The Coughlin conundrum - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-28-2007, 12:24 PM   #11
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,464
Default Re: The Coughlin conundrum

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustWinBrady View Post
Coughlin says they will try to win the game. He didn't say he will play his starters the entire game to try to win the game. Whom ever is on the field for the giants they will try to win the game, that is what coaches get paid to do, win games. It is the exact same thing BB says. They try to win every game no matter what players are on the field.
That is basically a meaningless statement. I'm sure it's designed to be meaningless, but let's just face it - it's meaningless.

Yet, Burris and Jacobs are said to be practicing, and I don't think you practice guys who are not going to play. Perhaps the little lie in this whole thing is that Burris and Jacobs will start, but maybe get yanked after a quarter or two.

So just will Coughlin do? Who will he play? We know Eli is a basket case who needs work, so there is a given. But if you're going to try to win the game with scrubs against NE, that is about as lame and empty a promise as any I've ever heard.
FrontSeven is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 12-28-2007, 12:32 PM   #12
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,464
Default Re: The Coughlin conundrum

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEGoldenAge View Post
This crap is why the best thing to say to the press is "I will do what's best for the team.".
Yes, dearie, but that is just another version of the original, meaningless statement. If you're going to get that creative you might as well just tell the media "no comment" or "I refuse to tell you who we're going to play."

Personally, I'd sit Burris and Jacobs, absorb the defeat, and move on. But that is one ugly scenario if Bill lets his starters stay on the field. That is perhaps the low point of the Giants' franchise. That is national TV. That is the largest regular season game viewing audience in the history of the sport. That is an embarrassment that could deliver a hangover of huge proportions.

And like that other guy said, teams that lose to the Pats don't exactly fare well the next week.

They're screwed. I believe the Giants are totally screwed.
FrontSeven is offline  
Old 12-28-2007, 12:32 PM   #13
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 508
Default Re: The Coughlin conundrum

There is no conundrum.

If they were playing a league average team; what should they do in terms of playing/resting players? Whatever his answer to that is; that should be how he plays it against new england. Whether new england does or does not go 16-0 is not his concern. His concern is doing whatever makes his team best prepared for the playoffs.

A win over NE would be a huge jumpstart to their playoffs. However, trying hard 100% and losing would basically guarantee a first round exit.

If I was him, I'd play my starters for the 1st quarter. If the game is close/they-have-the-lead I'd keep them in the 2nd quarter. Then 2nd half play the scrubs
Truck is offline  
Old 12-28-2007, 01:25 PM   #14
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default Re: The Coughlin conundrum

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrontSeven View Post
They're screwed. I believe the Giants are totally screwed.
I believe this about sums it up. But that was the case either way for Coughlin. Sucks to be a lame duck HC on a team where the inmates run the asylum under the watchful eye of the most judgemental in the world.

Once the mediots weighed in on the significance of beating us, and the players weighed in on the potential significance of momentum, on the heels of Cowher hinting he will not take another NFL HC job next season, Coughlin lost all rational control of the situation. He wants that one more year with the players and media who barely tolerate him...so he will take a shot at giving them what they want knowing that either way he's screwed if they lose in Tampa.
MoLewisrocks is offline  
Old 12-28-2007, 03:49 PM   #15
I can delete my own crap!
 
Lloyd_Christmas's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,405
Blog Entries: 1
My Mood: Cynical
Default Re: The Coughlin conundrum

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEGoldenAge View Post
This crap is why the best thing to say to the press is "I will do what's best for the team.".

I agree. Or just say "We are not going to tip our hand as to what we are planning to do."

It was dumb to say they were going to play all out to win the game. They are setting themselves up to make this their SB versus the Patriots... which is needless since it is a meaningless game for them and they have very little hope of winning it anyway.

When they lose, their moral will be down and they may possibly be worse off injury-wise. Better to play the backups most of the game and save face. Focus on the next week and put everything you have into THAT game... a game that means a lot more for your team and may actually be winnable.
__________________
A Truly Vindictive Fanboy-type Poster

"My name is William Stephen Belichick, Coach of the New England Patriots, Three Time Super Bowl Champion, Defensive Guru, Pride of Karlovac, The Greatest Coach in the History of the NFL Since Vince Lombardi. Target of the spygate lynching, Defender of our Dynasty's legacy. And I will have my vengeance, in this game and the rest."
Lloyd_Christmas is offline  
Old 12-28-2007, 03:56 PM   #16
I can delete my own crap!
 
Lloyd_Christmas's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,405
Blog Entries: 1
My Mood: Cynical
Default Re: The Coughlin conundrum

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrontSeven View Post
Personally, I'd sit Burris and Jacobs, absorb the defeat, and move on. But that is one ugly scenario if Bill lets his starters stay on the field. That is perhaps the low point of the Giants' franchise. That is national TV. That is the largest regular season game viewing audience in the history of the sport. That is an embarrassment that could deliver a hangover of huge proportions.

And like that other guy said, teams that lose to the Pats don't exactly fare well the next week.

They're screwed. I believe the Giants are totally screwed.
I agree that the Giants are screwed, but if they got blowed out (sic) in the matchup playing all their scrubs, I don't see that as an embarrassing defeat.

You can always justify by saying that the game was meaningless to the Giants and so there was no sense putting starters at risk. Nobody is going to fault their scrubs for a huge loss and there isn't much to gain strategy-wise if the Giants starters don't play and the play calling is vanilla, preseason-style, play calling.
__________________
A Truly Vindictive Fanboy-type Poster

"My name is William Stephen Belichick, Coach of the New England Patriots, Three Time Super Bowl Champion, Defensive Guru, Pride of Karlovac, The Greatest Coach in the History of the NFL Since Vince Lombardi. Target of the spygate lynching, Defender of our Dynasty's legacy. And I will have my vengeance, in this game and the rest."
Lloyd_Christmas is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC