12-28-2007, 03:56 PM
|
#16
|
|
I can delete my own crap!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,405
My Mood:
|
Re: The Coughlin conundrum
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrontSeven
Personally, I'd sit Burris and Jacobs, absorb the defeat, and move on. But that is one ugly scenario if Bill lets his starters stay on the field. That is perhaps the low point of the Giants' franchise. That is national TV. That is the largest regular season game viewing audience in the history of the sport. That is an embarrassment that could deliver a hangover of huge proportions.
And like that other guy said, teams that lose to the Pats don't exactly fare well the next week.
They're screwed. I believe the Giants are totally screwed.
|
I agree that the Giants are screwed, but if they got blowed out (sic) in the matchup playing all their scrubs, I don't see that as an embarrassing defeat.
You can always justify by saying that the game was meaningless to the Giants and so there was no sense putting starters at risk. Nobody is going to fault their scrubs for a huge loss and there isn't much to gain strategy-wise if the Giants starters don't play and the play calling is vanilla, preseason-style, play calling.
__________________
A Truly Vindictive Fanboy-type Poster
"My name is William Stephen Belichick, Coach of the New England Patriots, Three Time Super Bowl Champion, Defensive Guru, Pride of Karlovac, The Greatest Coach in the History of the NFL Since Vince Lombardi. Target of the spygate lynching, Defender of our Dynasty's legacy. And I will have my vengeance, in this game and the rest."
|
|
|