Moss getting more MVP discussion - could he beat out Brady? - Page 5 - New England Patriots Forums

FrontSeven · 11-28-2007, 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xzibit23

minus the SBs Moss has been just as good at his position as Brady has been at his.

That's not the point. The point is about who is more valuable to the team (the one whose loss would impact the team more.)

Xzibit23 · 11-29-2007, 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FrontSeven

That's not the point. The point is about who is more valuable to the team (the one whose loss would impact the team more.)

I actually wasn't making a point, I was responding to another poster claiming Brady's greatness as the reason for him being the MVP over Moss. Did you not read the rest of my posts, I mentioned several times that the real reason why Brady's the MVP is because he plays a more valuable position that has a greater impact, in those words.

Xzibit23 · 11-29-2007, 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by holyredeemer

We can argue about this as much as you'd like, but in the end, i'm right and your wrong. You just dont get it. The point is this. If Moss was still in Oakland, he'd be a piece of ****, a joke, a big dissapointment. If Moss didnt come here, brady would still be having a great yr. How can you argue with that? Brady would still be all pro and Moss would be in the gutter. Would Brady be having as good of a yr. that hes had? No, he wouldnt be, but he would still be having the best yr. of his career.
So, that's why Brady is the MVP, and Moss should be nowhere in the discussion of the two.

It's MOST VALUABLE PLAYER. If we didnt have Moss, we'd still be winning games, if we didnt ha....screw it. Im not going to tempt the football gods by even going there.

If you didn't have Brady you'd still be winning games...you can say it, cause its true. Would you be breaking records?? Of course not.