One On One on The Wide Receivers - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-17-2011, 05:30 AM   #1
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,114
Default One On One on The Wide Receivers

In the nfl, teams look for their receivers to be defended one on one. This is a situation where teams have a high percentage chance for a big play. This happens even with average wide receivers.

When Moss was here, Revis needed safety help against Moss most of the time. Cromartie need safety help also.

In this game, the corners didn't need help (or not very much). So, when they were in a nickel back situations, they had 3 defensive backs ton defend the middle instead of 1 or 2.

BOTTOM LINE
Other teams cannot be allowed to be able to consistently cover our wide receivers one on one. We need better receivers or someone else developing schemes and calling plays. Or both. Tate is not the answer; perhaps Price is. But both wideouts should command a double team.
mgteich is online now  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-17-2011, 05:44 AM   #2
JFK
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 973
Default Re: One On One on The Wide Receivers

Calvin Johnson. I'll trade whatever for him. He can do it all.
JFK is offline  
Old 01-17-2011, 05:51 AM   #3
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,033
Default Re: One On One on The Wide Receivers

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich View Post
In the nfl, teams look for their receivers to be defended one on one. This is a situation where teams have a high percentage chance for a big play. This happens even with average wide receivers.

When Moss was here, Revis needed safety help against Moss most of the time. Cromartie need safety help also.

In this game, the corners didn't need help (or not very much). So, when they were in a nickel back situations, they had 3 defensive backs ton defend the middle instead of 1 or 2.

BOTTOM LINE
Other teams cannot be allowed to be able to consistently cover our wide receivers one on one. We need better receivers or someone else developing schemes and calling plays. Or both. Tate is not the answer; perhaps Price is. But both wideouts should command a double team.
The Jets rushed 4 for most of the game. We kept a TE or RB to block as well.

That makes 4 receivers vs 7 DB's/LB's.

With the time Tom had to throw early on, we had no chance.

We got beat by a better defense than what played a few weeks back.

Simple.
__________________
Paul, London - Patriot and Proud
patriotscpfc is offline  
Old 01-17-2011, 06:34 AM   #4
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,603
My Mood: Breezy
Default Re: One On One on The Wide Receivers

The coaching staff/everyone knew that was how were they going to play after it worked against the colts

Surely you draw up some plays to counter that sort of coverage, slants, quick outs, bootlegs, the odd deep ball etc
JoeShmoe is offline  
Old 01-17-2011, 06:43 AM   #5
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
FoxboroFlyer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 559
Default Re: One On One on The Wide Receivers

The guys on the pregame were right if the refs called a tight game it would favor us, if not the advantage goes to the jets. Their DB's were man handling our WR's and TE's all game. There were plenty of plays that could and probably should have been flagged for at the very least holding.
FoxboroFlyer is online now  
Old 01-17-2011, 07:16 AM   #6
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,196
Default Re: One On One on The Wide Receivers

Not buying it, Super Bowls were won with less receiving talent than the 2010 team had. It's gotta go back to the D. The Patriots haven't had a dominant defense since 2004, it's time to draft some guys to rebuild the front 7.
stinkypete is offline  
Old 01-17-2011, 07:19 AM   #7
In the Starting Line-up
 
alvinnf's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,258
My Mood: Tired
Default Re: One On One on The Wide Receivers

There are plenty of ways to get guys open, through formation and motion. If NY wanted to stack the middle of the field and press on the outside. We could have used bunch sets and motion to create open space. Our big TE's are good enough in space to be put on the outside as well. Which at bare minimum would take a body away from the middle and you would be asking a smaller player like a cb to do the rerouting before passing him off. What it comes down to is a poor coaching job by the staff and the qb. In game 2 TB always checked into the right play. I dont feel as though he checked or took what they gave him often enough. The result is a loss.
alvinnf is offline  
Old 01-17-2011, 07:22 AM   #8
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
patsinthesnow's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,419
Default Re: One On One on The Wide Receivers

What's the trade value points #17 and #28 are worth? Just wondering, A.J Green is the best WR prospect since Calvin Johnson.
patsinthesnow is online now  
Old 01-17-2011, 08:54 AM   #9
Rookie
 

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 40
Default Re: One On One on The Wide Receivers

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich View Post
In the nfl, teams look for their receivers to be defended one on one. This is a situation where teams have a high percentage chance for a big play. This happens even with average wide receivers.

When Moss was here, Revis needed safety help against Moss most of the time. Cromartie need safety help also.

In this game, the corners didn't need help (or not very much). So, when they were in a nickel back situations, they had 3 defensive backs ton defend the middle instead of 1 or 2.

BOTTOM LINE
Other teams cannot be allowed to be able to consistently cover our wide receivers one on one. We need better receivers or someone else developing schemes and calling plays. Or both. Tate is not the answer; perhaps Price is. But both wideouts should command a double team.
I agree with you--except Revis didn't need safety help "most of the time" against Moss--pretty much shut him down as he has done before----exxcept for the play he pulled his muscle on.
sligoker is offline  
Old 01-17-2011, 09:00 AM   #10
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
The_Riddler's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,392
My Mood: Cynical
Default Re: One On One on The Wide Receivers

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich View Post
In the nfl, teams look for their receivers to be defended one on one. This is a situation where teams have a high percentage chance for a big play. This happens even with average wide receivers.

When Moss was here, Revis needed safety help against Moss most of the time. Cromartie need safety help also.

In this game, the corners didn't need help (or not very much). So, when they were in a nickel back situations, they had 3 defensive backs ton defend the middle instead of 1 or 2.

BOTTOM LINE
Other teams cannot be allowed to be able to consistently cover our wide receivers one on one. We need better receivers or someone else developing schemes and calling plays. Or both. Tate is not the answer; perhaps Price is. But both wideouts should command a double team.
Like I've been saying for a while now, Brandon Tate is not the answer, people kept saying all he needs is time, he's just a rookie. I mean if people aren't convinced now that he's nothing more than a #5 WR on any NFL team, then that his homerism at it's finest. He doesn't threaten anyone, on any defense, no one. This draft and off-season, we need a true, big, physical WR to keep safeties honest and a guy that TB can go to over the middle and deep. The blue print game plan was on full display last night against the dink and dunk, simply cheat everyone up and force the Pats to throw a ball deeper than 30 yards down the field.

In addition with Tate, why is he still returning kicks for this team?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Hey Rex have you met our new Tightends? Say Hi to Aaron and Gronk !
The_Riddler is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Six wide receivers mgteich PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 57 08-27-2007 06:59 AM
Wide Receivers ????? mgteich PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 17 08-27-2006 11:54 AM
Wide Receivers AndyJohnson PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 3 06-12-2005 02:24 PM
Wide Receivers mgteich PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 5 10-18-2004 12:30 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563