ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
I never would have expected that! I would have guessed several other former players brought in for a walk-through before Bethel.
__________________
Drink like a beast.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
but i think if we do take him back, it will be solely for ST purposes...maybe a cheaper version of Kelley washington? who i dont think will be back next yr, and we wont need for the wr position?
__________________
Last time I lived in New England the Pats became a Dynasty
It always seemed like Bethel was on the outs for attitude and/or intellectual reasons. That's why I'm most surprised. Although, to be fair if you watch the 2003 3GTG, Bethel's role was quite prevalent.
__________________
Drink like a beast.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
It always seemed like Bethel was on the outs for attitude and/or intellectual reasons. That's why I'm most surprised. Although, to be fair if you watch the 2003 3GTG, Bethel's role was quite prevalent.
the 2003 wut? 3 games to glory????
__________________
Last time I lived in New England the Pats became a Dynasty
Guys I read about this in an article at Patriots Insiders last night. I didn't want to post it because those guys are very sensitive about that kind of thing. The article I read suggested that this interest in Bethel Johnson might have something to do with Stallworth and Jackson. I have had a feeling all year that one or both of those guys will be gone this offseason. This is definately something to watch. They did say something else that was very interesting in the article. They suggested that the Pats might make a move at the WR position during the Playoffs. I wonder who they are going to cut to make a move like that?
I was very surprised that last week that Jackson was inactive and Spann was promoted to take Andrew's spot. He's not even useful on Special Teams and he's healthy. I honestly thought that Jackson would establish a role for himself on the team after he came off PUP. I'm surprised that he hasn't.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. AKA "Ladypatsfan"
Last edited by DefenseRules; 01-04-2008 at 06:43 AM..
c'mon. This isn't about the WR position. This is all about kickoff return. BB is looking at the Chicago STs with envy, asking himself "how do I get something like THAT?"
Using your starting CB or starting WR as your kickoff return guy is playing with fire, especially in the playoffs. Willie Andrews is an option, but Faulk is not a guy that's going to break a kickoff for a TD. Bethel has always been a compelling weapon on kickoff return. The fact that BB tried Jackson at kickoff return (vs Miami? or was it the Jets?) is a sign that he's reaching for options.
At WR, at best BJ projects as a #5 guy. I bet Kelly Washington beats him out at WR. We could fill that role with street fodder and give ourselves a chance to find another David Patten or Jabar Gaffney in the weeds, instead of working with a player who's a known quantity.
As for the WR position:
There is no question to me that Stallworth is gone this offseason. His pricetag this year is pretty high, and his option to renew is very high. The fact that Gaffney has clearly taken the #3 spot in the rotation is a pretty clear indication that Stallworth is underachieving.
Jackson's inability to rise up the depth chart is a minor concern, too, but a little easier to rationalize. Didn't he recently get a black jersey for his play on the scout team? That counts in the eyes of this coach.
Kelly Washington has been a star on ST, but hasn't broken into he receiving corp, either. I think he's a keeper, if only for ST. ST counts! How else do you think guys like Izzo, Alexander, Andrews and Woods stick on a roster this deep with talent, year after year?
I expect, we lose Stallworth and drop Troy next season. What happens to Jackson and Washington is for consideration and probably depends as much on ST contributions as potential at WR. I expect they'll be in camp, and we'll see who else is invited to compete. With Moss, Welker and Gaffney, we still have the best receiving corp in the league, regardless who the #4 and 5 guys are.
__________________
"We want to build a big, strong, tough, smart, fast, disciplined football team that will consistently compete for a championship."
-- Scott Pioli, from the Patriots scouting manual
maybe it's a simple as Troy Brown's knee not being able to handle live action. Sentiment aside, even BB couldn't afford to keep a gimpy TB on the roster for the playoffs when everything is do or die. The Pats already had to cut a guy with potential - Kareem Brown - to get TB on the field, if Troy's struggling I can't imagine them chopping another player just so TB can enjoy the ride.
__________________
King of my matchbox sized world