ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
On the other hand, I think the premise of the article may be patently ridiculous. First off, whatever team has the most wins is likely to be most efficient based soley on that. Secondly, is the writer simply looking at money paid this year in a vaccuum? If all teams are spending to the cap, then they are all technically spending the same amount of money, but are doing so more or less in different years.
Maybe someone with more expertise can set me straight if I am wrong.
__________________ A Truly Vindictive Fanboy-type Poster
"My name is William Stephen Belichick, Coach of the New England Patriots, Three Time Super Bowl Champion, Defensive Guru, Pride of Karlovac, The Greatest Coach in the History of the NFL Since Vince Lombardi. Target of the spygate lynching, Defender of our Dynasty's legacy. And I will have my vengeance, in this game and the rest."
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
On the other hand, I think the premise of the article may be patently ridiculous. First off, whatever team has the most wins is likely to be most efficient based soley on that. Secondly, is the writer simply looking at money paid this year in a vaccuum? If all teams are spending to the cap, then they are all technically spending the same amount of money, but are doing so more or less in different years.
Maybe someone with more expertise can set me straight if I am wrong.
It's a no brainer. they managed to put together a 14 win season with most of the players still on rookie contracts.
If that worked all the time nobody would ever get a good contract, but it doesn't.
It's an anomaly. I would guess they are close to twice as efficient as everyone else. Wait a few years til some of these contracts run out, they'll be scrambling.
I can't figure out the cap vs actual money, but just use common sense.Signed Brady, Wilfork and Bodden. That's it, as far as I'm concerned, two great vets and hopefully another good one.
Other than that they avoided big Sey contract, picked up a serviceable Branch right in stride and let Seattle take that long term hit. Pretty much have everyone else on rookie contracts or pretty good market deals including Mankins for now.
Part cyclical (they'll have to reup some of these youngsters), part system (patience, patience, patience) part incredible draft management and coaching leadership never before seen coaching up the kids.
3rd lowest salary in the league? Further proof that COTY should not even be a discussion
I assume they're talking about actual cash paid out, which is a very different issue from the salary cap, and shows a lot of year-to-year variance.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
No cap this year. Now, you have to carry my pads back to the locker Rook.
ha, but it is likely it will be implemented again when a cba comes to fruition, hence why we didnt do a jets and go all out win now and reap sadness when we have to trade away our roster.
Although there was no cap this year, the league sure operated as if there was a cap. And a lower cap than the year before.
The inability of players like Logan Mankins to cash in - the prime source of large contracts - constrained payrolls. Further, even in the absence of a cap, no team broke the bank like the Yankees or Red Sox.
If they look at just cash paid out, as noted, that's not a valid view. In a salary cap -- or salary caplike -- system, the salary structure should be pretty similar and the team with the most wins is 'the most efficient.'
Nothing to see here.
Where this gets interesting is baseball. There you can have a 100-win team look terribly inefficient, and a 70-win team look very efficient. When you have team salaries varying between $40mm and $200mm, the analysis shows interesting outliers.
__________________
"Your father was a truck driver, Ray?"
- Trombley