ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
In other words, would you prefer to have a format for the playoffs where all six teams from both conferences will play. Or, is the current format more ideal.
If this season's playoffs proceeded minus the bye week, you would've had the same match-ups except Indianapolis would host Kansas City.
Pro
Rest. Additional days to practice.
Con
Lost of momentum. Overconfidence.
Again, maybe, it's time to omit the bye week in the playoffs.
Last edited by furley; 01-16-2011 at 11:38 PM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: The playoff bye week, are you for or against it?
OVER CONFIDENCE MY ARSSE..... this loss was on the 2 people that carry the pats thru thick and thin and are no longer invinceable.. Bill Belichick and Tom Brady... Belichick coached scared and Brady played timid.... sorrry that is what loss this game... those 2 should have beat the inferior jets and the sucky coach and qb ,but for not they played up to the competition....
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: The playoff bye week, are you for or against it?
the sad thing is a bounce here a bounce there things are diffrent.
It's not like the team go blown out 45-3 it was 28-21 and came down to an onside kicks at the end even with an off day from some of the players.
__________________
Beware of the MBWC (Media Brain Washing Conspericy) the only known way to stay safe is to read at least one thread here a day. You have been warned.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Onion
See Wes [Welker], here, the man with the honor of being my chauffeur? This resourceful bastard actually beat me home, so it's not like it can't be done.
Re: The playoff bye week, are you for or against it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by A.C Vegas
the sad thing is a bounce here a bounce there things are diffrent.
It's not like the team go blown out 45-3 it was 28-21 and came down to an onside kicks at the end even with an off day from some of the players.
Stop it.... this team was BLOWN OUT TONIGHT.... no fire from the qb, panic from the coach, no hurrry from the o , no response from the d... alll a big let down.....
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: The playoff bye week, are you for or against it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by A.C Vegas
the sad thing is a bounce here a bounce there things are diffrent.
It's not like the team go blown out 45-3 it was 28-21 and came down to an onside kicks at the end even with an off day from some of the players.
The Pats got beat, the played poorly and were outcoached. Its come to the point where you just never know what Patriots team is going to show up. The Browns game, the Packers game, this game, the ravens game...I really can't put my finger on one thing that caused it as much as I want to, there should be a few shakeups this offseason and hopefully we add some vets and impact players through the draft and we will see what happens next season. The Pats didn't really look like a 14-2 team throughout the season, the showed flashes of brilliance at times but I was never truly sold that this team was elite.
Re: The playoff bye week, are you for or against it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Pa Patriot
Stop it.... this team was BLOWN OUT TONIGHT.... no fire from the qb, panic from the coach, no hurrry from the o , no response from the d... alll a big let down.....
Re: The playoff bye week, are you for or against it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by furley
In other words, would you prefer to have a format for the playoffs where all six teams from both conferences will play. Or, is the current format more ideal.
If this season's playoffs proceeded minus the bye week, you would've had the same match-ups except Indianapolis would host Kansas City.
Pro
Rest. Additional days to practice.
Con
Lost of momentum. Overconfidence.
Again, maybe, it's time to omit the bye week in the playoffs.
Read this. This is interesting. I don't know how long ago this link was first posted, but the data is still relevant information. Evidently, the odds weren't entirely in New England's favor being the first seed in the playoffs to begin with.
The flaw with the espn theory is that they are comparing the probability of the #1 seed to the combined probabilities of the #2, #3, #4, #5 and #6 seeds.
Just because the #1 seed does not win more than 50% of the time, that does not equate to the #1 seed being a bad thing. A #1 seed could have the highest probability of winning and yet at the same time also have a less than 50% chance of winning.
The 'evidence' is that 8.3% of the Super Bowl winners since 2002 have been #1 seeds. With twelve teams in the playoffs, each seed has about an 8.3% chance of randomly winning; that percentage is neither high nor low. Therefore being a #1 seed is neither bad nor good; it is average.
Those same stats show that 50% of the #1 seeds have made it to the Super Bowl in that same time frame. Using random 'flip of a coin' analysis, any specific seed should have made it that far just 16.6% of the time. In other words, being a #1 seed is a very favorable position to be in.
So while 8.3% may equal 8.3%, 50% is much greater than 16.6%; the theory that being a #1 seed is meaningless, or is a bad thing just does not hold true - even when two #1 seeds don't advance.
As for the OP's question about all teams playing (i.e., no byes), there are really only two ways to accomplish that:
- expand the playoffs to 16 teams - which means four more mediocre teams
- reduce the playoffs to 8 teams - which means eliminating teams like the Packers, Ravens and Jets
Re: The playoff bye week, are you for or against it?
Home field advantage might be one of the biggest overinflated things that fans wish for every season.....HFA does not guarantee a thing if you don't have a great game plan for that particular game.
It's becoming a very common trend that these hot teams playing in the wild card games are moving deep into the playoffs while the so called 'rested' teams are progressively going down.
2 #6 seeds in the championship games proves that will likely continue more often than not years from now
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.