ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
An overall good article, brings up some good points...
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
And as I said in another thread, inspired by the Patriots PR that suddenly started mentioning win streaks -- it's always been OK to talk about winning the NEXT game. Only this time, the next game is the potential record-setter.
An overall good article, brings up some good points...
But, like most articles, it gets basic facts wrong. It wasn't 28-7 at intermission, it was 28-0. And the phrase "a game in which the Pats seemed bored at times by their own brilliance in the second half" is easily misinterpreted to mean that they were brilliant in the second half which was clearly not the case.
Pasquarelli on Pats..
Linear Mode
