not worth drafting a running back until the fourth round. Undrafted free agent running backs have made impacts across a number of NFL rosters.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RayClay View Post
TE

Beat these guys out, I dare you. 2 future stars and a great blocking TE with a lot of tread on the tires. Crumpler is a great option as a possession guy in a pinch, not so much when has to move.
Not worth expending a draft pick on a tight end whatsoever.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RayClay View Post
WR

Or slot or whatever. Welker will hopefully bounce back in year two flexibility wise. Branch is fine, but not in his prime. Tate needs to win a job from the draftees and Price. We need a Branch of old type, in my opinion. Those quick and fast route runners excel here. the big long striders, not so much. Edelman needs to win a job. Probably at least two serious contenders from FA or draft.
It normally takes two to three seasons to develop a wide receiver straight from the collegiate ranks. Furthermore, since 2002 NFL Draft, the New England Patriots have not selected a wide receiver that has developed to be a dependable offensive option. Go the free agency route!


Quote:
Originally Posted by RayClay View Post
OL

Need to stock the pond here. My choice would be Vollmer at LT with RT and guard/center options in the draft. Whatever business occurs with Mankins dictates that.
One of the top three draft priorities for the New England Patriots in the 2011 NFL Draft is the replacement of Stephen Neal as the starting offensive right guard. No later than the 28th selection overall in the 2011 NFL Draft, the New England Patriots need to select the next starting offensive right guard (for example, Mike Pouncey from Florida). Furthermore, in rounds 4 - 6 a backup offensive guard needs to be selected in order to permanently replace Dan Connolly (it's called removing the trash from the Patriots roster). Since Matt Light will be an unrestricted free agent at the conclusion of the 2010 NFL season and Nick Kaczur will be returning from back surgery, a backup offensive tackle needs to be selected no later than the third round.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RayClay View Post
DL

Wilfork is gold, the rest need to win jobs. I see no sacred cows here. Hope Brace proves solid and Gerard Warren make it barring some spectacular rookies. If Ty comes back strong, their's a real squeeze. Our top pick, or picks goes to a DE if available.

Great effort by this group and i love them dearly, but it's a bidness.
Ty Warren is not a sacred cow? Sheer heresy! One of the top three priorities for the New England Patriots in the 2011 NFL Draft is the selection of a five technique defensive lineman to play right defensive end in the New England Patriots 3-4 defensive scheme. Either the #17th or #33rd overall selection should be utilized on a 5 technique defensive lineman who has shown in the collegiate ranks the ability to rush the passer or consistently draw double teams yet be stout against the run. As for the definition of value, if Marcel Dareus from Alabama would fall to #17 ......

Quote:
Originally Posted by RayClay View Post
ILB

Barring character issues (hello Brandon) we seem to have the right rotation of the right players in the right place. Guyton's affordable and in the role he's best suited for. Don't see any openings in this group.
Not worth expending a draft pick on an inside linebacker whatsoever.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RayClay View Post
OLB/DE

I think a premier DE and other D Line improvements helps this group, but i just don't know. Apparently overall improvement has been made, but i would like to see somebody pick up an O lineman and throw him at the QB for a change. Don't really know if it's a talent, scheme or experience issue here, so I'll just say a dominating pass rusher from within or without.
One of the top three priorities for the New England Patriots in the 2011 NFL Draft is the selection of a 3-4 outside linebacker who is stout against the run yet able to rush the quarterback. Either the #17th or #33rd overall selection should be utilized on a 3-4 outside linebacker and in addition a late second round or third round selection should be utilized on another 3-4 outside linebacker. Wave bye-bye to Tully Banta-Cain and Eric Moore.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RayClay View Post
Safety

Good, deep group. Is Chung badly injured, or did he just disappear? Is Meriweather a head case? We've seemed to have good talent here, but never quite delivered solid consistent play. except for sanders, the guy everyone hates?

Good young group, but some more competition or moves isn't out of the question.
Not worth expending a draft pick until the 5th or 6th round, if at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RayClay View Post
CB

It sure looks good with McCourty and Bodden. Some competition for backups, but damn, that Arrington is the definition of winning a job! Unfortunately, it will be a backup job, but i don't think you could keep him off the team with a sledgehammer.
Not worth expending a draft pick until the 5th or 6th round, if at all.
__________________
The End of the Chad Ochostinko Era!

Last edited by ATippett56; 01-19-2011 at 01:41 PM..
ATippett56 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A somewhat realistic replacement at WR alphilip77 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 49 10-12-2010 02:40 PM
Talent Evaluation/Coaching R_T26 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 7 09-21-2010 05:38 AM
Let's be realistic Patters PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 8 11-08-2005 12:18 PM
Some realistic IFs... patsox23 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 9 10-24-2005 06:09 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC