Forbes: ‘Economic Realities’ for Lockout Unwarranted - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-14-2011, 11:52 AM   #1
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,078
Default Forbes: ‘Economic Realities’ for Lockout Unwarranted

Quote:
Numbers Show NFL’s ‘Economic Realities’ for Lockout Unwarranted

Jan. 10 2011

posted by MAURY BROWN

The claim by the NFL is that if the players don’t reduce salaries and increase the amount they are providing in “expense credits” for expenditures such as stadium development, the league could see rocky times.

“Yes, NFL players deserve to be paid well,” said Commissioner Goodell in a January letter to fans. “Unfortunately, economic realities are forcing everyone to make tough choices and the NFL is no different.”

But, do the economic realities really point to the NFL needing to make “tough choices”? Here’s how it all breaks down.

...
Required reading for NFL fans who want to know the facts behind the two sides' rhetoric.
lamafist is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-14-2011, 12:33 PM   #2
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 629
Default Re: Forbes: ‘Economic Realities’ for Lockout Unwarranted

The average operating income of an NFL team is 33 million. ESPN increasing their payment to the NFL by 900 million means that each team almost doubles their operating income (it's about an additional 28 million per team). The fact that ESPN is willing to pay almost double for continued access to broadcast NFL games means that the game is wayyyy more popular than before and the owners are full of ****.

Last edited by Phokus; 01-14-2011 at 12:43 PM..
Phokus is offline  
Old 01-14-2011, 12:35 PM   #3
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
BradyManny's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,298
Default Re: Forbes: ‘Economic Realities’ for Lockout Unwarranted

I wonder at what point the Commish and owners start listening to fans...well, I guess I know at what point, the point at which it starts costing them $$. Of course, w the situation as explained above, the owners have all the leverage.

But based on the facts as they are laid out here, it won't be long before the general NFL fan has firmly sided him or herself with the NFLPA, and against the owners.

It does seem like the owners are being unreasonable.
BradyManny is offline  
Old 01-14-2011, 01:03 PM   #4
In the Starting Line-up
 
JMarr's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,159
Default Re: Forbes: ‘Economic Realities’ for Lockout Unwarranted

The NFLPA is already screwed because of the TV situation--billions of dollars coming in from the networks even if no games are played. We already know how this is going to end--either by the players caving, or [more likely] by a lockout. Seven more weeks til it happens, and given the level of greed that the owners are showing, it won't be at all surprising if they don't get an agreement done at all in 2011.

This makes the stakes all the higher in terms of who gets to hoist the Lombardi next month. There might not be a SB next season, and the owners seemingly have no hesitation in sacrificing the overall quality of their product if it means bring in more $$.
JMarr is offline  
Old 01-14-2011, 01:07 PM   #5
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 65
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Forbes: ‘Economic Realities’ for Lockout Unwarranted

In other news, water is wet.
Chupacabra is offline  
Old 01-14-2011, 02:19 PM   #6
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,090
My Mood: Twisted
Default Re: Forbes: ‘Economic Realities’ for Lockout Unwarranted

F them both i want football but i could care less about (mostly) millionaries vs billionaires
__________________
Beware of the MBWC (Media Brain Washing Conspericy) the only known way to stay safe is to read at least one thread here a day. You have been warned.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Onion
See Wes [Welker], here, the man with the honor of being my chauffeur? This resourceful bastard actually beat me home, so it's not like it can't be done.
A.C Vegas is offline  
Old 01-14-2011, 02:41 PM   #7
In the Starting Line-up
 
pheenix11's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tampa, FL (originally Boston)
Posts: 2,242
Default Re: Forbes: ‘Economic Realities’ for Lockout Unwarranted

Sounds like the owners are following the lead of the banksters. This is really ridiculous. If they want people to believe they are hurting then open the books! Otherwise shut the eff up because I don't buy it for a second. It's really amazing in a league that is doing so well that it is still not enough. These greedy bastards still want more. It's never enough.
__________________
16-0? Yup I called it:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by jmt57; 01-26-2011 at 07:17 PM..
pheenix11 is offline  
Old 01-14-2011, 02:52 PM   #8
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
BradyManny's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,298
Default Re: Forbes: ‘Economic Realities’ for Lockout Unwarranted

Quote:
Originally Posted by A.C Vegas View Post
F them both i want football but i could care less about (mostly) millionaries vs billionaires
I wouldn't say most football players are millionaires - it's a little short-sighted when the average NFL career is less than 4 years. The stars are the exception, not the rule.

The average football player is not going to make enough in his career to live off of comfortably for the duration of his life, and probably sacrificed his body in the process.

Now, for some, that has to do with the way these guys spend money, sure. The NFL and the NFLPA has to do a better job of mentoring these young kids in what to do with their money.

Last edited by BradyManny; 01-14-2011 at 02:53 PM..
BradyManny is offline  
Old 01-14-2011, 03:00 PM   #9
In the Starting Line-up
 
pheenix11's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tampa, FL (originally Boston)
Posts: 2,242
Default Re: Forbes: ‘Economic Realities’ for Lockout Unwarranted

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyManny View Post
I wouldn't say most football players are millionaires - it's a little short-sighted when the average NFL career is less than 4 years. The stars are the exception, not the rule.

The average football player is not going to make enough in his career to live off of comfortably for the duration of his life, and probably sacrificed his body in the process.

Now, for some, that has to do with the way these guys spend money, sure. The NFL and the NFLPA has to do a better job of mentoring these young kids in what to do with their money.

I think NFL players are the few athletes who earn their money. It is a rough sport that will affect many of them for the rest of their lives and they can't play it for that long.

In comparison MLB salaries are a joke, they don't deserve what they get.
__________________
16-0? Yup I called it:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
pheenix11 is offline  
Old 01-14-2011, 03:11 PM   #10
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,078
Default Re: Forbes: ‘Economic Realities’ for Lockout Unwarranted

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMarr View Post
The NFLPA is already screwed because of the TV situation--billions of dollars coming in from the networks even if no games are played.
Not necessarily.

While it's true that under the contract with the TV networks, they continue to pay on schedule in the event of a lockout, the NFL doesn't get to keep the money. They are required to enter into arbitration with the networks over the appropriate levels of compensation. This will, of course, take approximately.. for-freaking-ever. So while the owners won't be hit as immediately as the players, they're still losing money long-term.

Secondly, no matter what the owners or their reps are saying, they have to have an idea just how damaging a lockout would be.

The NFL is enjoying unprecedented growth at present and an interruption right now would be terribly disruptive.

Thanks to on-demand, netflix and DVR, the networks are madly in love with live event television right now... especially if it attracts young men. It's no accident that shows with live performances and results, like American Idol and Dancing With the Stars do so well, as well as buzzy serialized shows like Lost, where if you don't watch on time, you'll probably end up having what happens spoiled for you.

This is a huge advantage for the NFL at the moment... but it's not going to last forever. Eventually, as the other options become more familiar and more convenient, people will eventually stop missing the feeling of knowing that they're watching something live at the same time as everyone else. With the rate that the new delivery streams like netflix and on-demand are growing, 2011 is not a year the NFL wants to sit out -- this might be the last best year for the NFL to grow its brand.

Finally, while the NFL might still get it's weekly checks from the networks, they might come at the expense of poisoning the well. The TV networks do not have the liquidity and are far more dependent on their NFL programming than they were in the early 80's. A strike this time could badly damage the league's relationships with the networks, as well as the networks themselves. Right now, the NFL is one of a scant few properties that makes the current network TV model still make the slightest bit of financial sense. If the NFL pulls the rug out from underneath the networks just now, network television as we know will not survive 2011.

It's starting already with Comcast buying out NBC -- eventually, the networks are going to all be absorbed by companies who are part of the new entertainment distribution paradigm. The old networks will continue to exist as entertainment brands, but they will no longer be allowed to throw good money after bad to prolong their existence... they will have only as much money put into them as their cable/internet providing parent companies can expect to get out.

What does this mean for the NFL? It means no more negotiating with desperate fools clinging to the old ways of doing things who might really want the NFL, but don't need it the way the current networks do. It also means negotiating with companies that won't tolerate DirecTV getting exclusive out-of-market and web broadcasting rights. It means lots of big, scary and expensive changes in the way things work.

Basically, the NFL is in a really, really good, but equally tenuous, spot -- the owners have to know that this is not the time to be rocking the boat.
lamafist is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unwarranted Executive Power All_Around_Brown Political Discussion 0 12-27-2005 03:25 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC